Cited by 90Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesBehavioral and Psychological Studies

How Does Relaxing the Algorithm for Autism Affect DSM-V Prevalence Rates?

Matson, Johnny L., Hattier, Megan A., Williams, Lindsey W.·2012·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

Although it is still unclear what causes autism spectrum disorders (ASDs), over time researchers and clinicians have become more precise with detecting and diagnosing ASD. Many diagnoses, however, are based on the criteria established within the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM); thus, any change in these diagnostic criteria can have a great effect upon children with ASD and their families. It is predicted that the prevalence of ASD diagnoses will dramatically decrease with the adoption of the proposed DSM-5 criteria in 2013. The aim of this current study was to inspect the changes in prevalence first using a diagnostic criteria set which was modified slightly from the DSM-5 criteria (Modified-1 criteria) and again using a set of criteria which was relaxed even a bit more (Modified-2 criteria). Modified-1 resulted in 33.77 % fewer toddlers being diagnosed with ASD compared to the DSM-IV, while Modified-2 resulted in only a 17.98 % decrease in ASD diagnoses. Children diagnosed with the DSM-5 criteria exhibited the greatest levels of autism symptomatology, but the Mod-1, Mod-2, and DSM-IV groups still demonstrated significant impairments. Implications of these findings are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-012-1582-0

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matson, J. L., Hattier, M. A., & Williams, L. W.
Affiliations
Louisiana State University (US)
Corresponding author
Matson, Johnny L.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2012-06-26
Volume
42
Issue
8
Pages
1549-1556
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2121044970
Cited by
90
References
8
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 6
FWCI
9.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, DSM-5 diagnostic criteria, autism prevalence, DSM-IV, autism symptomatology, toddlers, diagnostic criteria revision
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Prevalence, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review