Cited by 65Experimental Behavioral Economics StudiesAuction Theory and ApplicationsGame Theory and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Money Talks: Rebate Mechanisms in Reputation System Design

Li, Lingfang (Ivy), Xiao, Erte·2014·Management Science

Abstract

Reputation systems that rely on voluntary feedback from traders are important in creating and sustaining trust in markets. Feedback nevertheless is a public good, and providing it is often costly. We combine theory with a laboratory experiment to study the effect of a seller precommitment mechanism: Sellers have an option to commit by providing a rebate to reduce the buyer's feedback reporting cost before making purchasing decisions. Our theory predicts that this mechanism induces noncooperative sellers to cooperate in the listed-price market. Using a buyer–seller trust game with a unilateral feedback scheme, we find that the seller's rebate decision has a significant impact on the buyer's purchasing decision via signaling the seller's cooperative type. More importantly, market efficiency under the precommitment mechanism increases with the probability that sellers will provide a rebate. Compared with the no rebate mechanism market, more efficient trades can be achieved when the sellers offer a rebate to the buyers in the market with the rebate mechanism, even when the rebate does not cover the full cost of feedback reporting. Data, as supplemental material, are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1848 . This paper was accepted by Teck-Hua Ho, behavioral economics.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/mnsc.2013.1848

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.1016/j.econlet.2010.01.033 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.jebo.2009.07.010 · DOI
  3. 10.1257/000282803322157142 · DOI
  4. 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1145 · DOI
  5. 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1370 · DOI
  6. 10.1257/aer.99.1.544 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1257/aer.89.3.564 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0167-9236(02)00074-X · DOI
  9. 10.1257/0022051041409075 · DOI
  10. 10.1257/aer.96.5.1652 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1006/obhd.1995.1068 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Bolton GE, 2009, eTrust, 15
  13. 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1609 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0199 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00042-2 · DOI
  16. 10.2307/41166371 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2010.00405.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. Cai H, Jin G, Liu C, Zhou L (2013) More trusting, less trust? An investigation of early e-commerce in China. NBER Working Paper 18961, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. · DOI
  19. 10.1257/aer.100.4.1358 · DOI
  20. 10.1287/mnsc.49.10.1407.17308 · DOI
  21. 10.1145/779928.779930 · DOI
  22. 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0747 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.0022-1821.2004.00237.x · DOI
  24. 10.1257/jep.14.3.159 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Fehr E, 2009, Econom. J., 119, 333
  26. 10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4 · DOI
  27. 10.1162/105864001300122476 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/s10683-010-9267-z · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2006.00103.x · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.econlet.2010.07.008 · DOI
  31. 10.1145/1562764.1562800 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00067.x · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1145/1250910.1250940 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02223.x · DOI
  35. Lafky JM, 2011, Three Essays on Online Ratings and Auction Theory
  36. 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2010.00253.x · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.econlet.2010.05.013 · DOI
  38. 10.1080/00036846.2011.591740 · DOI
  39. 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0379 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.04.008 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00176-3 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/S0278-0984(02)11030-3 · DOI
  43. 10.2307/1881782 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_481 · DOI
  45. 10.1073/pnas.0502399102 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 65

Metadata

Authors
Li, L. (., & Xiao, E.
Affiliations
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
Management Science
Published
2014-08
Volume
60
Issue
8
Pages
2054-2072
ISSN
  • 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5501
OpenAlex
W3123751120
Cited by
65
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
7.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Management Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Auction Theory and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
Keywords
reputation systems, market trust, cooperation, signaling, market efficiency, public goods, online marketplaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review