Cited by 89Family and Disability Support ResearchAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

Acceptance or Despair? Maternal Adjustment to Having a Child Diagnosed with Autism

Open access
Da Paz, Nikko S., Siegel, Bryna, Coccia, Michael A., Epel, Elissa S.·2018·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

Psychological adjustment to having one's child diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder has important implications for a parent's mental health. In a longitudinal study, we examined the association between maternal adjustment to the diagnosis and measures of distress and well-being in 90 mothers of children with autism (baseline and 18 months). We used a novel 30-item scale "Adjustment to the Diagnosis of Autism." Factor analysis identified three dimensions of adjustment: acceptance, self-blame, and despair. Acceptance appeared to be a protective response, as it was associated with lower depressive symptoms, cross-sectionally and over time. Conversely, caregivers with increasing levels of self-blame and despair about the diagnosis over 18 months had worsening of mental health and satisfaction with life during this period.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-017-3450-4

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Da Paz, N. S., Siegel, B., Coccia, M. A., & Epel, E. S.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2018-01-06
Volume
48
Issue
6
Pages
1971-1981
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2782297552
Cited by
89
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
6.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01 AG030424, R24AG048024)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
maternal adjustment, autism spectrum disorder, diagnosis acceptance, self-blame, despair, maternal mental health, depressive symptoms, life satisfaction, mothers of autistic children
MeSH terms
Emotional Adjustment, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adult, Behavior, Child, Child, Preschool, Depression, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mother-Child Relations, Mothers, Personal Satisfaction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review