The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The French CONSTANCES population-based cohort: design, inclusion and follow-up
Open accessAbstract
The CONSTANCES general-purpose cohort is intended to serve as an epidemiological research infrastructure accessible to the epidemiologic research community with a focus on occupational and social factors, and on chronic diseases and aging. CONSTANCES will also provide useful public health information to the public health authorities since it was designed as a large representative sample of the general French adult population. CONSTANCES is designed as a randomly selected representative sample of French adults aged 18-69 years at inception; 200,000 subjects will be included over a five-year period. At inclusion, the selected subjects are invited to complete questionnaires and to attend a Health Screening Center (HSC) for a comprehensive health examination. A biobank will be set up. The follow-up includes a yearly self-administered questionnaire, and a periodic visit to an HSC. Social and health data are collected from the French national databases. Data collected for participants include social and demographic characteristics, socioeconomic status, life events, behaviors, and occupational factors. The health data cover a wide spectrum: self-reported health scales, reported prevalent and incident diseases, long-term chronic diseases and hospitalizations, sick-leaves, handicaps, limitations, disabilities and injuries, healthcare utilization and services provided, and causes of death. To take into account non-participation at inclusion and attrition throughout the longitudinal follow-up, a cohort of non-participants was set up and will be followed through the same national databases as participants. Inclusion begun at the end of 2012 and more than 82,000 were already included by September 2015. A public call for nested research projects was launched.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessment of Older People: Self-Maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/9.3_part_1.179 · Cited by 18,540
Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys
Groves, R. M. (2006) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfl033 · Cited by 2,420
Riboli, E., Hunt, K., Slimani, N., Ferrari, P., Norat, T., Fahey, M., Charrondière, U., Hémon, B., Casagrande, C., Vignat, J., et al. (2002) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1079/phn2002394 · Cited by 1,866
Trajectories of disability in the last year of life
Gill, T. M., Gahbauer, E. A., Han, L., & Allore, H. G. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0909087 · Cited by 894
Stolk, R. P., Rosmalen, J. G. M., Postma, D. S., de Boer, R. A., Navis, G., Slaets, J. P. J., Ormel, J., & Wolffenbuttel, B. H. R. (2008) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-007-9204-4 · Cited by 391
Cited by
Tuppin, P., Rudant, J., Constantinou, P., Gastaldi-Ménager, C., Rachas, A., de Roquefeuil, L., Maura, G., Caillol, H., Tajahmady, A., Coste, J., et al. (2017) · Revue d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique · doi:10.1016/j.respe.2017.05.004 · Cited by 891
The Rotterdam Study: 2018 update on objectives, design and main results
Ikram, M. A., Brusselle, G. G. O., Murad, S. D., van Duijn, C. M., Franco, O. H., Goedegebure, A., Klaver, C. C. W., Nijsten, T. E. C., Peeters, R. P., Stricker, B. H., et al. (2017) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-017-0321-4 · Cited by 434
Matta, J., Wiernik, E., Robineau, O., Carrat, F., Touvier, M., Severi, G., de Lamballerie, X., Blanché, H., Deleuze, J.-F., Gouraud, C., et al. (2022) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6454 · Cited by 266
Self-citationVarga, T. V., Bu, F., Dissing, A. S., Elsenburg, L. K., Bustamante, J. J. H., Matta, J., van Zon, S. K. R., Brouwer, S., Bültmann, U., Fancourt, D., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Regional Health - Europe · doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2020.100020 · Cited by 266
Self-citationCarrat, F., Figoni, J., Henny, J., Desenclos, J.-C., Kab, S., de Lamballerie, X., & Zins, M. (2021) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-020-00716-2 · Cited by 75
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- CONSTANCES team, Zins, M., & Goldberg, M.
- Venue
- European Journal of Epidemiology
- Published
- 2015-10-31
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1317-1328
- ISSN
- 0393-2990 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7284
- OpenAlex
- W2103328221
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The French CONSTANCES population-based cohort: design, inclusion and follow-up. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10654-015-0096-4
- The paper
- CONSTANCES team, Zins, M., & Goldberg, M. (2015). The French CONSTANCES population-based cohort: design, inclusion and follow-up. European Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-015-0096-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.