Extended TAM based acceptance of AI-Powered ChatGPT for supporting metacognitive self-regulated learning in education: A mixed-methods study
Open accessAbstract
This mixed-method study explores the acceptance of ChatGPT as a tool for Metacognitive Self-Regulated Learning (MSRL) among academics. Despite the growing attention towards ChatGPT as a metacognitive learning tool, there is a need for a comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing its acceptance in academic settings. Engaging 300 preservice teachers through a ChatGPT-based scenario learning activity and utilizing convenience sampling, this study administered a questionnaire based on the proposed Technology Acceptance Model at UTM University's School of Education. Structural equation modelling was applied to analyze participants' perspectives on ChatGPT, considering factors like MSRL's impact on usage intention. Post-reflection sessions, semi-structured interviews, and record analysis were conducted to gather results. Findings indicate a high acceptance of ChatGPT, significantly influenced by personal competency, social influence, perceived AI usefulness, enjoyment, trust, AI intelligence, positive attitude, and metacognitive self-regulated learning. Interviews and record analysis suggest that academics view ChatGPT positively as an educational tool, seeing it as a solution to challenges in teaching and learning processes. The study highlights ChatGPT's potential to enhance MSRL and holds implications for teacher education and AI integration in educational settings.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The positive effects of SI are consistent with prior research indicating that social expectations, peer endorsement, and collective support can shape users' acceptance of new technologies.
“Similarly, the positive effects of SI are consistent with prior research indicating that social expectations, peer endorsement, and collective support can shape users’ acceptance of new technologies [61,103,104,105,106].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
1 retracted
Wang, C., Ahmad, S. F., Ahmad, A. Y. A. B., Awwad, E. M., Irshad, M., Ali, Y. A., Al‐Razgan, M., Khan, Y., & Han, H. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18349 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
RetractedUsing thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190 · cited 4× · see citing works
“These collective findings affirm that these constructs effectively measure distinct latent variables, ensuring the absence of multicollinearity or overlapping influences [125 – 127]. technology for educational purposes.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialPerceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Empirical support for this concept is evident in Dent and Koenka ’ s [19] meta-analysis of 61 studies, where measures of metacognitive processes exhibited stronger correlations with achievement compared to measures of cognitive strategy utilization.”
BackgroundA new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 · Cited by 38,459 · see citing works
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737 · see citing works
When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019) · European Business Review · doi:10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203 · Cited by 27,541 · cited 5× · see citing works
“These values surpass the recommended threshold of 0.7, affirming strong internal consistency [102,123].”
BackgroundInfluentialUser Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The model explains that PU and PEOU shape individuals ’ attitudes and both PU and attitudes toward technology usage predict BI [46,60].”
BackgroundMethodPartial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research
F. Hair Jr, J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & G. Kuppelwieser, V. (2014) · European Business Review · doi:10.1108/ebr-10-2013-0128 · Cited by 11,728 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This was done per the well-established two-step approach suggested by other research [116,115,117,118].”
BackgroundMethodComparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling
Etikan, I. (2016) · American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics · doi:10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 · Cited by 11,412 · cited 4× · see citing works
“[110,111].”
MethodResultInfluentialAn assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6 · Cited by 8,088 · see citing works
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1 · Cited by 6,887 · see citing works
Venkatesh, V. (2000) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 · Cited by 6,664 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Moreover, Venkatesh [92] discovered that the impact of enjoyment on the perception of ease of use becomes more pronounced as users accumulate direct experience with the system over time.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential(2000) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-109890-2.x5027-6 · Cited by 4,439 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…of awareness that learners possess regarding their strengths and weaknesses, their ability to employ effective learning strategies, self-motivation for active engagement in learning, and their capacity to formulate and implement strategies and tactics to enhance the learning process [13 – 15].”
BackgroundKallio, H., Pietilä, A., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.13031 · Cited by 4,295 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This method facilitated direct communication with ChatGPT participants, providing unique understandings [106,107] and allowing in-depth exploration of complex phenomena [108].”
MethodAn updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research
Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2017) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-04-2016-0130 · Cited by 4,043 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These values surpass the recommended threshold of 0.7, affirming strong internal consistency [102,123].”
BackgroundInfluentialA social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329 · Cited by 3,807 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Numerous studies have consistently demonstrated the substantial influence of SRL, with a specific emphasis on metacognition, on students ’ academic performance, irrespective of their innate abilities or prior achievements [10 – 12].”
BackgroundZimmerman, B. J. (2008) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831207312909 · Cited by 3,735 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Successful online learners set specific goals, focus on learning rather than performance, and possess task-specific self-efficacy and self-instruction tendencies, which are crucial in learning [15,16].”
BackgroundMetacognitive Aspects of Problem Solving
Flavell, J. H. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781032646527-16 · Cited by 2,809 · see citing works
Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research
Hill, R. J., Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2065853 · Cited by 2,379 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Personal Competence, assessing perceived competency in AI usage, comprises five items from sources [59,62].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMultiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement
Pintrich, P. R. (2000) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.544 · Cited by 2,254 · cited 4× · see citing works
“As defined by Pintrich [33], self-regulation involves learners ’ ability to control, monitor, and manage their learning processes independently to attain their educational objectives.”
BackgroundInfluentialHandbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance
Schunk, D. H. (2011) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203839010 · Cited by 2,191 · see citing works
Zimmerman, B. J., & Pons, M. M. (1986) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312023004614 · Cited by 2,038 · see citing works
Conducting Semi‐Structured Interviews
Adams, W. C. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119171386.ch19 · Cited by 1,692 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The semi-structured format ensured flexibility, adaptability, and participant comfort [103 – 105].”
BackgroundSchraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8 · Cited by 1,529 · see citing works
Handbook of Metacognition in Education
Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (2009) · doi:10.4324/9780203876428 · Cited by 1,509 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Proficient use of metacognitive skills relies on applying metacognitive knowledge, encompassing students ’ ability to assess their progress in cognitive tasks and employ strategies to regulate their progress systematically [10,11].”
