Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

University Students’ Perceptions of and Attitudes Toward (Online) Peer Assessment

Wen, Meichun Lydia, Tsai, Chin-Chung·2006·Higher Education
DOI 10.1007/s10734-004-6375-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10734-004-6375-8

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. L. Arnold, 1981, Journal of Medical Education, 56, 35, 10.1097/00001888-198101000-00007 · DOI
  2. D. Boud, 1990, Studies in Higher Education, 15, 110, 10.1080/03075079012331377621 · DOI · Paper page
  3. C. Brindley, 1998, Teaching in Higher Education, 3, 79, 10.1080/1356215980030106 · DOI
  4. S.A. Butler, 2001, Physical Educator, 58, 30
  5. W. Cheng, 1997, Studies in Higher Education, 22, 233, 10.1080/03075079712331381064 · DOI
  6. S. Clegg, 2000, Higher Education, 40, 123, 10.1023/A:1004093116051 · doi:10.1023/a:1004093116051
  7. V.A. Clifford, 1999, Higher Education Research & Development, 18, 115, 10.1080/0729436990180109 · DOI
  8. P. Davies, 2000, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 37, 346
  9. N. Falchikov, 1995, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 32, 175
  10. N. Falchikov, 2001, Learning Together: Peer Tutoring in Higher Education, 10.4324/9780203451496 · DOI
  11. N. Falchikov, 1997, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 22, 385, 10.1080/0260293970220403 · DOI
  12. Fitzpatrick, C. (1999). ‘Students as evaluators in practicum: Examining peer/self assessment and self-efficacy’, Presented at the National Conference of the Association for Counselor Education and Supervision, New Orleans
  13. L. Hatcher, 1994, A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Univariate and Multivariate Statistics
  14. S.J. Hanrahan, 2001, Higher Education Research & Development, 20, 53, 10.1080/07294360123776 · DOI · Paper page
  15. C.B. Johnson, 1997, Accounting Education (JAI), 2, 21
  16. M. Lejk, 2001, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26, 551, 10.1080/02602930120093887 · DOI
  17. L.J. LeMare, 1987, Child Development, 58, 306, 10.2307/1130508 · doi:10.2307/1130508
  18. S.S.J. Lin, 2001, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 420, 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00198.x · DOI · Paper page
  19. D. McConnell, 2002, Studies in Continuing Education, 24, 73, 10.1080/01580370220130459 · DOI
  20. J. McGourty, 2000, IEEE Transactions on Education, 43, 120, 10.1109/13.848062 · DOI
  21. P. Orsmond, 1996, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21, 239, 10.1080/0260293960210304 · DOI · Paper page
  22. M.R. Paquet, 1998, Education for Health, 11, 25
  23. L. Rubin, 2002, Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 29, 382, 10.58680/tetyc20022022 · DOI
  24. K. Sambell, 1998, Improving Student Learning – Improving Students as Learners, 56
  25. D. Sluijsmans, 1999, Learning Environment Research, 1, 293, 10.1023/A:1009932704458 · doi:10.1023/a:1009932704458
  26. H. Smith, 2002, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39, 71, 10.1080/13558000110102904 · DOI
  27. T.H. Spotts, 1997, Higher Education, 34, 421, 10.1023/A:1003035425837 · DOI
  28. L. Stanier, 1997, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 21, 95, 10.1080/03098269708725413 · DOI
  29. M.E Sullivan, 1999, The American Journal of Surgery, 177, 266, 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00006-9 · DOI
  30. K. Topping, 1998, Review of Educational Research, 68, 249, 10.3102/00346543068003249 · doi:10.3102/00346543068003249 · Paper page
  31. C.-C. Tsai, 2001a, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38, 220, 10.1080/14703290110051415 · DOI
  32. C.-C. Tsai, 2001b, Computers & Education, 37, 41, 10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00033-1 · DOI · Paper page
  33. E. Williams, 1992, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 17, 45, 10.1080/0260293920170105 · DOI
  34. R. Zevenbergen, 2001, Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4, 95, 10.1023/A:1011401532410 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wen, M. L., & Tsai, C.-C.
Venue
Higher Education
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2006-01
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
27-44
ISSN
  • 0018-1560 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-174X
DOI
10.1007/s10734-004-6375-8
OpenAlex
W1967382752
Cited by
273
References
4
FWCI
24.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.