Cited by 32Teaching and Learning ProgrammingDesign Education and PracticeEngineering Education and Pedagogy

Development of novel-engineering-based maker education instructional model

Kim, Ji-Yun, Seo, Jae Seon, Kim, Kwihoon·2022·Education and Information Technologies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10639-021-10841-4

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, J.-Y., Seo, J. S., & Kim, K.
Affiliations
  • Korea National University of Education (KR)
  • Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Kwihoon
Venue
Education and Information Technologies
Published
2022-02-09
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
7327-7371
ISSN
  • 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7608
OpenAlex
W4210920632
Cited by
29
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (No. 2021R1G1A109330611)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Engineering Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
maker education, teaching model, rural elementary education, maker mindset, design thinking, low-cost teaching materials, urban-rural education gap, maker projects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review