BackgroundAttaining self-regulation : a social cognitive perspective
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · Cited by 1,237 · see citing works
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001) · Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government) · Cited by 1,194 · see citing works
What factors contribute to the acceptance of artificial intelligence? A systematic review
Kelly, S., Kaye, S.-A., & Oviedo-Trespalacios, Ó. (2022) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2022.101925 · Cited by 1,027 · cited 6× · see citing works
“Additionally, perceived trust in AI systems and perceived AI usefulness are pivotal as they address students ’ confidence in the technology and their perception of its value in enhancing their metacognitive self-regulated learning [64].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001 · Cited by 1,003 · cited 3× · see citing works
“In line with established guidelines for evaluating convergent validity, our study carefully examined factor loadings, average variance extracted (AVE), and composite reliability (CR) [68,116,122].”
BackgroundDent, A. L., & Koenka, A. C. (2015) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9320-8 · Cited by 888 · see citing works
Strzelecki, A. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2209881 · Cited by 807 · cited 1× · see citing works
“N.A. Dahri et al. aid in regulating their thinking, motivation, and actions [69,70].”
BackgroundYilmaz, R., & Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G. (2023) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100147 · Cited by 745 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Yilmaz and Karaoglan Yilmaz [72] has proposed that AI-powered tools and environments can enhance metacognition and self-learning power by interacting with students, offering personalized support and feedback as they learn programming.”
BackgroundOpen AI in Education, the Responsible and Ethical Use of ChatGPT Towards Lifelong Learning
Mhlanga, D. (2023) · Sustainable Development Goals Series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-37776-1_17 · Cited by 718 · see citing works
Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843 · Cited by 717 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…use of AI tools in pre-service teacher education can be advantageous for pursuing a career in teaching, especially, ChatGPT is a generative AI tool created by OpenAI that has attracted a lot of attention due to its ability to give students real-time feedback, explanations, and advice [1,24,27,40].”
BackgroundAl-Adwan, A. S., Li, N., Al-Adwan, A., Abbasi, G. A., Albelbisi, N. A., & Habibi, A. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11816-3 · Cited by 637 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Venkatesh et al. and Davis conducted research that emphasizes the significance of intention as a predictor of technology adoption [91,96].”
BackgroundUnlocking the Power of ChatGPT: A Framework for Applying Generative AI in Education
Su (苏嘉红), J., & Yang (杨伟鹏), W. (2023) · ECNU Review of Education · doi:10.1177/20965311231168423 · Cited by 625 · see citing works
Rafique, H., Almagrabi, A. O., Shamim, A., Anwar, F., & Bashir, A. K. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103732 · Cited by 546 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…employed to understand the determinants of technology acceptance in various regions including Germany [50], US [51], Saudi Arabia [52], Pakistan [53], Malaysia [54], Turkey [55], Greece [56], Indonesia [57], South Korea [58], and China [56,57], and across different technology-related domains…”
BackgroundTeo, T. P., & Noyes, J. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.002 · Cited by 543 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Teo et al. [90] research explores the significance of reported enjoyment in the context of online learning systems [91].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialUnlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S., & Khan, I. H. (2023) · BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations · doi:10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100115 · Cited by 535 · cited 1× · see citing works
“During the performance phase, learners are tasked with actively participating in learning activities and fine-tuning their learning approaches to achieve their objectives [17,35,36].”
BackgroundLiu, G., & Ma, C. (2024) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2023.2240316 · Cited by 511 · see citing works
Determinants of Intention to Use ChatGPT for Educational Purposes: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA
Foroughi, B., Senali, M. G., Iranmanesh, M., Khanfar, A. A. A., Ghobakhloo, M., Annamalai, N., & Naghmeh‐Abbaspour, B. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2226495 · Cited by 481 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This was done per the well-established two-step approach suggested by other research [116,115,117,118].”
MethodInvestigating the impact of user trust on the adoption and use of ChatGPT: Survey analysis
Choudhury, A., & Shamszare, H. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/47184 · Cited by 470 · cited 3× · see citing works
“People must feel safe and confident in the technology ’ s skills and moral application, which makes trust a crucial component of technology adoption [82].”
BackgroundInfluentialJin, S.-H., Im, K., Yoo, M., Roll, I., & Seo, K. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00406-5 · Cited by 465 · cited 6× · see citing works
“Structured interviews were utilized to provide a context-specific approach, addressing the limitations of surveys [1,10].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAl-Rahmi, W. M., Yahaya, N., Aldraiweesh, A. A., Alamri, M. M., Aljarboa, N. A., Alturki, U., & Aljeraiwi, A. A. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2899368 · Cited by 435 · cited 6× · see citing works
“Previous studies supported personal competency on ChatGPT acceptance [62,63].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialMailizar, M., Burg, D., & Maulina, S. (2021) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10557-5 · Cited by 420 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…acceptance in various regions including Germany [50], US [51], Saudi Arabia [52], Pakistan [53], Malaysia [54], Turkey [55], Greece [56], Indonesia [57], South Korea [58], and China [56,57], and across different technology-related domains such as e-learning, remote education, massive open online…”
BackgroundAcceptance of artificial intelligence among pre-service teachers: A multigroup analysis
Zhang, C., Schießl, J., Plößl, L., Hofmann, F., & Gläser-Zikuda, M. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00420-7 · Cited by 413 · cited 1× · see citing works
“TAM has been extensively employed to understand the determinants of technology acceptance in various regions including Germany [50], US [51], Saudi Arabia [52], Pakistan [53], Malaysia [54], Turkey [55], Greece [56], Indonesia [57], South Korea [58], and China [56,57], and across different…”
BackgroundChang, D. H., Lin, M. P.-C., Hajian, S., & Wang, Q. Q. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su151712921 · Cited by 370 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) holds great promise for enhancing metacognitive self-regulated learning [2,28,29].”
BackgroundConversational commerce: entering the next stage of AI-powered digital assistants
Balakrishnan, J., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2024) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-021-04049-5 · Cited by 301 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This construct reflects how the user perceives the AI tool ’ s ability to offer perceptive and intelligent assistance for metacognitive self-regulated learning [94].”
BackgroundKhan, I. U., Hameed, Z., Yu, Y., Islam, T., Sheikh, Z., & Khan, S. U. (2017) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.009 · Cited by 289 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Trust is crucial to technology adoption, as shown in the literature and aligned with studies [80,81].”
