CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 34

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toward an Archaeology of the Future

Wurst, LouAnn, Mrozowski, Stephen A.·2014·International Journal of Historical Archaeology
DOI 10.1007/s10761-014-0253-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10761-014-0253-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disciplinary efforts to address persistent injustice have taken a variety of forms, including community archaeology, activist archaeology, sustainable archaeology, critical theory, intellectual property rights, and sovereignty-driven research.

    “Disciplinary efforts to address persistent injustice have taken a variety of forms (Wurst and Mrozowski 2014:214), including community archaeology (e.g., Atalay 2012;Colwell-Chanthaphonh and Ferguson 2007;Dongoske et al. 2000;Silliman 2008;Swidler et al. 1997;Watkins 2000), activist archaeology (e.g., Atalay et al. 2016;Colwell-Chanthaphonh 2007), sustainable archaeology (e.g., Ferris and Welch”

    From Archaeology and Social Justice in Native America (2022) · cites this paper as Wurst and Mrozowski 2014:214

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Baert, P. (2005). Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Toward Pragmatism, Polity Press, Cambridge.
  2. Beitl, C. M. (2012). Shifting policies, access, and tragedy of enclosures in Ecuadorian mangrove fisheries: towards a political ecology of the commons. Journal of Political Ecology 19: 94–113. · DOI
  3. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: The Political Ecology of Things, Duke University Press, Durham. · DOI
  4. Collins, T. W. (2008). The political ecology of hazard vulnerability: marginalization, facilitation and the production of differential risk to urban wildfires in Arizona’s White Mountains. Journal of Political Ecology 15: 21–43.
  5. Conkey, M. W. (1991). Original narratives: the politcal economy of gender in archaeology. In di Leonadro, M. (ed.), Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge: Feminist Anthropology in the Postmodern Era, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 102–139. · DOI
  6. Crumley, C. L., and Marquardt, W. H. (1987). Regional dynamics in Burgundy. In Crumley, C. L., and Marquardt, W. H. (eds.), Regional dynamics: Burgundian landscapes in historical perspective, Academic, San Diego, pp. 609–623.
  7. Dawdy, S. L. (2009). Millennial archaeology: locating the discipline in the age of insecurity. Archaeological Dialogues 16: 131–142. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Eagleton, T. (2003). After Theory, Basic Books, New York.
  9. Eagleton, T. (2008). Comrades and colons. In Mitchell, K. (ed.), Practicing Public Scholarship: Experiences and Possibilities Beyond the Academy, Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, pp. 6–10. · DOI
  10. Eagleton, T. (2011). Why Marx was Right, Yale University Press, New Haven.
  11. Ebert, T. L., and Zavarzadeh, M. (2008). Class in Culture, Boulder, CO., Paradigm.
  12. Escobar, A. (1999). After nature: steps to an anti-essentialist political ecology. Current Anthropology 40: 1–30. · DOI
  13. Friedman, E., and Lee, C. K. (2010). Remaking the world of Chinese labour: a 30-year retrospective. British Journal of Industrial Relations 48: 507–533. · DOI
  14. Greenberg, J. B. (2006). The political ecology of fisheries in the Upper Gulf of California. In Biersack, A., and Greenberg, J. B. (eds.), Reimagining Political Ecology, Duke University Press, Durham, pp. 121–148. · DOI
  15. Harman, C. (2009). Zombie Capitalism, Haymarket Books, Chicago.
  16. Johnson, M. (1996). An Archaeology of Capitalism, Blackwell, Oxford.
  17. LaRoche, C. J., and Blakey, M. L. (1997). Seizing intellectual power: the dialogue of the New York African Burial Ground. Historical Archaeology 31: 84–106. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Leone, M. P. (1999). Setting some terms for historical archaeologies of capitalism. In Leone, M. P., and Potter Jr., P. B. (eds.), Historical Archaeologies of Capitalism, Kluwer, New York, pp. 3–22. · DOI
  19. Leone, M. P., and Potter Jr., P. B. (eds.) (1999). Historical Archaeologies of Capitalism, Kluwer, New York.
  20. Little, B. J. (2007). Historical Archaeology: Why the Past Matters, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek.
  21. Little, B. J. (2010). Epilogue: changing the world with archaeology. In Stottman, M. J. (ed.), Archaeologists as Activists: Can Archaeology Change the World, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, pp. 154–158.
  22. Little, B. J., and Shackel, P. A. (eds.) (2007). Archaeology as a Tool of Civic Engagement, AltaMira, Lanham.
  23. Marquardt, W. H. (1992). Dialectical archaeology. In Shiffer, M. B. (ed.), Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 4, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 101–140.
  24. Marx, K. (1963). The 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte, International Publishers, New York.
  25. Marx, K. (1967). Capital, vol. I, International Publishers, New York.
  26. Marx, K. (1971). Theories of Surplus Value, vol. 3, Progress Publishers, Moscow.
  27. Mark, K. (1991). Capital: Volume III, Penguin, London.
  28. Marx, K., and Engels, F. (1970). The German Ideology, International Publishers, New York.
