Cited by 496Problem and Project Based LearningSTEM EducationMathematics Education and Pedagogy

HOW SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) PROJECT-BASED LEARNING (PBL) AFFECTS HIGH, MIDDLE, AND LOW ACHIEVERS DIFFERENTLY: THE IMPACT OF STUDENT FACTORS ON ACHIEVEMENT

Han, Sunyoung, Capraro, Robert, Capraro, Mary Margaret·2015·International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10763-014-9526-0

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The convergent parallel mixed methods design is best suited for this study, to compare the results of the quantitative and qualitative data that were collected simultaneously.

    “the convergent parallel mixed methods design is best suited for this study, to compare the results of the quantitative and qualitative data that were collected simultaneously.”
  • The data collection and analysis applied the convergent parallel model for mixed methods analysis using qualitative and quantitative tools, with equal weight attributed to the qualitative and the quantitative data collected.

    “The data collection and analysis applied the convergent parallel model for mixed methods analysis using qualitative and quantitative tools, with equal weight attributed to the qualitative and the quantitative data collected [48], [50], [51].”
  • The influence of STEM exposure is stronger on women than on men.

    “The influence of STEM exposure is stronger on women than on men, although fewer women participate in the program than men, as presented in other studies [3], [43], [48].”
  • Fewer women participate in the program than men.

    “The influence of STEM exposure is stronger on women than on men, although fewer women participate in the program than men, as presented in other studies [3], [43], [48].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Han, S., Capraro, R., & Capraro, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Texas Tech University (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Han, Sunyoung
Venue
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
Published
2014-03-14
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
1089-1113
ISSN
  • 1571-0068 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1774
OpenAlex
W2094322391
Cited by
496
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
41.69
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › STEM Education
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
STEM project-based learning, mathematics achievement, high school students, achievement gap, underachieving students, student demographics, ethnicity, economic status, teacher professional development, Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review