BackgroundResultLai, C. Y., Cheung, K. Y., & Chan, C. S. (2023) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100178 · Cited by 280 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Furthermore, studies by Lai et al. emphasize how important metacognition is to enhance learning results [35].”
BackgroundWu, T., Lee, H., Li, P., Huang, C.-N., & Huang, Y. (2023) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331231191125 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Assessing Health Students' Attitudes and Usage of ChatGPT in Jordan: Validation Study
Sallam, M., Salim, N. A., Barakat, M., Al-Mahzoum, K., Al-Tammemi, A. B., Malaeb, D., Hallit, R., & Hallit, S. (2023) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/48254 · Cited by 234 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The term "intention to use ChatGPT" describes a person ’ s desire and resolve to utilize ChatGPT for metacognitive self-regulated learning [87].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialMolenaar, I. (2022) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100070 · Cited by 217 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A key component of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) is behavioral intention, which emphasizes how important it is for students to be willing and determined to use ChatGPT for their metacognitive self-regulated learning [44,67].”
BackgroundExtending UTAUT2 toward acceptance of mobile learning in the context of higher education
Arain, A. A., Hussain, Z., Rizvi, W. H., & Vighio, M. S. (2019) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-019-00685-8 · Cited by 210 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Social influence on technology uptake is supported by previous research [41,77,78].”
BackgroundResultYoon, H.-Y. (2016) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2016.08.003 · Cited by 182 · cited 6× · see citing works
“Personal competence, reflecting students ’ self-perceived skills in using AI for learning, assumes significance in this context, as does the influence of peers and social networks, encapsulated by the social influence factor [51, 58,68].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialChatGPT: The cognitive effects on learning and memory
Bai, L., Liu, X., & Su, J. (2023) · Brain‐X · doi:10.1002/brx2.30 · Cited by 182 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Although AI is becoming increasingly common in education [24,26, 29], it is unclear how pre-service instructors in higher education perceive these tools and how effective they are.”
BackgroundAltalhi, M. M. (2020) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10317-x · Cited by 178 · cited 1× · see citing works
“[110 – 112].”
Al-Maatouk, Q., Othman, M. S., Aldraiweesh, A., Alturki, U., Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Aljeraiwi, A. A. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2990420 · Cited by 177 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…understand the determinants of technology acceptance in various regions including Germany [50], US [51], Saudi Arabia [52], Pakistan [53], Malaysia [54], Turkey [55], Greece [56], Indonesia [57], South Korea [58], and China [56,57], and across different technology-related domains such as…”
BackgroundUsing chatbots for English language learning in higher education
Annamalai, N., Rashid, R. A., Hashmi, U. M., Mohamed, M. H., Alqaryouti, M. H., & Sadeq, A. E. (2023) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100153 · Cited by 165 · cited 5× · see citing works
“First, TAM is ideally suited for analyzing AI adoption within the framework of metacognitive self-regulated learning, having been originally designed to forecast and explain consumer acceptance and usage of information technology [45,47 – 49].”
BackgroundInfluentialHamzah, H., Hamzah, M. I., & Zulkifli, H. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14020813 · Cited by 161 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Meta-cognitive self-regulation learning is the term for this [98].”
BackgroundLi, K. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15065221 · Cited by 157 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The model explains that PU and PEOU shape individuals ’ attitudes and both PU and attitudes toward technology usage predict BI [46,60].”
BackgroundInvestigating the drivers and barriers to MOOCs adoption: The perspective of TAM
Al‐Adwan, A. S. (2020) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10250-z · Cited by 156 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Many important aspects affect students ’ behavioral intention to utilize ChatGPT in the educational context [65], which influences the adoption of AI for metacognitive self-regulated learning [63,66].”
BackgroundExploring factors affecting the adoption of MOOC in Generation Z using extended UTAUT2 model
Meet, R. K., Kala, D., & Al‐Adwan, A. S. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11052-1 · Cited by 137 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To assess the reliability of the questionnaire, a pilot test was administered to 35 pre-service students, and the Cronbach ’ s alpha method, with a recommended cutoff point of 0.7, was employed to evaluate its internal consistency [114,115].”
MethodInfluentialLosinski, M. L., Cuenca‐Carlino, Y., Zablocki, M., & Teagarden, J. M. (2014) · Behavioral Disorders · doi:10.17988/0198-7429-40.1.52 · Cited by 135 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Some interventions, such as self-regulated strategy development, have demonstrated the potential to improve academic skills in students with learning difficulties [22].”
BackgroundFu-hai, A., Xi, L., & Yu, J. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11959-3 · Cited by 132 · cited 3× · see citing works
“People actively employ self-regulation processes and metacognitive strategies to enhance their learning experiences [73].”
BackgroundTzafilkou, K., Perifanou, M. A., & Economides, A. A. (2021) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10604-1 · Cited by 121 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…of technology acceptance in various regions including Germany [50], US [51], Saudi Arabia [52], Pakistan [53], Malaysia [54], Turkey [55], Greece [56], Indonesia [57], South Korea [58], and China [56,57], and across different technology-related domains such as e-learning, remote education,…”
BackgroundAl-Rahmi, W. M., Al‐Adwan, A. S., Al-Maatouk, Q., Othman, M. S., Alsaud, A. R., Almogren, A. S., & Al-Rahmi, A. M. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15108144 · Cited by 116 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The construct reliability, AVE, and CR are presented in Table 3, and factor loading values, as presented in Table 2, indicate the rigorous evaluation of the measurement model ’ s reliability and validity in our study [61,77,124].”
MethodExploring College Students' Attitudes and Self-Efficacy of Mobile Learning
Yang, S.-H. (2012) · The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Can ChatGPT Pass High School Exams on English Language Comprehension?
de Winter, J. C. F. (2024) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-023-00372-z · Cited by 115 · cited 2× · see citing works
“It ’ s gained attention in creative writing, coding, teaching innovation, sentiment analysis, and annotation tasks [31].”
BackgroundAn, S., Eck, T., & Yim, H. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15010832 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Internet banking adoption under Technology Acceptance Model—Evidence from Cambodian users
Ly, B., & Ly, R. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100224 · Cited by 101 · cited 2× · see citing works
“[84], and [90].”
