The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation on crowdsourcing research: Current status and future direction
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists
Strauss, A. L. (1987) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511557842 · Cited by 12,277
Design Science in Information Systems Research1
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148625 · Cited by 10,707 · cited 2×
“…Systems (IS) discipline, as well as the state of IS research, has been tightly bound with the notion of the IT artifact because IS research has been traditionally situated around people, organizations, and technology (Benbasat and Zmud 2003; Hevner et al. 2004; Orlikowski and Iacono 2001).”
BackgroundDesign science in information systems research
(2004) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.5555/2017212.2017217 · Cited by 8,254
The Nature of Theory in Information Systems1
Gregor, S. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148742 · Cited by 3,306 · cited 1×
“Gregor (2006) suggests five roles: 1) analyzing ; 2) explaining ; 3) predicting ; 4) explaining and predicting ; 5) design .”
BackgroundLakhani, K. R., & Wolf, R. G. (2003) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.443040 · Cited by 1,531
Incentives and Problem Uncertainty in Innovation Contests: An Empirical Analysis
Boudreau, K. J., Lacetera, N., & Lakhani, K. R. (2011) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1322 · Cited by 830 · cited 2×
“Furthermore, it is worth noting that incentive issues not only rely on the motivation of participants, but also have great relevance with the nature of the problem crowdsourced (Boudreau et al. 2011), and the organizations ’ purposes and objectives.”
BackgroundBa, S., Stallaert, J., & Whinston, A. B. (2001) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.12.3.225.9712 · Cited by 326
Analyzing the past to prepare for the future
(2002) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.5555/2017160.2017162 · Cited by 179
Cited by
Interactive IR User Study Design, Evaluation, and Reporting
Liu, J., & Shah, C. (2019) · Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-02319-4 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, Y., & Zhu, Q.
- Venue
- Information Systems Frontiers
- Published
- 2012-04-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 417-434
- ISSN
- 1387-3326 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9419
- OpenAlex
- W2005856863
- Cited by
- 566
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 48.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation on crowdsourcing research: Current status and future direction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10796-012-9350-4
- The paper
- Zhao, Y., & Zhu, Q. (2014). Evaluation on crowdsourcing research: Current status and future direction. Information Systems Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-012-9350-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
