The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment
Open accessAbstract
We conducted the first randomized controlled field experiment of an Internet reputation mechanism. A high-reputation, established eBay dealer sold matched pairs of lots— batches of vintage postcards—under his regular identity and under new seller identities (also operated by him). As predicted, the established identity fared better. The difference in buyers’ willingness-to-pay was 8.1% of the selling price. A subsidiary experiment followed the same format, but compared sales by relatively new sellers with and without negative feedback. Surprisingly, one or two negative feedbacks for our new sellers did not affect buyers’ willingness-to-pay.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Further, prior research suggests that it is difficult for new complementors who have just joined a new platform to collect good ratings. These new complementors often find themselves competing with more established complementors who have already built a track record (Gutt and Herrmann 2015; Resnick et al. 2006).”
From In Stars We Trust – A Note on Reputation Portability Between Digital Platforms (2022) · cites this paper as Resnick et al. 2006
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“They estimate an 8% price premium to having 2,000 positive and 1 negative feedback over a reputation of 10 positive and no negative feedbacks.”
From Reputation and Feedback Systems in Online Platform Markets (2016) · cites this paper as Resnick et al. (2006)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This is highlighted by the puzzlement of economists that find evaluative infrastructures to be capable of sustaining markets despite being plagued by factual inaccuracies, misleading claims, and unrepresentative assessments (Tadelis, 2016;Resnick, et al., 2006).”
From Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization (2017) · cites this paper as Resnick, et al., 2006
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism
Akerlof, G. A. (1970) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1879431 · Cited by 23,016
Premiums for High Quality Products as Returns to Reputations
Shapiro, C. (1983) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1881782 · Cited by 2,327
Harrison, G. W., & List, J. A. (2004) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/0022051043004577 · Cited by 2,282
Ba, S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2002) · Cited by 2,256
Trust among strangers in internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay' s reputation system
Resnick, P., & Zeckhauser, R. (2004) · Advances in applied microeconomics · doi:10.1016/s0278-0984(02)11030-3 · Cited by 1,831
Self-citationReputation Acquisition in Debt Markets
Diamond, D. W. (1989) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261630 · Cited by 1,627
The Winner's Curse, Reserve Prices, and Endogenous Entry: Empirical Insights from eBay Auctions
Bajari, P., Hortaçsu, A., & Hortacsu, A. (2003) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1593721 · Cited by 1,041
Reputation in Auctions: Theory, and Evidence from e Bay
Houser, D. E., & Wooders, J. (2006) · Journal of Economics & Management Strategy · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9134.2006.00103.x · Cited by 698
How Effective Are Electronic Reputation Mechanisms? An Experimental Investigation
Bolton, G. E., Katok, E., & Ockenfels, A. (2004) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1030.0199 · Cited by 667
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,000
A predictive framework for retrieving the best answer
Blooma, M. J., Chua, A. Y. K., & Goh, D. H. (2008) · ACM Symposium on Applied Computing · doi:10.1145/1363686.1363944 · Cited by 85
Sniping and Squatting in Auction Markets
Ely, J. C., & Hossain, T. (2009) · American Economic Journal Microeconomics · doi:10.1257/mic.1.2.68 · Cited by 85
The Dimensions of Reputation in Electronic MarketsPreprint
Ghose, A., Ipeirotis, P. G., & Sundararajan, A. (2006) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.885568 · Cited by 87
The role of writing and recordkeeping in the cultural evolution of human cooperation
Mullins, D., Whitehouse, H., & Atkinson, Q. D. (2012) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.017 · Cited by 84
An agency perspective on service triads: Linking operational and financial performance
Zhang, J. J., Lawrence, B., & Anderson, C. K. (2014) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2014.10.005 · Cited by 84
Avoiding ballot stuffing in eBay-like reputation systems
Bhattacharjee, R. K., & Goel, A. (2005) · doi:10.1145/1080192.1080203 · Cited by 84
The design of a reliable reputation system
Swamynathan, G., Almeroth, K. C., & Zhao, B. Y. (2010) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-010-9064-y · Cited by 84
RLM: A General Model for Trust Representation and Aggregation
Wang, X., Liu, L., & Su, J. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Services Computing · doi:10.1109/tsc.2010.56 · Cited by 83
eBay in the Economic Literature: Analysis of an Auction Marketplace
Hasker, K., & Sickles, R. C. (2010) · Review of Industrial Organization · doi:10.1007/s11151-010-9257-5 · Cited by 83
Recordkeeping alters economic history by promoting reciprocity
Basu, S., Dickhaut, J. W., Hecht, G., Towry, K. L., & Waymire, G. B. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0811967106 · Cited by 83
Platforms: a multiplicity of research opportunities
Sriram, S., Manchanda, P., Esteban-Bravo, M., Chu, J., Ma, L., Song, M., Shriver, S. K., & Subramanian, U. (2014) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11002-014-9314-1 · Cited by 83
Pfeiffer, T., Tran, L. H., Krumme, C., & Rand, D. G. (2012) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2012.0332 · Cited by 89
Chapter 13 Reputation Mechanisms
Dellarocas, C. N. (2006) · Handbooks in information systems · doi:10.1016/s1574-0145(06)01013-0 · Cited by 82
Kuwabara, K. (2015) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/681231 · Cited by 85
Online reviews: A literature review and roadmap for future research
Pocchiari, M., Proserpio, D., & Dover, Y. (2024) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.08.009 · Cited by 97
Online reputation systems: Design and strategic practices
Zhou, M., Dresner, M., & Windle, R. J. (2007) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2007.10.001 · Cited by 78
The PageTrust algorithm: How to rank web pages when negative links are allowed?
