Cited by 38Artificial Intelligence in EducationTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourAI in Service Interactions

AI for Academic Success: Investigating the Role of Usability, Enjoyment, and Responsiveness in ChatGPT Adoption

Kim, Minseong, Kim, Jihye, Knotts, Tami L., Albers, Nancy D.·2025·Education and Information Technologies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10639-025-13398-8

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The spike in research in 2023 likely correlates with the widespread release and adoption of generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT.

    “This spike likely correlates with the widespread release and adoption of generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT, which induced academic interest and application development [40,41].”
  • Recent literature indicates a surge in generative AI adoption in education due to its versatility in producing personalized content and feedback.

    “This aligns with recent literature indicating a surge in generative AI adoption in education due to its versatility in producing personalized content and feedback [40,41].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, M., Kim, J., Knotts, T. L., & Albers, N. D.
Affiliations
  • Louisiana State University (US)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Minseong
Venue
Education and Information Technologies
Published
2025-01-28
Volume
30
Issue
10
Pages
14393-14414
ISSN
  • 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7608
OpenAlex
W4406918334
Cited by
38
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 16
FWCI
39.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
ChatGPT, generative AI adoption, technology acceptance, perceived usability, perceived enjoyment, perceived responsiveness, student motivation, emotional attachment, user satisfaction, continuance intention, undergraduate students, human-AI interaction, artificial intelligence in education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review