Cited by 92Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionOnline Learning and AnalyticsPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

Students' privacy concerns in learning analytics: Model development

Open access
Mutimukwe, Chantal, Viberg, Olga, Oberg, Lena‐Maria, Cerratto‐Pargman, Teresa·2022·British Journal of Educational Technology

Abstract

Understanding students' privacy concerns is an essential first step toward effective privacy‐enhancing practices in learning analytics (LA). In this study, we develop and validate a model to explore the students' privacy concerns (SPICE) regarding LA practice in higher education. The SPICE model considers privacy concerns as a central construct between two antecedents—perceived privacy risk and perceived privacy control, and two outcomes—trusting beliefs and non‐self‐disclosure behaviours. To validate the model, data through an online survey were collected, and 132 students from three Swedish universities participated in the study. Partial least square results show that the model accounts for high variance in privacy concerns, trusting beliefs, and non‐self‐disclosure behaviours. They also illustrate that students' perceived privacy risk is a firm predictor of their privacy concerns. The students' privacy concerns and perceived privacy risk were found to affect their non‐self‐disclosure behaviours. Finally, the results show that the students' perceptions of privacy control and privacy risks determine their trusting beliefs. The study results contribute to understand the relationships between students' privacy concerns, trust and non‐self‐disclosure behaviours in the LA context. A set of relevant implications for LA systems' design and privacy‐enhancing practices' development in higher education is offered. Practitioner notes: What is already known about this topic Addressing students' privacy is critical for large‐scale learning analytics (LA) implementation. Understanding students' privacy concerns is an essential first step to developing effective privacy‐enhancing practices in LA. Several conceptual, not empirically validated frameworks focus on ethics and privacy in LA. What this paper adds The paper offers a validated model to explore the nature of students' privacy concerns in LA in higher education. It provides an enhanced theoretical understanding of the relationship between privacy concerns, trust and self‐disclosure behaviour in the LA context of higher education. It offers a set of relevant implications for LA researchers and practitioners. Implications for practice and/or policy Students' perceptions of privacy risks and privacy control are antecedents of students' privacy concerns, trust in the higher education institution and the willingness to share personal information. Enhancing students' perceptions of privacy control and reducing perceptions of privacy risks are essential for LA adoption and success. Contextual factors that may influence students' privacy concerns should be considered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjet.13234

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mutimukwe, C., Viberg, O., Oberg, L., & Cerratto‐Pargman, T.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
  • Department of Computer and Systems Science Mid Sweden University Östersund Sweden
  • Department of Computer and Systems Science Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden
Corresponding author
Viberg, Olga
Venue
British Journal of Educational Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-05-19
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
932-951
ISSN
  • 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8535
OpenAlex
W4280591445
Cited by
90
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 4
FWCI
22.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
British Journal of Educational Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Keywords
learning analytics, privacy risks, institutional trust, higher education, SPICE model, personal data sharing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review