  29. Matthews, C. N. (2010). The Archaeology of American Capitalism, University Press of Florida, Gainesville.
  30. McChesney, R. W., and Foster, J. B. (2010). Capitalism, the absurd system. Monthly. Review 62(2): 1–16.
  31. McDavid, C. (2002). Archaeologies that hurt: descendants that matter: a pragmatic approach to collaboration in the public interpretation of African-American archaeology. World Archaeology 34: 303–314. · DOI · Paper page
  32. McDavid, C. (2010). Public archaeology, activism, and racism: rethinking the heritage “product. In Stottman, M. J. (ed.), Archaeologists as Activists: Can Archaeology Change the World? University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, pp. 36–47.
  33. McGuire, R. H. (2008). Archaeology as Political Action, University of California Press, Berkeley. · DOI · Paper page
  34. McNally, D. (2011). Global Slump, PM Press, Oakland.
  35. Mrozowski, S. A. (2006). The Archaeology of Class in Urban America, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  36. Mrozowski, S. A. (2012). Ethnobiology for a diverse world: spaces and natures: archaeology and the political ecology of modern cities. Journal of Ethnobiology 32: 129–133. · DOI
  37. Mrozowski, S. A., Herbster, H., Brown, D., and Priddy, K. L. (2009). Magunkaquog materiality, Federal recognition, and the search for deeper history. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 13: 430–463. · DOI
  38. O’Donovan, M. (2002). Grasping power: a question of relations and scales. In O’Donoan, M. (ed.), The Dynamics of Power, Center for Archaeological Investigations and Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 19–34.
  39. Ollman, B. (1993). Dialectical Investigations, Routledge, New York.
  40. Ollman, B. (2003). Dance of the Dialectic: Steps in Marx’s Method, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
  41. Ollman, B., and Smith, T. (2008). Introduction. In Smith, T. (ed.), Ollman, B, Dialectics for a New Century. Palgrave, New York, pp. 1–7.
  42. Orser, C. E. (1996). A Historical Archaeology of the Modern World, Plenum Press, New York. · DOI · Paper page
  43. Paynter, R. (1988). Steps to an archaeology of capitalism. In Leone, M. P., and Potter Jr., P. B. (eds.), The Recovery of Meaning: Historical Archaeology inthe Eastern United States, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp. 407–433.
  44. Pearce, M. (2011). Have rumours of the “death of theory” been exaggerated. In Bintliff, J., and Pearce, M. (eds.), The Death of Archaeological Theory, Oxbow Books, Oxford, pp. 80–89. · DOI
  45. Preucel, R. W., and Bauer, A. A. (2001). Archaeological pragmatics. Norwegian Archaeological Review 34: 85–96. · DOI
  46. Rorty, R. (1998). Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth-Century America, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
  47. Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and Social Hope, Penguin, London.
  48. Sabloff, J. A. (2008). Archaeology Matters: Action Archaeology in the Modern World, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek.
  49. Saitta, D. J. (2007). The Archaeology of Collective Action, University Press of Florida, Gainsville.
  50. Shackel, P. A. (2011). New Philadelphia: An Archaeology of Race in the Heartland, University of Calfornia Press, Berkeley.
  51. Silliman, S. A. (ed.) (2008). Collaborative Archaeology at the Trowels Edge: Learning and Teaching in Indigenous Archaeology, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
  52. Silliman, S. A. (2009). Change and continuity, practice and memory: native American persistence in colonial New England. American Antiquity 74: 211–230. · DOI
  53. Silliman, S. W., and Ferguson, T. J. (2010). Consultation and collaboration with descendent communities. In Ashmore, W., Lippert, D. T., and Mills, B. J. (eds.), Voices in American Archaeology, SAA Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 48–72.
  54. Stocking, G. W. (1968). On the limits of “presentism” and “historicism” in the historiography of the behavioral sciences. In Stocking, G. W. (ed.), Race, Culture, and Evolution: Essays in the History of Anthropology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 1–12.
  55. Stottman, M. J. (ed.) (2010). Archaeologists as Activists: Can Archaeology Change the World, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.
  56. Uggla, Y. (2010). What is this thing called “natural”? the nature-culture divide in climate change and biodiversity policy. Journal of Political Ecology 17: 79–91. · DOI
  57. Wood, M. C. (2002). Women’s work and class conflict in a working-class coal-mining community. In O’Donovan, M. (ed.), The Dynamics of Power, Center for Archaeological Investigations and Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 66–87.
  58. Wylie, A. (1999). Why should historical archaeologists study capitalism? the logic of question and answer and the challenge of system analysis. In Leone, M. P., and Potter Jr., P. B. (eds.), Historical Archaeologies of Capitalism, Kluwer, New York, pp. 23–50. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wurst, L., & Mrozowski, S. A.
Venue
International Journal of Historical Archaeology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2014-03-27
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
210-223
ISSN
  • 1092-7697
  • 1573-7748
DOI
10.1007/s10761-014-0253-6
Cited by
34
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review