Cited by 131Online Learning and AnalyticsEducational and Technological ResearchEducational Technology in Learning

Learning analytics in higher education: a preponderance of analytics but very little learning?

Open access
Guzmán-Valenzuela, Carolina, Gómez-González, Carolina, Rojas-Murphy Tagle, Andrés, Lorca-Vyhmeister, Alejandro·2021·International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education

Abstract

In a context where learning mediated by technology has gained prominence in higher education, learning analytics has become a powerful tool to collect and analyse data with the aim of improving students’ learning. However, learning analytics is part of a young community and its developments deserve further exploration. Some critical stances claim that learning analytics tends to underplay the complexity of teaching-learning processes. By means of both a bibliometric and a content analysis, this paper examines the publication patterns on learning analytics in higher education and their main challenges. 385 papers that were published in WoScc and SciELO indexes between 2013 and 2019 were identified and analysed. Learning analytics is a vibrant and fast-developing community. However, it continues to face multiple and complex challenges, especially regarding students’ learning and their implications. The paper concludes by distinguishing between a practice-based and management-oriented community of learning analytics and an academic-oriented community. Within both communities, though, it seems that the focus is more on analytics than on learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s41239-021-00258-x

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Guzmán-Valenzuela et al. (2021) critiqued the prevailing focus on analytics over substantive learning improvements, advocating for a balanced approach valuing pedagogical effectiveness alongside technological advancements.

    “They critiqued the prevailing focus on analytics over substantive learning improvements, advocating for a balanced approach that equally values pedagogical effectiveness alongside technological advancements (Drugova et al., 2024).”

    From Unpacking student engagement in higher education learning analytics: a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Guzmán-Valenzuela et al. (2021)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ifenthaler, D., & Gibson, D. (Eds.). (2020). Adoption of data analytics in higher education learning and teaching. Cham: Springer.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guzmán-Valenzuela, C., Gómez-González, C., Rojas-Murphy Tagle, A., & Lorca-Vyhmeister, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Tarapacá (CL)
  • University of Valparaíso (CL)
Corresponding author
Guzmán-Valenzuela, Carolina
Venue
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
Published
2021-05-04
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
23-23
ISSN
2365-9440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3163777542
Cited by
131
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 5
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
FONDECYT (1200633, 1161413)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational and Technological Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
Keywords
learning analytics, higher education, publication trends, teaching-learning process, student learning, technology-mediated learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review