The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Parenting Stress through the Lens of Different Clinical Groups: a Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Research has demonstrated an association between parenting stress and child behavior problems, and suggested levels of parenting stress are higher among parents of children at risk for behavior problems, such as those with autism and developmental delay (ASD/DD). The goal of the present study was to conduct a systematic review of parenting stress and child behavior problems among different clinical groups (i.e., ASD/DD, chronic illness, with or at-risk for behavioral and/or mood disorders). We also examined demographic and methodological variables as moderators and differences in overall levels of parenting stress between the clinical groups. This systematic review documents a link between parenting stress and child behavior problems with an emphasis on externalizing behavior. One-hundred thirty-three studies were included for quantitative analysis. Parenting stress was more strongly related to child externalizing (weighted ES r = 0.57, d = 1.39) than internalizing (weighted ES r = 0.37, d = 0.79) problems. Moderation analyses indicated that the association between parenting stress and behavior problems was stronger among studies which had mostly male and clinic-recruited samples. Overall, parenting stress levels were higher for parents of children with ASD/DD compared to parents of children from other clinical groups. Findings document the association between parenting stress and child behavior problems and highlight the importance of assessing parenting stress as part of routine care and throughout behavioral intervention programs, especially for groups of children at high risk for behavior problems, such as children with ASD/DD, in order to identify support for both the parent(s) and child.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1186 · Cited by 36,763
Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533446 · Cited by 16,955
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis
(2019) · doi:10.7758/9781610448864 · Cited by 4,553
Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 Tests
Cochran, W. G. (1954) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001616 · Cited by 3,718 · cited 1×
“The measure I(2) is a modification of Cochrane’s Q test (Cochran 1954), which measures whether the ratio of variation exceeds chance, thereby accounting for the number of studies utilized in the current systematic review with more accuracy (Higgins and Thompson 2002).”
MethodFixed-and random-effects models in meta-analysis.
Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.486 · Cited by 2,977
Manual for the ASEBA preschool forms and profiles
Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. (2000) · Cited by 2,504
Hayes, S. A., & Watson, S. L. (2013) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-012-1604-y · Cited by 1,847 · cited 2×
“Additionally, levels of parenting stress are reportedly higher among parents of children at risk for behavior problems, including those with autism and developmental delay (ASD/DD; Hayes and Watson 2013), chronic illnesses (Cousino and Hazen 2013; Golfenshtein et al.”
Background
Cited by
Neece, C., McIntyre, L. L., & Fenning, R. (2020) · Journal of Intellectual Disability Research · doi:10.1111/jir.12769 · Cited by 344
Parent, child, and situational factors associated with parenting stress: a systematic review
Fang, Y., Luo, J., Boele, M., Windhorst, D., van Grieken, A., & Raat, H. (2024) · European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s00787-022-02027-1 · Cited by 264
Acceptance or Despair? Maternal Adjustment to Having a Child Diagnosed with Autism
Da Paz, N. S., Siegel, B., Coccia, M. A., & Epel, E. S. (2018) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-017-3450-4 · Cited by 89
“Moreover, stress levels appear to be even more elevated for parents of children with ASD compared to parents of children with other types of clinical or medical disorders (Barroso et al. 2017).”
BackgroundParental stress and resilience in autism spectrum disorder and Down syndrome
Pastor-Cerezuela, G., Fernández-Andrés, M.-I., Pérez-Molina, D., & Tijeras-Iborra, A. (2021) · Journal of Family Issues · doi:10.1177/0192513x20910192 · Cited by 82
Alibekova, R., Kai Chan, C., Crape, B., Kadyrzhanuly, K., Gusmanov, A., An, S., Bulekbayeva, S., Akhmetzhanova, Z., Ainabekova, A., Yerubayev, Z., et al. (2022) · Global Mental Health · doi:10.1017/gmh.2022.51 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Barroso, N. E., Mendez, L., Graziano, P. A., & Bagner, D. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
- Published
- 2017-05-29
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 449-461
- ISSN
- 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2835
- OpenAlex
- W2617650851
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 3.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parenting Stress through the Lens of Different Clinical Groups: a Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10802-017-0313-6
- The paper
- Barroso, N. E., Mendez, L., Graziano, P. A., & Bagner, D. M. (2018). Parenting Stress through the Lens of Different Clinical Groups: a Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-017-0313-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
