Cited by 41Water Quality Monitoring TechnologiesAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsIchthyology and Marine Biology

Deep learning for automated analysis of fish abundance: the benefits of training across multiple habitats

Open access
Ditria, Ellen M., Sievers, Michael, Lopez-Marcano, Sebastian, Jinks, Eric L., Connolly, Rod M.·2020·Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Environmental monitoring guides conservation and is particularly important for aquatic habitats which are heavily impacted by human activities. Underwater cameras and uncrewed devices monitor aquatic wildlife, but manual processing of footage is a significant bottleneck to rapid data processing and dissemination of results. Deep learning has emerged as a solution, but its ability to accurately detect animals across habitat types and locations is largely untested for coastal environments. Here, we produce five deep learning models using an object detection framework to detect an ecologically important fish, luderick (Girella tricuspidata). We trained two models on footage from single habitats (seagrass or reef) and three on footage from both habitats. All models were subjected to tests from both habitat types. Models performed well on test data from the same habitat type (object detection measure: mAP50: 91.7 and 86.9% performance for seagrass and reef, respectively) but poorly on test sets from a different habitat type (73.3 and 58.4%, respectively). The model trained on a combination of both habitats produced the highest object detection results for both tests (an average of 92.4 and 87.8%, respectively). The ability of the combination trained models to correctly estimate the ecological abundance metric, MaxN, showed similar patterns. The findings demonstrate that deep learning models extract ecologically useful information from video footage accurately and consistently and can perform across habitat types when trained on footage from the variety of habitat types.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10661-020-08653-z

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Models trained in one acoustic environment may struggle to generalize across different habitats, recording devices, or background soundscapes.

    “Models trained in one acoustic environment may also struggle to generalize across different habitats, recording devices, or background soundscapes”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ditria, E. M., Sievers, M., Lopez-Marcano, S., Jinks, E. L., & Connolly, R. M.
Affiliations
Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Ditria, Ellen M.
Venue
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Published
2020-10-12
Volume
192
Issue
11
Pages
698-698
ISSN
  • 0167-6369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2959
OpenAlex
W3092213319
Cited by
41
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Monitoring and Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council (DP180103124)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
Keywords
fish abundance estimation, object detection, underwater video analysis, seagrass habitat, coral reef habitat, environmental monitoring
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Animals, Environment, Environmental Monitoring, Fishes, Humans, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review