de Kerchove, C., & Dooren, P. M. V. (2008) · SIAM International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1137/1.9781611972788.31 · Cited by 78
Buyer Uncertainty About Seller Capacity: Causes, Consequences, and a Partial Solution
Horton, J. J. (2019) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2018.3116 · Cited by 77
Etzioni, A. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3627-y · Cited by 76
Sellers' problems in human computation markets
Silberman, M. ‘., Ross, J., Irani, L. C., & Tomlinson, B. (2010) · doi:10.1145/1837885.1837891 · Cited by 74
Moeller, K. K., Munksgaard, R., & Demant, J. (2017) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764217734269 · Cited by 73
Yang, Y., Sun, Y. L., Kay, S., & Yang, Q. (2009) · ACM Symposium on Applied Computing · doi:10.1145/1529282.1529575 · Cited by 72
Evolutionary cyber-psychology: Applying an evolutionary framework to Internet behavior
Piazza, J. R., & Bering, J. M. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.07.002 · Cited by 74
Does Competition Promote Trust and Trustworthiness in Online Trading? An Experimental Study
Bolton, G. E., Loebbecke, C., & Ockenfels, A. (2008) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222250207 · Cited by 71
The role of online trading communities in managing internet auction fraud
Chua, C. E. H., Wareham, J. D., & Robey, D. (2007) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.5555/2017356.2017363 · Cited by 71
Reputation and adverse selection: theory and evidence from eBay
Saeedi, M. (2019) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.1111/1756-2171.12297 · Cited by 71
In praise of forgiveness: Ways for repairing trust breakdowns in one-off online interactions
Vasalou, A., Hopfensitz, A., & Pitt, J. V. (2008) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.02.001 · Cited by 70
Scan and click: The uses and gratifications of social recommendation systems
Kim, J. W. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.028 · Cited by 67
Coordination problems in cryptomarkets: Changes in cooperation, competition and valuation
Bakken, S. A., Moeller, K. K., & Sandberg, S. (2017) · European Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1177/1477370817749177 · Cited by 67
I paid a bribe : An experiment on information sharing and extortionary corruption
Ryvkin, D., Serra, D., & Tremewan, J. (2017) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.02.003 · Cited by 66
CommTrust: Computing Multi-Dimensional Trust by Mining E-Commerce Feedback Comments
Zhang, X., Cui, L., & Wang, Y. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2013.177 · Cited by 69
Money Talks: Rebate Mechanisms in Reputation System Design
Li, L. (., & Xiao, E. (2014) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2013.1848 · Cited by 65
Farajallah, M., Hammond, R. G., & Pénard, T. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.1016/j.infoecopol.2019.01.002 · Cited by 65
Self-selection, slipping, salvaging, slacking, and stoning
Khopkar, T., Li, X., & Resnick, P. (2005) · ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC) · doi:10.1145/1064009.1064033 · Cited by 64
Self-citationAn Empirical Investigation of Third-Party Seller Rating Systems in E-Commerce: The Case of buySAFE
Clemons, E. K. (2007) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222240203 · Cited by 64
Ye, Q., Min, X., Kiang, M. Y., Wu, W., & Sun, F. (2013) · Journal of electronic commerce research · Cited by 64
The Sealed-Bid Abstraction in Online Auctions
Zeithammer, R., & Adams, C. (2010) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1100.0561 · Cited by 64
Advertising Strategy in the Presence of Reviews: An Empirical Analysis
Hollenbeck, B., Moorthy, S., & Proserpio, D. (2017) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2019.1180 · Cited by 63
Strategic Behavior in Online Reputation Systems: Evidence from Revoking on Ebay1
Ye, S., Gao, G. G., & Viswanathan, S. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.4.05 · Cited by 63
Indebtedness and reciprocity in local online exchange
Lampinen, A., Lehtinen, V., Cheshire, C., & Suhonen, E. (2013) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2441776.2441850 · Cited by 64
Buyers pay for and sellers invest in a good reputation: More evidence from eBay
Przepiorka, W. (2012) · The Journal of Socio-Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2012.11.004 · Cited by 62
Reputation, Trust, and Rebates: How Online Auction Markets Can Improve Their Feedback Mechanisms
Li, L. (2010) · Journal of Economics & Management Strategy · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9134.2010.00253.x · Cited by 62
Regulating Behavior in Online Communities
Ren, Y., Kraut, R., Kiesler, S. B., & Resnick, P. (2018) · KiltHub Repository · doi:10.1184/r1/6470384 · Cited by 62
Self-citationEncouraging Commitment in Online Communities
Ren, Y., Kraut, R. E., Kiesler, S. B., & Resnick, P. (2012) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/8472.003.0004 · Cited by 61
