Cited by 31Personal Information Management and User BehaviorHuman-Automation Interaction and SafetyCognitive Abilities and Testing

Task Speed and Accuracy Decrease When Multitasking

Lin, Lin, Cockerham, Deborah, Chang, Zhengsi, Natividad, Gloria·2016·Technology, Knowledge and Learning

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10758-015-9266-4

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, L., Cockerham, D., Chang, Z., & Natividad, G.
Affiliations
  • University of North Texas (US)
  • The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
Corresponding author
Lin, Lin
Venue
Technology, Knowledge and Learning
Published
2015-11-14
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
307-323
ISSN
  • 2211-1662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2211-1670
OpenAlex
W2206648719
Cited by
31
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Technology Knowledge and Learning (publishedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
multitasking, task accuracy, task completion time, age differences, cognitive efficiency, adolescents, young adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review