BackgroundAn Overview: Metacognition in Education
Mahdavi, M. (2014) · International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Research · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Factors affecting undergraduates’ selection of online library resources in academic tasks
Joo, S., & Choi, N. (2015) · Library Hi Tech · doi:10.1108/lht-01-2015-0008 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Dahri, N. A., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Almogren, A. S., Yahaya, N., Vighio, M. S., Al-Maatouk, Q., Al-Rahmi, A. M., & Al‐Adwan, A. S. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15118514 · Cited by 87 · cited 3× · see citing works
“This study provides a significant gap in the literature by analyzing the factors influencing pre-service teachers ’ decision to use ChatGPT and examining their adoption of the AI tool for metacognitive self-regulated learning [10,28].”
BackgroundNa, S., Heo, S., Choi, W., Kim, C., & Whang, S.-W. (2023) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings13102518 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Dahri, N. A., Vighio, M. S., Bather, J. D., & Arain, A. A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132313222 · Cited by 81 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Learners benefit from actively posing and addressing questions pertinent to their studies to reach their desired learning outcomes [37,38].”
BackgroundAlyoussef, I. Y. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13137374 · Cited by 79 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Reliability and continuing technology usage are strongly correlated with enjoyment [89].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialExploring student satisfaction and acceptance of e-learning technologies in Saudi higher education
Alqahtani, M. A., Alamri, M. M., Sayaf, A. M., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.939336 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Tayan, O., Hassan, A., Khankan, K., & Askool, S. (2023) · Machine Learning with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.mlwa.2023.100513 · Cited by 75 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Tayan et al. [39] critically examine the integration of AI chatbots like ChatGPT into higher education technology courses.”
BackgroundLearning with Generative Artificial Intelligence Within a Network of Co-Regulation
Lodge, J. M., De Barba, P., & Broadbent, J. (2024) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.20.7.02 · Cited by 73 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Further, Lodge et al. [44] explore the transformative potential of generative AI, such as ChatGPT, in education, proposing a "co-regulation" model challenging traditional student-teacher dynamics; AI ’ s role includes providing personalized feedback, suggesting resources, and fostering…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialIntention and barriers to use MOOCs: An investigation among the post graduate students in India
Mohan, M. M., Upadhyaya, P., & Rajasekharan Pillai, K. (2020) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10215-2 · Cited by 68 · cited 2× · see citing works
“[110,111].”
ResultBaroni, I., Re Calegari, G., Scandolari, D., & Celino, I. (2022) · Human Computation · doi:10.15346/hc.v9i1.134 · Cited by 65 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Trust is crucial to technology adoption, as shown in the literature and aligned with studies [80,81].”
BackgroundResultImpacts of Interview as Research Instrument of Data Collection in Social Sciences
Monday, T. U. (2020) · Journal of Digital Art & Humanities · doi:10.33847/2712-8148.1.1_2 · Cited by 64 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The semi-structured format ensured flexibility, adaptability, and participant comfort [103 – 105].”
BackgroundNavarro, R., Vega, V., Bayona, H., Bernal, V. M. G., & García, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1227956 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Jauk, S., Kramer, D., Avian, A., Berghold, A., Leodolter, W., & Schulz, S. (2021) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-021-01727-6 · Cited by 59 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The post-task reflection sessions were an integral component of data collection, allowing participants to provide qualitative insights and share their experiences regarding using ChatGPT for metacognitive self-regulated learning [86].”
BackgroundWang, C.-Y., & Lin, J. J. H. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107721 · Cited by 55 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Wang and Lin [8] investigate the potential of AI as a tool for analyzing and supporting self-regulated learning (SRL).”
BackgroundInfluentialTechnology Acceptance and Performance in Online Learning Environments: Impact of Self-Regulation
Tabak, F., & Nguyen, N. T. H. (2013) · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Towards Adaptive E-Learning among University Students: by Applying Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
Alamri, M. M., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahaya, N., Al-Rahmi, A. M., Abualrejal, H. M., Zeki, A. M., & Al-Maatouk, Q. (2019) · International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology · doi:10.35940/ijeat.f1043.0986s319 · Cited by 53 · cited 8× · see citing works
“This construct reflects the application of metacognitive knowledge and skills to maximize and manage one ’ s learning [63,66].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAlmogren, A. S., & Aljammaz, N. A. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1050532 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Tian, Y., & Wang, X. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.986800 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Mobile-Based Training and Certification Framework for Teachers’ Professional Development
Dahri, N. A., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Almogren, A. S., Yahaya, N., Vighio, M. S., & Al-Maatouk, Q. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15075839 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Dahri, N. A., Yahaya, N., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Almogren, A. S., & Vighio, M. S. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12434-9 · Cited by 42 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Learners benefit from actively posing and addressing questions pertinent to their studies to reach their desired learning outcomes [37,38].”
BackgroundNa, S., Heo, S., Choi, W., Han, S., & Kim, C. (2023) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings13041066 · Cited by 38 · cited 2× · see citing works
“[62,101].”
BackgroundUsability Evaluation of Mobile App for the Sustainable Professional Development of Teachers
Dahri, N. A., Vighio, M. S., Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Alismaiel, O. A. (2022) · International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) · doi:10.3991/ijim.v16i16.32015 · Cited by 30 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Notably, the perception of enjoyment has been consistently linked to the intention to use computers [24,89,90,93].”
BackgroundSOCIAL INFLUENCE IN TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION RESEARCH: A LITERATURE REVIEW AND RESEARCH AGENDAPreprint
Graf‐Vlachy, L., & Buhtz, K. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Assessing the Impact of Mobile-Based Training on Teachers’ Achievement and Usage Attitude
Dahri, N. A., Vighio, M. S., Alismaiel, O. A., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2022) · International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) · doi:10.3991/ijim.v16i09.30519 · Cited by 25 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Social influence on technology uptake is supported by previous research [41,77,78].”
BackgroundMethodResultChildren's metamemory: A review of the literature and implications for the classroom
Karably, K., & Zabrucky, K. M. (2009) · lnternational Electronic Journal of Elementary Education · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Zha, X., Zhang, J., & Yan, Y. (2014) · Journal of Librarianship and Information Science · doi:10.1177/0961000614532677 · Cited by 23 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The behavioral psychology research of Fishbein and Ajzen [97] offers a theoretical framework for comprehending how attitude affects behavioral intentions.”