Self-citationFilippas, A., Horton, J. J., & Golden, J. M. (2022) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2022.1350 · Cited by 61
FUZZY TRUST AGGREGATION AND PERSONALIZED TRUST INFERENCE IN VIRTUAL SOCIAL NETWORKS
Lesani, M., & Montazeri, N. (2009) · Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8640.2009.00334.x · Cited by 61
The Limits of Trust in Economic Transactions - Investigations of Perfect Reputation SystemsPreprint
Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1092394 · Cited by 61
A support system for predicting eBay end prices
van Heijst, D., Potharst, R., & van Wezel, M. (2007) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2007.11.004 · Cited by 59
Nunley, J. M., Owens, M. F., & Howard, R. S. (2011) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.028 · Cited by 59
Social image concerns promote cooperation more than altruistic punishment
Grimalda, G. F., Pondorfer, A., & Tracer, D. P. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12288 · Cited by 66
Secondhand seller reputation in online markets: A text analytics framework
Chen, R., Zheng, Y., Xu, W. X., Liu, M., & Wang, J. (2018) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2018.02.008 · Cited by 60
Being watched: Effects of an audience on eye gaze and prosocial behaviour
Cañigueral, R., & Hamilton, A. F. D. C. (2019) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.02.002 · Cited by 59
Barnes, S. J., & Kirshner, S. N. (2020) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104235 · Cited by 58
3. Rational Choice Research on Social Dilemmas: Embeddedness Effects on Trust
Buskens, V., & Raub, W. (2020) · Stanford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780804785501-006 · Cited by 58
Internet Exchanges for Used Goods: An Empirical Analysis of Trade Patterns and Adverse SelectionPreprint
Ghose, A. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1214725 · Cited by 57
The complexity of human cooperation under indirect reciprocity
Santos, F. P., Pacheco, J. M., & Santos, F. C. (2021) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2020.0291 · Cited by 61
Wu, J., & Gaytán, E. A. A. (2012) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.33 · Cited by 58
Reputation Effects in Public and Private Interactions
Ohtsuki, H., Iwasa, Y., & Nowak, M. A. (2015) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004527 · Cited by 59
Robustness of Trust and Reputation Systems: Does It Matter?
Jøsang, A. (2012) · IFIP International Federation for Information Processing/IFIP · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29852-3_21 · Cited by 56
Silva, R. R., Chrobot, N., Newman, E. J., Schwarz, N., & Topolinski, S. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02200 · Cited by 56
Behavioral economic engineering
Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2011) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2011.09.003 · Cited by 55
Effects of a reputation feedback system on an online consumer-to-consumer auction market
Yang, J., Hu, X., & Zhang, H. (2007) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2007.03.005 · Cited by 55
Seller rating, price, and default in online auctions
Bruce, N. I., Haruvy, E. E., & Rao, R. C. (2004) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.20021 · Cited by 55
Sung, K. H., & Lee, M. J. (2015) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00223980.2013.879847 · Cited by 54
Stylometric Identification in Electronic Markets: Scalability and Robustness
Abbasi, A., Chen, H., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2008) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222250103 · Cited by 53
Moser, C., Resnick, P., & Schoenebeck, S. Y. (2017) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025550 · Cited by 53
Self-citationOsman, H., D’Acunto, D., & Johns, N. (2019) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21264 · Cited by 53
Ramakrishnan, R., & Tomkins, A. (2007) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2007.294 · Cited by 53
Sayfuddin, A., & Yong, C. (2021) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.103065 · Cited by 52
Inferring preference correlations from social networks
Hogg, T. (2009) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2009.04.006 · Cited by 52
Dai, Y. H., Viken, G., Joo, E., & Bente, G. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.038 · Cited by 52
Bapna, R. (2003) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/953460.953495 · Cited by 52
Information Dispersion and Auction PricesPreprint
Yin, P.-L. (2006) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.690201 · Cited by 52
Systematic analysis of centralized online reputation systems
Liu, L., & Munro, M. (2011) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2011.10.003 · Cited by 51
Reputation-based trust management systems and their applicability to grids
Silaghi, G. C., Arenas, A. E., & Silva, L. M. (2007) · Cited by 51
Does Information Help or Hinder Job Applicants from Less Developed Countries in Online Markets?
