Cited by 64Primate Behavior and EcologyWildlife Ecology and ConservationPlant and animal studies

Ecological Partitioning of Cercopithecus campbelli, C. petaurista, and C. diana in the Taï Forest

Buzzard, Paul J.·2006·International Journal of Primatology

Abstract

I determined the degree of ecological partitioning among 3 species of guenons (Cercopithecus campbelli, C. petaurista, and C. diana) in the Taï Forest, Côte d’Ivoire and used the partitioning data to understand competitive relationships among them. Over a 13-mo period, I measured ecological partitioning in terms of food and canopy stratum use for 2 habituated groups of each guenon species and also collected data on food availability. I found that the study species diverged primarily in food items consumed and vertical strata occupied. Cercopithecus petaurista ate much more foliage than the other species did and used mostly the middle strata (5–20 m). Cercopithecus diana ate primarily fruit and used mostly the upper strata (>20 m). Cercopithecus campbelli ate mostly fruit together with large amounts of animal matter and primarily occupied the ground and low strata (<5 m). Of the specific pairs, the diets of Cercopithecus campbelli/C. diana overlapped the most overall and decreased during the season of low fruit availability. Cercopithecus campbelli and C. diana age/sex classes also overlapped more than the age/sex classes of other species pairs. The results suggest that the potential for competition was more intense for Cercopithecus campbelli/C.diana relations than it is for other species pairs. I compare my results from Taï with those from other primate and guenon communities and demonstrate that dietary overlaps and seasonal dietary divergence are lower in Taï than in most other guenon communities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10764-006-9022-7

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Bergmann, K. (1998). Vergleichende Untersuchungen zer Einnischung derColobisae im Tai-Nationalpark (Elfenbeinkuste) unter besonderer Berucksichtigung des Olivgrunen Stummelaffen (Procolobus versus). M.S. Thesis, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt.
  2. Buzzard, P. J. (2004). Interspecific Competition Among Cercopithecus campbelli, C. petaurista, and C. diana at Taï Forest, Côte d’Ivoire. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Columbia University, New York.
  3. Cords, M. (2000). Mixed species association and group movement. In Boinski, S., and Garber, P. A. (eds.), On the Move: How and Why Animals Travel in Groups, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 73–99.
  4. Galat, G., and Galat-Luong, A. (1985). La communaute de primates diurnes de la foret de Tai. Rev. Ecol. (Terre Vie) 40: 3–32.
  5. Gathua, J. M. (2000). Intraspecific Variation in Foraging Patterns of Redtail Monkeys (Cercopithecus ascanius) in the Kakamega Forest, Kenya. Ph.D. Dissertation, Columbia University, New York.
  6. Korstjens, A. H. (2001). The Mob, the Secret Sorority, and the Phantoms: An Analysis of the Socio-Ecological Strategies of the Three Colobines of Taï, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
  7. Martin, P., and Bateson, P. (1998). Measuring Behavior: An Introductory Guide, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  8. Mayr, E. (1977). Populations, Species, and Evolution, 6th ed., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  9. McGraw, W. S. (1996). Positional Behavior and Habitat Use of Six Monkeys in the Taï Forest, Côte d’Ivoire, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, State University of New York, Stony Brook.
  10. Stoorvogel, J. J. (1993). Gross Inputs and Outputs of Nutrients in Disturbed Forest, Taï Area Côte d’Ivoire, Veenman Drukkers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  11. Struhsaker, T. T. (1978). Food habits of five monkey species in the Kibale Forest, Uganda. In Chivers, D., and Herbert, J. (eds.), Recent Advances in Primatology, Vol. I: Behavior. Academic Press, London, pp. 225–248.
  12. Waser, P. M. (1987). Interactions among primate species. In Smuts, B. B., Wrangham, R. W., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., and Struhsaker, T. T. (eds.), Primate Societies, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 210–226.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buzzard, P. J.
Affiliations
New York Consortium in Evolutionary Primatology (US)
Corresponding author
Buzzard, Paul J.
Venue
International Journal of Primatology
Published
2006-05-23
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
529-558
ISSN
  • 0164-0291 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-8604
OpenAlex
W2056681869
Cited by
64
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Primatology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Leakey Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
Keywords
ecological partitioning, Cercopithecus campbelli, Cercopithecus diana, guenons, diet overlap, interspecific competition, food availability, Taï Forest, primate diet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review