BackgroundEncouraging engagement: video-conference augmentation of online distance learning environments
Starr‐Glass, D. (2020) · On the Horizon The International Journal of Learning Futures · doi:10.1108/oth-06-2020-0020 · Cited by 23 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In the Chinese context, an et al. [73,74] discovered that technology acceptance significantly impacted middle school students ’ self-regulated learning (SRL), with information management.”
BackgroundStudents’ Intention toward Self-Regulated Learning under Blended Learning Setting: PLS-SEM Approach
Jiang, Y., Wang, P., Li, Q., & Li, Y. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141610140 · Cited by 23 · cited 1× · see citing works
“[51,58,113].”
University students’ acceptance of mobile learning: A comparative study in Turkey and Kyrgyzstan
Adanır, G. A., & Muhametjanova, G. (2021) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10620-1 · Cited by 21 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…determinants of technology acceptance in various regions including Germany [50], US [51], Saudi Arabia [52], Pakistan [53], Malaysia [54], Turkey [55], Greece [56], Indonesia [57], South Korea [58], and China [56,57], and across different technology-related domains such as e-learning, remote…”
BackgroundA survey on technology supported collaborative learning tools and techniques in teacher education
Dahri, N. A., Vighio, M. S., & Dahri, M. H. (2019) · International Conference on Information Science and Communication Technology (ICISCT) · doi:10.1109/cisct.2019.8777421 · Cited by 20 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) holds great promise for enhancing metacognitive self-regulated learning [2,28,29].”
BackgroundRajan, K. K., & Pandit, A. S. (2022) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03578-2 · Cited by 14 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Moreover, the flexibility and convenience offered by computer-assisted and mobile-assisted learning can enhance students ’ enjoyment and self-efficacy or personal competency, meta-cognition and self-learning skills ultimately resulting in increased participation in the learning process [71].”
BackgroundA Glimpse in ChatGPT Capabilities and its impact for AI researchPreprint
Joublin, F., Ceravola, A., Deigmoeller, J., Gienger, M., Franzius, M., & Eggert, J. P. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.06087 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Ocak, C., Kopcha, T. J., & Dey, R. (2023) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100146 · Cited by 13 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Furthermore, LLMs have evolved beyond text and can now interpret and generate content across multiple formats. their impact is already being felt in the fields of education and research [8,25].”
BackgroundTran, H. H., Capps, D. K., & Hodges, G. W. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14105923 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Ming, G. K., & Mansor, M. B. (2023) · Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences · doi:10.55057/ajress.2023.5.4.6 · Cited by 8 · cited 3× · see citing works
“A limited amount of research has focused on pre-service teachers, a distinct population with particular expectations and characteristics, despite numerous studies examining educators ’ and students ’ acceptance of technology [42,43].”
BackgroundIqbal, S., Hanif, R., Ali, F., Tahir, M., Minhas, R., Yasmeen, R., Khokhar, A., & Laique, T. (2021) · Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences · doi:10.53350/pjmhs2115123498 · Cited by 7 · cited 2× · see citing works
“[96].”
BackgroundAdams, L. L. (2014) · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 113 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- [7]Lai E.R. Metacognition: a literature review, always learn Pearson Res. Rep. 24 2011 1 40
- [10]Muijs D., Bokhove C., Metacognition and self-regulation: evidence review, Educ. Endow. Found. (2020). report 2020.
- [108]Alshenqeeti H. Interviewing as a data collection method: a critical review, English Linguist Res. 3 2014 39 45
- [115]Hair J.F. Black W.C. Babin B.J. Anderson R.E. Tatham R.L. Multivariate Data Analysis vol. 6 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River
- [122]Carpinelli J. Kimmel H. Hirsch L. Burr-Alexander L. Rockland R. Oshea M. A rubric to evaluate standards based lesson plans and students' achievement of the standards 2008 Annu. Conf. Expo 2008 13 98
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Almogren, A. S., Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Dahri, N. A. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31887 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Schei, O. M., Møgelvang, A., & Ludvigsen, K. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14080922 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
“Dahri et al. [30] used an extended TAM model, finding a high acceptance of ChatGPT among university students.”
Zong, Y., & Yang, L. (2025) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12925 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Almulla, M. A. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32220 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
“Satisfied students exhibit higher levels of persistence and achieve better learning outcomes, adopting a positive learning environment [34,35].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAlshammarı, S. H., & Babu, E. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-91634-4 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
“Technology solutions that students perceive as easy to use, such as ChatGPT, are more likely to be used and to interact with 30 .”
Sardi, J., Darmansyah, Candra, O., Yuliana, D. F., Habibullah, Yanto, D. T. P., & Eliza, F. (2025) · International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP) · doi:10.3991/ijep.v15i1.53379 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Soomro, R., Al-rahmi, W., Dahri, N. A., Almuqren, L., Almogren, A. S., & Aldaijy, A. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-86464-3 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Al-kfairy, M. (2024) · Applied System Innovation · doi:10.3390/asi7060110 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
“This method involves coding the data and organizing them into meaningful categories that reflect the key factors influencing the adoption of ChatGPT [15,21].”
InfluentialDahri, N. A., Yahaya, N., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Almuqren, L., Almgren, A. S., Alshimai, A., & Al‐Adwan, A. S. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3560567 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
“Teachers often struggle to incorporate 21st-century teaching approaches due to a lack of knowledge and training, further compounding these issues [12], [13].”
Zhang, C., Hu, M., Wu, W., Kamran, F., & Wang, X. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12905-7 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
“Likewise, Dahri et al. (2024) investigated the acceptance of ChatGPT as a metacognitive self-regulated learning (MSRL) tool among 300 pre-service teachers.”
Iqbal, J., Hashmi, Z. F., Asghar, M. Z., & Abid, M. N. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-01676-x · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Banihashem, S. K., Bond, M., Bergdahl, N., Khosravi, H., & Noroozi, O. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00548-8 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
“Additionally, AI aids metacognition by providing feedback, helping with study planning, and assessing progress, thereby fostering self-awareness and strategic learning (Afzaal et al., 2024; Dahri et al., 2024).”
