Cited by 758Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health via Writing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 13 of the 62 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Using Social Media for Social Comparison and Feedback-Seeking: Gender and Popularity Moderate Associations with Depressive Symptoms

Open access
Nesi, Jacqueline, Prinstein, Mitchell J.·2015·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Abstract

This study examined specific technology-based behaviors (social comparison and interpersonal feedback-seeking) that may interact with offline individual characteristics to predict concurrent depressive symptoms among adolescents. A total of 619 students (57 % female; mean age 14.6) completed self-report questionnaires at 2 time points. Adolescents reported on levels of depressive symptoms at baseline, and 1 year later on depressive symptoms, frequency of technology use (cell phones, Facebook, and Instagram), excessive reassurance-seeking, and technology-based social comparison and feedback-seeking. Adolescents also completed sociometric nominations of popularity. Consistent with hypotheses, technology-based social comparison and feedback-seeking were associated with depressive symptoms. Popularity and gender served as moderators of this effect, such that the association was particularly strong among females and adolescents low in popularity. Associations were found above and beyond the effects of overall frequency of technology use, offline excessive reassurance-seeking, and prior depressive symptoms. Findings highlight the utility of examining the psychological implications of adolescents' technology use within the framework of existing interpersonal models of adolescent depression and suggest the importance of more nuanced approaches to the study of adolescents' media use.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10802-015-0020-0

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

33 Own result · 27 No full text of the sources · 15 Own method · 14 Own interpretation · 5 Supported so far · 5 Partly supported · 2 Supported · 2 Sources not found · 1 Couldn’t confirm · 1 Not checked yet · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 44 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 36
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 38
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
61 of 61
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The literature has limited knowledge about adolescents' social experiences via technological media.

    “Although much research has investigated the interactions among these social behaviors, depressive symptoms, and in-person peer interactions in this age group, relatively little is known regarding social experiences that occur through technological media, including Social Networking Sites (SNS, e.g., Facebook) and text messages.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    For some adolescents, greater technology use may go along with more social comparison and feedback-seeking.

    “However, high levels of technology use may be associated with increased levels of these behaviors among some adolescents.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Whether gender and popularity differences appear in online settings has not been rigorously tested.

    “However, the possibility that gender and popularity differences may occur within online contexts has not yet been rigorously examined.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The original ERS scale is not detailed; it only measures how often people seek reassurance that others like and care about them.

    “Another criticism of the original ERS scale is that it lacks detail, simply assessing how often individuals request assurance that others like and care for them.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    SNS features produce an online social environment that differs fundamentally from offline social life.

    “These features create an online social world that is fundamentally different than its offline counterpart.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Self-report measures are commonly used in prior research on technology-use frequency.

    “Self-report measures have been widely used in previous studies assessing frequency of technology use.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many of an adolescent's online connections are only casual acquaintances in offline life.

    “Furthermore, given the very large size of a typical adolescent’s online social network, it is likely that many online connections are mere acquaintances offline.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Adolescent girls are more likely than boys to post photos online.

    “as well as the increased likelihood that girls will post photos compared to boys”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Depressed people tend to prefer comparisons with others they see as equal or worse off.

    “In doing so, depressed individuals may prefer to compare themselves to others perceived to be equal to or less fortunate than them.”
9 of 9

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Consistentt(775) = 3.13reported p = .002 · recomputed p = .002

    “t (775)=3.13, p = .002”

  • Consistentχ²(3) = 24.77reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “χ2(3)=24.77, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(698) = 3.83reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t (698)=3.83, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(698) = -2.86reported p = .004 · recomputed p = .004

    “t (698)=−2.86, p = .004”

  • Consistentt(698) = -3.51reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t (698)=−3.51, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(698) = -4.6reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t (698)=−4.60, p < .001”

6 of 6

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. boyd, d. (2007). Social networking sites: public, private, or what? Knowledge Tree, 13, 28.
  2. Rudolph, K. D. (2009). Adolescent depression. In I. H. Gotlib & C. L. Hammen (Eds.), Handbook of Depression: Second Edition (444–467).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 758

Metadata

Authors
Nesi, J., & Prinstein, M. J.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
  • Nesi, Jacqueline
  • Prinstein, Mitchell J.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Published
2015-04-23
Volume
43
Issue
8
Pages
1427-1438
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
OpenAlex
W2012064690
Cited by
758
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 104 · 2025: 132 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4
FWCI
78.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD055342)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
social media use, social comparison, feedback seeking, depressive symptoms, adolescents, gender differences, popularity, sociometric nominations, reassurance seeking, Facebook, Instagram, mobile phone use
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Depression, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Social Desirability, Feedback, Psychological, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review