Agrawal, A., Lacetera, N., & Lyons, E. (2013) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w18720 · Cited by 51
Feedback Mechanisms, Judgment Bias, and Trust Formation in Online Auctions*
Wolf, J. R., & Muhanna, W. A. (2011) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00301.x · Cited by 50
Why Bother with What Others Tell You? An Experimental Data-Driven Agent-Based Model
Boero, R., Bravo, G., Castellani, M., & Squazzoni, F. (2010) · Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation · doi:10.18564/jasss.1620 · Cited by 52
Manipulability of PageRank under Sybil Strategies
Cheng, A., & Friedman, E. (2006) · Cited by 50
Can Warranties Substitute for Reputations?
Roberts, J. W. (2011) · American Economic Journal Microeconomics · doi:10.1257/mic.3.3.69 · Cited by 50
Heide, B. L. V. D., Johnson, B. K., & Vang, M. H. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.002 · Cited by 49
Anomaly Detection in Feedback-based Reputation Systems through Temporal and Correlation Analysis
Liu, Y., & Sun, Y. L. (2010) · doi:10.1109/socialcom.2010.19 · Cited by 49
Establishing Trust and Trustworthiness for Supply Chain Information Sharing
Özer, Ö., & Zheng, Y. (2016) · Springer series in supply chain management · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32441-8_14 · Cited by 49
FACID: A trust-based collaborative decision framework for intrusion detection networks
Fung, C., & Zhu, Q. (2016) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2016.08.014 · Cited by 49
Network Trust and Trust Behaviors Among Executives in Supply Chain Interactions
Choi, E. W., Özer, Ö., & Zheng, Y. (2020) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2019.3499 · Cited by 49
Bowling Alone but Online Together: Social Capital in E-Communities
Scott, J. K., & Johnson, T. G. (2005) · Community Development · doi:10.1080/15575330509489868 · Cited by 48
How Effective are Electronic Reputation MechanismsPreprint
Bolton, G. E. (2003) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 47
(2015) · Cited by 46
Wang, H., Du, R., Shen, W., Qiu, L., & Fan, W. (2022) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2022/15660 · Cited by 46
Li, S., Feng, B., Chen, M., & Bell, R. A. (2015) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2014.977467 · Cited by 49
Indirect Reciprocity under Incomplete Observation
Nakamura, M., & Masuda, N. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002113 · Cited by 46
Price determinants for remanufactured electronic products: a case study on eBay UK
Pang, G., Casalin, F., Papagiannidis, S., Muyldermans, L., & Tse, Y. K. (2014) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.958594 · Cited by 46
A Blockchain-based Value Added Tax (VAT) System: Saudi Arabia as a Use-Case
Alkhodre, A. B., Syed, T. A., Jan, S., Alsaawy, Y., Khusro, S., & Yasar, M. (2019) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2019.0100588 · Cited by 49
Coevolution of Trustful Buyers and Cooperative Sellers in the Trust Game
Masuda, N., & Nakamura, M. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044169 · Cited by 45
Social Presence: Influence on Bidders in Internet Auctions
Rafaeli, S., & Noy, A. (2005) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1080/10196780500083886 · Cited by 44
Cabral, L. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195397840.013.0013 · Cited by 44
No good deed goes unpunished: the social costs of prosocial behaviour
Raihani, N., & Power, E. A. (2021) · Evolutionary Human Sciences · doi:10.1017/ehs.2021.35 · Cited by 47
The Effect of Price on Firm Reputation
Luca, M., & Reshef, O. (2021) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2021.4049 · Cited by 44
THE EFFECT OF SERVICE QUALITY AND EXPECTATIONS ON CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS*
Forbes, S. J. (2008) · Journal of Industrial Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6451.2008.00338.x · Cited by 44
Do reputation feedback systems really improve trust among anonymous traders? An experimental study
David Masclet, B., & Pénard, T. (2011) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036846.2011.591740 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Swanson, J., & Lockwood, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Venue
- Experimental Economics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 79-101
- ISSN
- 1386-4157 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6938
- OpenAlex
- W3121755630
- Cited by
- 1,118
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 91
- FWCI
- 109.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Experimental Economics (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Carnegie Mellon University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Auction Theory and Applications
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Keywords
- online reputation, eBay, online auctions, willingness to pay, negative feedback, buyer behavior, online marketplaces
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
