Cited by 16Digital literacy in educationEnglish Language Learning and TeachingEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

Modeling the Contribution of EFL Students’ Digital Literacy to Their Foreign Language Enjoyment and Self-Efficacy in Online Education

Feng, Lijuan·2024·The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40299-023-00787-1

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feng, L.
Affiliations
Zhengzhou Business University (CN)
Corresponding author
Feng, Lijuan
Venue
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
Published
2023-11-28
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
977-985
ISSN
  • 0119-5646 (ISSN-L)
  • 2243-7908
OpenAlex
W4389086706
Cited by
16
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5
FWCI
3.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
digital literacy, foreign language enjoyment, online learning self-efficacy, EFL learners, online learning, second language acquisition, perceived emotion, Chinese university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review