Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 621

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Knowledge mapping of platform research: a visual analysis using VOSviewer and CiteSpace

Ding, Xue, Yang, Zhong·2022·Electronic Commerce Research

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10660-020-09410-7

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 56 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. eMarketer. (2017). Global ecommerce platforms 2017: A country-by country review of the top retail ecommerce sites. Retrieved July 13, 2017 from https://www.emarketer.com/Report/Global-Ecommerce-Platforms-2017-Country-by-Country-Review-of-Top-Retail-Ecommerce-Sites/2002047.

Cited by

See all 621

Metadata

Authors
Ding, X., & Yang, Z.
Venue
Electronic Commerce Research
Published
2020-04-13
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
787-809
ISSN
  • 1389-5753 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9362
OpenAlex
W3017244493
Cited by
621
References
56
FWCI
50.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71732002)
  • Innovation Enhancement Plan B for Excellent PhD students of Nanjing University (201902B056)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Knowledge mapping of platform research: a visual analysis using VOSviewer and CiteSpace. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10660-020-09410-7
The paper
Ding, X., & Yang, Z. (2022). Knowledge mapping of platform research: a visual analysis using VOSviewer and CiteSpace. Electronic Commerce Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-020-09410-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.