Cited by 452Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchMedical Coding and Health InformationStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Identifying dementia outcomes in UK Biobank: A validation study of primary care, hospital admissions and mortality data

Open access
on behalf of Dementias Platform UK and UK Biobank, Wilkinson, Tim, Schnier, Christian, Bush, Kathryn, Rannikmäe, Kristiina, Henshall, David E., Lerpiniere, Chris, Allen, Naomi E. +6 more·2019·European Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Prospective, population-based studies that recruit participants in mid-life are valuable resources for dementia research. Follow-up in these studies is often through linkage to routinely-collected healthcare datasets. We investigated the accuracy of these datasets for dementia case ascertainment in a validation study using data from UK Biobank-an open access, population-based study of > 500,000 adults aged 40-69 years at recruitment in 2006-2010. From 17,198 UK Biobank participants recruited in Edinburgh, we identified those with ≥ 1 dementia code in their linked primary care, hospital admissions or mortality data and compared their coded diagnoses to clinical expert adjudication of their full-text medical record. We calculated the positive predictive value (PPV, the proportion of cases identified that were true positives) for all-cause dementia, Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia for each dataset alone and in combination, and explored algorithmic code combinations to improve PPV. Among 120 participants, PPVs for all-cause dementia were 86.8%, 87.3% and 80.0% for primary care, hospital admissions and mortality data respectively and 82.5% across all datasets. We identified three algorithms that balanced a high PPV with reasonable case ascertainment. For Alzheimer's disease, PPVs were 74.1% for primary care, 68.2% for hospital admissions, 50.0% for mortality data and 71.4% in combination. PPV for vascular dementia was 43.8% across all sources. UK routinely-collected healthcare data can be used to identify all-cause dementia in prospective studies. PPVs for Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia are lower. Further research is required to explore the geographic generalisability of these findings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10654-019-00499-1

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Since 2006, the UK Biobank has amassed substantial data from participants encompassing environmental factors, lifestyle choices, sociodemographic information, overall health and well-being, and cognitive and physical assessments.

    “Additionally, since 2006, the UK Biobank (UKB) [3,4,5] has amassed a substantial amount of data from participants, encompassing various fields such as environmental factors, lifestyle choices, sociodemographic information, overall health and well-being, as well as cognitive and physical assessments [6].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Biobank, O. B. O. D. P. U. A. U., Wilkinson, T., Schnier, C., Bush, K., Rannikmäe, K., Henshall, D. E., Lerpiniere, C., Allen, N. E., Flaig, R., Russ, T. C., Bathgate, D., Pal, S., O’Brien, J. T., & Sudlow, C. L. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Alzheimer Scotland (GB)
  • James Cook University Hospital (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Wilkinson, Tim
Venue
European Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2019-02-26
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
557-565
ISSN
  • 0393-2990 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7284
OpenAlex
W2917862264
Cited by
452
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 77 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7
FWCI
21.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
Funders
  • Medical Research Council (MR/P001823/1)
  • MRC Dementias Platform UK (MR/L015382/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
dementia, case ascertainment, positive predictive value, primary care records, hospitalization, mortality statistics, UK Biobank, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, routinely collected healthcare data, data linkage
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Dementia, Female, United Kingdom, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Treatment Outcome, Biological Specimen Banks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review