Cited by 36Education and Technology IntegrationMathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

Effect of teachers’ TPACK on their behavioral intention to use technology: chain mediating effect of technology self-efficacy and attitude toward use

Bai, Xuemei, Guo, Rifa, Gu, Xiaoqing·2024·Education and Information Technologies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10639-023-12343-x

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bai, X., Guo, R., & Gu, X.
Affiliations
  • Ningxia University (CN)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • East China Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Gu, Xiaoqing
Venue
Education and Information Technologies
Published
2023-11-24
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
1013-1032
ISSN
  • 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7608
OpenAlex
W4388976678
Cited by
36
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6
FWCI
26.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
TPACK, technological pedagogical content knowledge, technology self-efficacy, serial mediation, in-service teachers, basic education teachers, educational technology adoption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review