Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 567

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring the influential factors of continuance intention to use mobile Apps: Extending the expectation confirmation model

Open access
Tam, Carlos, Santos, Diogo, Oliveira, Tiago·2020·Information Systems Frontiers

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10796-018-9864-5

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 81 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Forrester (2016). Integrating mobile in your strategy as a key brand differentiator. In: T. Husson (Ed.) 2016 Mobile And App Marketing Trends.
  2. Perez, S. (2014). "Mobile App Usage Increases In 2014, As Mobile Web Surfing Declines", Flurry Analytics.
  3. Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2014). Smartpls 3. Hamburg: SmartPLS.

Cited by

See all 567

Metadata

Authors
Tam, C., Santos, D., & Oliveira, T.
Venue
Information Systems Frontiers
Published
2018-05-31
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
243-257
ISSN
  • 1387-3326 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9419
OpenAlex
W2590318521
Cited by
567
References
81
FWCI
44.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring the influential factors of continuance intention to use mobile Apps: Extending the expectation confirmation model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10796-018-9864-5
The paper
Tam, C., Santos, D., & Oliveira, T. (2020). Exploring the influential factors of continuance intention to use mobile Apps: Extending the expectation confirmation model. Information Systems Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-018-9864-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.