Cited by 35Online Learning and AnalyticsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningArtificial Intelligence in Education

Exploring students’ expectations of learning analytics: A person-centered approach

Open access
Viberg, Olga, Engström, Linda, Saqr, Mohammed, Hrastinski, Stefan·2022·Education and Information Technologies

Abstract

In order to successfully implement learning analytics (LA), we need a better understanding of student expectations of such services. Yet, there is still a limited body of research about students’ expectations across countries. Student expectations of LA have been predominantly examined from a view that perceives students as a group of individuals representing homogenous views. This study examines students’ ideal (i.e., representing their wanted outcomes) and predicted expectations (i.e., unveiling what they realistically expect the LA service is most likely to be) of LA by employing a person-centered approach that allows exploring the heterogeneity that may be found in student expectations. We collected data from 132 students in the setting of Swedish higher education by means of an online survey. Descriptive statistics and Latent Class Analysis (LCA) were used for the analysis. Our findings show that students’ ideal expectations of LA were considerably higher compared to their predicted expectations. The results of the LCA exhibit that the Swedish students’ expectations of LA were heterogeneous, both regarding their privacy concerns and their expectations of LA services. The findings of this study can be seen as a baseline of students’ expectations or a cross-sectional average, and be used to inform student-centered implementation of LA in higher education.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10639-022-10980-2

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Students are not willing to disclose all data for AI applications despite anticipated benefits.

    “Initial study results indicate (Howell et al., 2018;Viberg et al., 2022;West, Heath, et al., 2016;West, Huijser, et al., 2016a, 2016b) that students are not willing to disclose all data for AI applications despite anticipated benefits.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Engström, L., Viberg, O., Hrastinski, S., & Bälter, O. (2022). Swedish students' expectations of learn- ing analytics in higher education. In Proceedings of the 13 th IEEE Global Engineering Conference (EDUCON) 2022. (in press) European Commission (2019). Sweden in the Digital Economy and Society Index. https:// digit al-strat egy. ec. europa. eu/ en/ polic ies/ desi-sweden 2022-01-15.
  2. Nouri, J., Ebner, M., Ifenthaler, D., Saqr, M., Malmberg, J., Khalil, M., Brunn, J., Viberg, O., Conzalez, M., Papapitzou, Z., & Berthelsen, U. (2019). Efforts in Europe for data-driven improvement of edu- cation -A review of learning analytics research in Si countries. International Journal of Learning Analytics and Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1, 8-27.
  3. Shackle, G. (1952). Expectations in economics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  4. Taylor & Francis.
  5. Vroom, V. (1964). Work and motivation. Wiley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Viberg, O., Engström, L., Saqr, M., & Hrastinski, S.
Affiliations
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
Corresponding author
Viberg, Olga
Venue
Education and Information Technologies
Published
2022-03-09
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
8561-8581
ISSN
  • 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7608
OpenAlex
W4221075601
Cited by
35
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 2
FWCI
5.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Royal Institute of Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
Keywords
learning analytics, student expectations, person-centered approach, privacy concerns, university students, Swedish higher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review