Cited by 11,728Psychometric Methodologies and TestingAdvanced Statistical Methods and ModelsBusiness Strategies and Management Research

Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research

F. Hair Jr, Joe, Sarstedt, Marko, Hopkins, Lucas, G. Kuppelwieser, Volker·2014·European Business Review

Abstract

Purpose: – The authors aim to present partial least squares (PLS) as an evolving approach to structural equation modeling (SEM), highlight its advantages and limitations and provide an overview of recent research on the method across various fields. Design/methodology/approach: – In this review article, the authors merge literatures from the marketing, management, and management information systems fields to present the state-of-the art of PLS-SEM research. Furthermore, the authors meta-analyze recent review studies to shed light on popular reasons for PLS-SEM usage. Findings: – PLS-SEM has experienced increasing dissemination in a variety of fields in recent years with nonnormal data, small sample sizes and the use of formative indicators being the most prominent reasons for its application. Recent methodological research has extended PLS-SEM's methodological toolbox to accommodate more complex model structures or handle data inadequacies such as heterogeneity. Research limitations/implications: – While research on the PLS-SEM method has gained momentum during the last decade, there are ample research opportunities on subjects such as mediation or multigroup analysis, which warrant further attention. Originality/value: – This article provides an introduction to PLS-SEM for researchers that have not yet been exposed to the method. The article is the first to meta-analyze reasons for PLS-SEM usage across the marketing, management, and management information systems fields. The cross-disciplinary review of recent research on the PLS-SEM method also makes this article useful for researchers interested in advanced concepts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/ebr-10-2013-0128

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
F. Hair Jr, J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & G. Kuppelwieser, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • Middle Georgia State University (US)
Venue
European Business Review
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2014-03-04
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
106-121
ISSN
0955-534X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1591013228
Cited by
11,728
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1004 · 2025: 1634 · 2024: 1960 · 2023: 1967 · 2022: 1609 · 2021: 1319 · 2020: 903 · 2019: 597 · 2018: 346 · 2017: 209 · 2016: 112 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 1
FWCI
162.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Business Review (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalCommons - Kennesaw State University (Kennesaw State University) (submittedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
Keywords
partial least squares structural equation modeling, PLS-SEM, structural equation modeling, formative indicators, non-normal data, small sample size, heterogeneity, mediation analysis, multigroup analysis, market analysis, management research, management information systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review