Soomro, R. B., Memon, S. G., Dahri, N. A., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Aldriwish, K., Salameh, A. A. M., Al‐Adwan, A. S., & Saleem, A. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16177351 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Balaskas, S., Tsiantos, V., Chatzifotiou, S., & Rigou, M. (2025) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16020082 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
“These findings contribute to theoretical discussions on the evolving dynamics in the adoption of AI, where utility alone may not be sufficient without addressing users’ basic concerns [21,26,32].”
Ocen, S., Elasu, J., Aarakit, S. M., & Olupot, C. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1530247 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Jeilani, A., & Abubakar, S. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1548900 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Ursavaş, Ö. F., Yalçın, Y., İslamoğlu, H., Bakır-Yalçın, E., & Cukurova, M. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00535-z · Cited by 69 · see citing works
“This finding indicates that fostering positive attitudes toward GenAI tools is critical for driving their adoption and use among university students, consistent with previous research (Dahri et al., 2024; Nazaretsky et al., 2022; Zou & Huang, 2023).”
InfluentialHuang, L., & Zhao, Y. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1669247 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Large language models: Expectations for semantics-driven systems engineering
Buchmann, R. A., Eder, J., Fill, H.-G., Frank, U., Karagiannis, D., Laurenzi, E., Mylopoulos, J., Plexousakis, D., & Santos, M. Y. (2024) · Data & Knowledge Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.datak.2024.102324 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Aldraiweesh, A., & Alturki, U. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3534099 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
“These tools, powered by large language models (LLMs), enable students to access real-time, contextually relevant explanations, generate creative content, and receive writing assistance [59], [60].”
Li, J., & Lv, C. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0308267 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Exploring the influence of ChatGPT on student academic success and career readiness
Dahri, N. A., Yahaya, N., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13148-2 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
“Furthermore, research has shown that ChatGPT usage can have a significant impact on user outcomes, such as improved academic performance (Dahri et al., 2024a; Lund et al., 2023), enhanced customer satisfaction (Rathore, 2023), and increased user engagement (Choudhury & Shamszare, 2023).”
InfluentialŞimşek, A. S., Cengiz, G. Ş. T., & Bal, M. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13591-9 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“Additionally, Dahri et al. (2024) emphasized that addressing teachers’ cognitive and practical needs enhances their willingness to adopt technology.”
InfluentialXia, Q., Liu, Q., Tlili, A., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105465 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
García-Alonso, E. M., León-Mejía, A. C., Sánchez-Cabrero, R., & Guzmán-Ordaz, R. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs14070612 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Kim, M., Kim, J., Knotts, T. L., & Albers, N. D. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13398-8 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“For example, Dahri et al. ( 2024 ) explored the acceptance of ChatGPT in supporting metacognitive self-regulated learning (MSRL) using an extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM).”
Liu, F., Chang, X., Zhu, Q., Huang, Y., Li, Y., & Wang, H. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-06232-1 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“As peer-to-peer communication is an important way for people to obtain new technology, the adoption of LLMs could be influenced by social impact with network externalities [21, 22].”
BackgroundTohănean, D. I., Vulpe, A.-M., Mijaică, R., & Alexe, D. I. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15179826 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Ning, Y., Zheng, H., Wu, H., Jin, Z. M., Chang, H., & Wijaya, T. T. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13477-w · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Understanding Teachers’ Adoption of AI Technologies: An Empirical Study from Chinese Middle Schools
Zhao, J., Li, S., & Zhang, J. (2025) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems13040302 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“Furthermore, under the theme of acceptance of AI teaching technologies, novel latent variables—such as Teacher’s Trust [24,27], Subjective Norms [28,29], Anxiety [27,30], and Perceived Risk [13,31]—have emerged, alongside conventional variables like Performance Expectancy, Facilitating Conditions,…”
He, A. J., Zhang, Z., Anand, P., & McMinn, S. (2024) · Journal of Asian Public Policy · doi:10.1080/17516234.2024.2447195 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
“In the context of academic learning, learners who have positive attitudes towards the usefulness of ChatGPT tend to demonstrate a higher level of behavioural intention that positively predicts their actual use of it (Abdaljaleel et al., 2024; Almogren et al., 2024; Dahri et al., 2024).”
Uludağ, F., Kılıç, E., & Çelik, H. E. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05641-x · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“Various studies (Algera fi et al. 2023; Zhang et al. 2023; Boubker, 2024; Dahri et al. 2024; Albayati, 2024; Abdalla, 2024) emphasized that SI has an effect on PU.”
Alwakid, W. N., Dahri, N. A., Humayun, M., & Alwakid, G. N. (2025) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems13070517 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Alqurni, J. S. (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2026.1738774 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
A Systematic Review of User Attitudes Toward GenAI: Influencing Factors and Industry Perspectives
Chen, J., Wei, X., Xie, Q., Hu, A., Qiao, Y., Wan, R., & Liu, Y. (2025) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence13070078 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Şengül, T., Sarıköse, S., Uncu, B., & Kaya, N. (2025) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104516 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Ngo, T. T. A., Vo, T. T. A., & Phan, M. T. (2025) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105789 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
AI support in self‐regulated learning: A decade of technological evolution and meta‐analysis
Xu, J. H., Luo, Y., Wang, C., Wang, M., & Wu, Y. (2026) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.70058 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
AI Adoption for Collaboration: Factors Influencing Inclusive Learning Adoption in Higher Education
Alyoussef, I. Y., Drwish, A. M., Albakheet, F. A., Alqahtani, R. H. A., & Technology, A. A. A. E. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3567656 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“AI enables personalized instruction, real-time feedback, and information-driven understandings, empowering educators to deliver tailored educational experiences that optimize student learning outcomes [10], [11], [12].”
InfluentialAbdi, A.-N. M., Omar, A. M., Ahmed, M. H., & Ahmed, A. A. (2025) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2025.2460250 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“Moreover, consistent with the recent literature, the study found that PEU is positively and significantly associated with the students ’ behavioral intention to use ChatGPT (BIU) for academic reasons (Almogren et al., 2024; Dahri et al., 2024; Yu et al., 2024).”
