Cited by 94

Use of snus and acute myocardial infarction: pooled analysis of eight prospective observational studies

Hansson, Jenny, Galanti, Maria Rosaria, Hergens, Maria-Pia, Fredlund, Peeter, Ahlbom, Anders, Alfredsson, Lars, Bellocco, Rino, Eriksson, Marie +8 more·2012·European Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

The use of snus (also referred to as Scandinavian or Swedish moist smokeless tobacco), which is common in Sweden and increasing elsewhere, is receiving increasing attention since considered a tobacco smoke "potential reduction exposure product". Snus delivers a high dose of nicotine with possible hemodynamic effects, but its impact on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality is uncertain. The aim of this study was to investigate whether snus use is associated with risk of and survival after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Data from eight prospective cohort studies set in Sweden was pooled and reanalysed. The relative risk of first time AMI and 28-day case-fatality was calculated for 130,361 men who never smoked. During 2,262,333 person-years of follow-up, 3,390 incident events of AMI were identified. Current snus use was not associated with risk of AMI (pooled multivariable hazard ratio 1.04, 95 % confidence interval 0.93 to 1.17). The short-term case fatality rate appeared increased in snus users (odds ratio 1.28, 95 % confidence interval 0.99 to 1.68). This study does not support any association between use of snus and development of AMI. Hence, toxic components other than nicotine appear implicated in the pathophysiology of smoking related ischemic heart disease. Case fatality after AMI is seemingly increased among snus users, but this relationship may be due to confounding by socioeconomic or life style factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10654-012-9704-8

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a pooled analysis, there is no association between current snus use and increased risk of acute myocardial infarction (pHR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.93-1.17); however, among snus users there is an increase in short-term case fatality rate (OR = 1.28; 95% CI: 0.99-1.68).

    “no association between current snus use and an increased risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (pooled hazard ratio (pHR) = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.93-1.17).However, among snus users there was an increase in short-term case fatality rate (OR = 1.28; 95% CI: 0.99-1.68)(Hansson et al. 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hansson, J., Galanti, M. R., Hergens, M.-P., Fredlund, P., Ahlbom, A., Alfredsson, L., Bellocco, R., Eriksson, M., Hallqvist, J., Hedblad, B., Jansson, J.-H., Nilsson, P., Pedersen, N., Trolle Lagerros, Y., Östergren, P.-O., & Magnusson, C.
Venue
European Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2012-06-22
Volume
27
Issue
10
Pages
771-779
ISSN
  • 0393-2990
  • 1573-7284
Cited by
94
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review