Cited by 12Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchBehavioral and Psychological StudiesDown syndrome and intellectual disability research

Differences in Stereotypic Behavior in Adults Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorders Using the DSM-IV-TR and the DSM-5

Beighley, Jennifer S., Matson, Johnny L., Rieske, Robert D., Cervantes, Paige E., Goldin, Rachel, Jang, Jina·2014·Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10882-013-9356-y

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies mainly using proposed criteria and retrospective analysis found that compared to previous versions, the DSM-5 ASD criteria applied to a smaller number of adults with stronger tendencies toward restrictive interests and repetitive behaviours.

    “Studies mainly using proposed criteria and retrospective analysis found that compared to previous versions, the DSM-5 ASD criteria applied to a smaller number of adults with stronger tendencies toward restrictive interests and repetitive behaviours (e.g. Beighley et al., 2014; Wilson et al., 2013).”

    From Diagnosis of autism in adulthood: A scoping review (2020) · cites this paper as Beighley et al., 2014

  • Compared to adults who met DSM-IV or ICD-10 criteria only, meeting DSM-5 ASD criteria was associated with higher rates of OCD in adults without intellectual disability, as well as greater overall autistic traits and stereotypic behaviours in adults with intellectual disability.

    “Compared to adults who met DSM-IV or ICD-10 criteria only, meeting DSM-5 ASD criteria was associated with higher rates of OCD in adults without intellectual disability (Wilson et al., 2013), as well as greater overall autistic traits and stereotypic behaviours in adults with intellectual disability (Beighley et al., 2014; Matson et al., 2012).”

    From Diagnosis of autism in adulthood: A scoping review (2020) · cites this paper as Beighley et al., 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beighley, J. S., Matson, J. L., Rieske, R. D., Cervantes, P. E., Goldin, R., & Jang, J.
Affiliations
Louisiana State University (US)
Corresponding author
Beighley, Jennifer S.
Venue
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities
Published
2013-08-18
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
193-202
ISSN
  • 1056-263X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3580
OpenAlex
W2065204658
Cited by
12
References
50
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Keywords
stereotypy, autism spectrum disorder, DSM-5, DSM-IV-TR, diagnostic criteria revision, autistic adults, intellectual disability, repetitive behavior, perseveration, diagnostic classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review