InfluentialStudents’ Reliance on AI in Higher Education: Identifying Contributing Factors
Pitts, G., Rani, N., Mildort, W., & Cook, E.-M. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-12773-0_9 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Huang, W., & Hew, K. F. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2024.3523199 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Koteczki, R., & Balassa, B. E. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15081044 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Salam, U. (2024) · Computers in the Schools · doi:10.1080/07380569.2024.2446239 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“Dahri et al. (2024) explored the TAM of the acceptance of ChatGPT for Metacognitive Self-Regulated Learning (MSRL).”
Abduljawad, S. A. (2025) · International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.4018/ijcallt.367276 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Dahri, N. A., Yahaya, N., Vighio, M. S., & Jumaat, N. F. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13539-z · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“In this way, teachers can integrate AI-driven applications to create an inclusive classroom envi - ronment that helps cater to diverse student needs and enables higher-order thinking skills for all students (Dahri et al., 2024a, b, c , d ).”
InfluentialOyundari, B., Yondon, C., Enkhbat, R., Darkhijav, B., & Rahman, M. (2025) · Future Business Journal · doi:10.1186/s43093-025-00504-y · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Gong, Y., Xu, C., Luo, S., & Lin, J. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-03298-9 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“Teachers’ acceptance of ChatGPT is closely tied to their teaching roles: novice educators are more likely to rely on AI for teaching design, whereas experienced educators tend to view it as a supplementary tool 46 .”
Zhang, Q., Pan, X., & Fan, J. (2025) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.70336 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Kukanja, M. (2024) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems12120526 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“Empirical research has validated these modified models across a variety of applications, demonstrating their effectiveness in predicting user acceptance [58,59].”
Sun, X., Dou, W., & Yang, Y. (2025) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105956 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Bukar, U., Sayeed, M. S., Razak, S. F. A., Yogarayan, S., & Sneesl, R. (2024) · Education sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14090959 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Bai, L. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-024-07167-y · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“The integration of these frameworks captures both the environmental influences and rational decision pro - cesses that shape user behavior in educational technology adoption (Dahri et al., 2024).”
Sasongko, A. T., Ekhsan, M., & Fatchan, M. (2025) · Telematics and Informatics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.teler.2025.100192 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Yang, S. C. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2026.108933 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Alwakid, W. N., Dahri, N. A., Humayun, M., & Alwakid, G. N. (2025) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101252 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Alwakid, W., & Dahri, N. A. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies : Official Journal of the IFIP technical committee on Education · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13777-1 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“SEM is well known for its capacity to test sophisticated theoretical models and measure latent constructs through multiple observed indica - tors (Dahri et al., 2024a, b , 2025c; Soormo et al., 2024).”
Liu, M., Zhang, L. J., & Neufeld, T. J. E. (2025) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2025.2549754 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Assessing ChatGPT Adoption in Higher Education: An Empirical Analysis
Dorobăț, I., & Corbea, A. M. I. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14234739 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Zhang, N., Wong, W. L., & Barrot, J. S. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-21205-0 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“The two attitudinal drivers that predict behavioural intention in extended TAM research on ChatGPT adoption 13 .”
Changes in Public Perception of ChatGPT: A Text Mining Perspective Based on Social Media
Liu, Y.-T., & Lyu, Z. (2024) · International journal of human computer interactions · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2406966 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“Partial scholars based on unstructured questionnaires employed qualitative analysis methods to investigate perceptions of ChatGPT, compensating for the drawbacks of structured questionnaires (Dahri et al., 2024; Wei et al., 2024).”
Generative AI and Its Potential Impact on Humanity
Nasr, R. S., & El‐Deeb, S. (2025) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.70024 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
What Shapes Learners’ Trust in AI? A Meta-Analytic Review of Its Antecedents and Consequences
Cui, Y., Zeng, M. L., Du, X. K., & He, W. M. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3611367 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“Prior research has consistently emphasized that trust in technology is a key determinant of users’ willingness to accept and use new systems [83], [109], as it helps alleviate learners’ concerns about potential risks and uncertainties associated with novel technologies [110].”
Ingason, H. Þ., Aaltonen, K., Asmundarson, A. S., Friðgeirsson, Þ. V., Huemann, D., Huemann, M., Kujala, J., Lampela, H., Mancini, M., Mariani, C., et al. (2025) · Project Leadership and Society · doi:10.1016/j.plas.2025.100193 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Dahri, N. A., Dahri, F. H., Laghari, A. A., & Javed, M. (2025) · Complex Engineering Systems · doi:10.20517/ces.2025.07 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Foresight for Sustainable Last-Mile Delivery: A Delphi-Based Scenario Study for Smart Cities in 2030
Mutambik, I. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17156660 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Exploring students’ perceptions of generative AI-generated feedback in learning programming
Khor, E. T., Chan, L., Koh, E., & SEOW, P. S. K. (2025) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2025.2564894 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“…2024), other studies in different educational and cultural contexts find that subjective norms instead indirectly influence students’ behavioural intentions through its positive effect on students’ acceptance attitudes towards using GenAI (Albayati, 2024; dahri et al., 2024; Tiwari et al., 2024).”
Sun, Y., Li, L., Zhang, X., Chen, X., Deng, S., & Hu, X. (2026) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-026-03989-6 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Liu, H., Fang, X., Cui, Q., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2026) · Review of Education · doi:10.1002/rev3.70141 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Dahri, N. A., Yahaya, N., & Vighio, M. S. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13583-9 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“This hypothesis aligns with research showing that SRL enhances students’engagement and performance in collaborative settings, driving group learning success (Dahri et al., 2024b; Zimmerman, 1989).”
Zhao, J., Yao, H., & Zhang, J. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13661-y · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Over the last few years, there has been growing academic interest in artificial intelli - gence (AI) and how to apply it effectively in the teaching process (Dahri et al., 2024).”
InfluentialAL-Qadri, A. H., & Al-khresheh, M. H. (2025) · The Electronic Library · doi:10.1108/el-12-2024-0391 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Tian, J., & Zhang, R. (2026) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-026-07153-8 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“…use AI as a cognitive scaffold — requesting explanations, counter-arguments, and alternative perspectives — and then actively interrogating these outputs, which can stimulate evaluation and metacognitive monitoring in academic tasks (Cheng and Jiang, 2022; Dahri et al., 2024; Wang and Fan, 2025).”
Giray, L., Fabros, B. G., Villarama, J. A., Gumalin, D. L., & Saavedra, J. B. (2025) · Internet Reference Services Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10875301.2025.2542212 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“In their study on ChatGPT’s acceptability, Dahri et al. (2024) revealed how personal competency and social elements support the aim of utilizing AI in metacognitive self-regulated learning among pre-service teachers.”
Noor, N., Tong, A., & Zainol, Z. (2025) · Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society · doi:10.1108/jices-03-2025-0071 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Subuhpoto, S., Liu, G., Su, W., & Aziz, F. (2025) · The Electronic Library · doi:10.1108/el-03-2025-0077 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Luo, Y., Zhou, G., & Cui, Y. (2026) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13885-y · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Adekoya, O. D., Ajonbadi, H. A., Mordi, C., Samuel, P., & Nguyen, H. (2026) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.70138 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Promoting Interdisciplinary Learning With Generative AI Through Self‐Regulated Scaffolding
Xia, Q., Yang, Y., Wang, W., & Yin, H. (2026) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70214 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Ateş, H., & GÜNDÜZALP, C. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13480-1 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Research confirms that ease of use significantly influences perceptions of usefulness, reinforcing the role of usability in technology adoption (Al-Adwan et al., 2024; Ateş & Yilmaz, 2024; Dahri et al., 2024; Venkatesh & Davis, 2000).”
AI misuse and passiveness of students in medical education
Hosseini, S. M. (2025) · AJP Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00164.2025 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Bećirović, S., Augustín, M., Mattoš, B., & Dančo, J. (2026) · Discover Computing · doi:10.1007/s10791-026-10042-y · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Sanchez, J. M. P., Sumalinog, G. G., Mananay, J. A., Goles, C. E., Alejandro, I. M. V., & Fernandez, C. B. (2025) · STEM Education · doi:10.3934/steme.2025045 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Khojasteh, L., Karimian, Z., Nasiri, E., Kafipour, R., & Farahmandi, A. Y. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-08288-z · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Data analysis was conducted using SPSS software, version 26, for Exploratory Factor Analysis.”
Li, F., Chen, J., Shao, T., & Sun, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1756708 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
DeepL Translate can be a scaffold to speaking fluency: Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
Imran, M. C., Marzuki, M., Sasabobe, L., Jubhari, Y., & Sujarwo, S. (2025) · EDULEC Education Language and Culture Journal · doi:10.56314/edulec.v5i1.302 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Alsaedi, N. S. (2025) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/17302 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The impact of DeepSeek’s perceived interactivity on medical students’ self-directed learning ability
Ju, Y., Li, J., Zhang, X., Wu, M., Pang, X., Li, Z., Wang, J., Li, J., Zhang, Y., & Dai, X. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-33780-3 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Many surveyed educators stated they use AI technologies due to positive peer experiences 60 .”
Büyükeke, A. (2025) · Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.32329/uad.1728785 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Munusamy, S., Rao, S., & Rajagopalan, V. (2026) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.1016/j.ajpe.2026.101943 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Huang, F., & Zhang, H. (2026) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amag009 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Examining the use of artificial intelligence in pre-service teacher education
Ponomarenko, E. B., Sergeeva, O. V., ZHELTUKHINA, M. R., Baranova, K. M., Budkevich, R. L., & Melnik, M. V. (2026) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/18458 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Empowering Learners: GenIA and Their Impact on Self-regulated learning
Safsouf, Y., & Mouachi, R. (2024) · ITM Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/itmconf/20246901004 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“The study revealed a strong acceptance of GenAI chatbots among trainee teachers as tools to support self-regulated learning (SRL) in teaching [18].”
Predicting the actual use of artificial intelligence features of Apple Vision Pro using PLS-SEM
Al-Maroof, R. S., Tawafak, R. M., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alhashmi, K. A., & Alyoussef, I. Y. (2025) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/16208 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Exploring educators’ perspectives on ChatGPT integration in engineering and management education
Bhaskar, P., Khan, M., & Bhaskar, P. (2025) · Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society · doi:10.1108/jices-04-2025-0088 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
AI in Tourism Education: A Review of AIGC Teaching and Evaluation Tools
Tan, Z., Yang, Y., Yang, X., Liu, X., Wei, Q., & Kong, L. H. (2025) · International Conference on Education and Training Technologies (ICETT) · doi:10.1109/icett66247.2025.11136881 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“The integration of AI in education has transformed traditional teaching and learning paradigms through several key applications [33].”
AI-based career management to improve the quality of decision making in higher education
Fawaid, A., Baharun, H., Hamzah, M., Rohimah, R., Munawwaroh, I., & Putri, D. F. (2025) · IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC) · doi:10.1109/isec64801.2025.11147274 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“With a system that can analyze data quickly and accurately, higher education can provide more targeted career recommendations for students, based on their abilities, interests, and relevant job market trends[27].”
Kılıç, E., Almasri, F., & Çelik, H. E. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100486 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Lu, H., & Li, X. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-06392-5 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“In terms of AI device adoption, Dahri et al. (2024) integrated factors such as perceived AI trust and perceived AI capability into the TAM to study ChatGPT usage behavioral intentions.”
Zahrani, A. A. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3647788 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“For example, digital infrastructure has been shown to influence e-learning adoption [76], [77], cloud computing acceptance [78], [82], and AI integration in organizational [79].”
- Authors
- Dahri, N. A., Yahaya, N., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Aldraiweesh, A., Alturki, U., Almutairy, S., Shutaleva, A., & Soomro, R. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Technology Malaysia (MY)
- King Saud University (SA)
- Ural Federal University (RU)
- Corresponding author
- Dahri, Nisar Ahmed
- Yahaya, Noraffandy
- ORCID
- Venue
- Heliyon
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-04
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e29317
- ISSN
- 2405-8440 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11016976
- OpenAlex
- W4394611033
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 113
- Citations by year
- 2026: 117 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 23
- FWCI
- 89.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Heliyon (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Greater South Information System
- Funders
- King Saud University (RSP2024R159)
- Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Q.J130000.21A2.07E10)
- Research Management Centre, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
- Microsoft Research
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Education and Learning Interventions
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, technology acceptance, pre-service teachers, artificial intelligence in education, trust in AI, teacher professional development, AI integration in schools
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review