Cited by 145Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Using standardized diagnostic instruments to classify children with autism in the study to explore early development

Open access
Wiggins, Lisa D., Reynolds, Ann, Rice, Catherine E., Moody, Eric J., Bernal, Pilar, Blaskey, Lisa, Rosenberg, Steven A., Lee, Li-Ching +1 more·2015·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

The Study to Explore Early Development (SEED) is a multi-site case-control study designed to explore the relationship between autism spectrum disorder (ASD) phenotypes and etiologies. The goals of this paper are to (1) describe the SEED algorithm that uses the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) and Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) to classify children with ASD, (2) examine psychometric properties of different ASD classification methods, including the SEED method that incorporates rules for resolving ADI-R and ADOS discordance, and (3) determine whether restricted interests and repetitive behaviors were noted for children who had instrument discordance resolved using ADI-R social and communication scores. Results support the utility of SEED criteria when well-defined groups of children are an important clinical or research outcome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-014-2287-3

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 28 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    The SEED criteria are useful for classifying children when well-defined groups are important for clinical or research purposes.

    “Results support the utility of SEED criteria when well-defined groups of children are an important clinical or research outcome.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    SEED criteria also classified 87 children who were classified as ASD by the study clinician but had a mental age less than 24 months.

    “SEED criteria also classified 87 children with ASD also classified as ASD by the study clinician but had a mental age less than 24 months”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    SEED ASD criteria classified 27 more children defined as non-ASD by the clinician than concordant positive ADOS and ADI-R.

    “Likewise, SEED ASD criteria classified 27 more children defined as non-ASD by the clinician than concordant positive ADOS and ADI-R.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The SEED final classifications for the 2,600 children were ASD (n=707), DD (n=995), and POP (n=898).

    “The SEED final classifications for these children were ASD (n = 707), DD (n = 995), and POP (n = 898).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    16.9% of children with a previous ASD diagnosis did not meet SEED criteria for an ASD.

    “We found that 16.9 % of children with a previous ASD diagnosis did not meet SEED criteria for an ASD”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 27
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 15
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Discordant ADI-R and ADOS results were found in 17.6% of children administered a comprehensive developmental evaluation in SEED, supporting previous findings.

    “We found discordant ADI-R and ADOS results in 17.6 % of children administered a comprehensive developmental evaluation in SEED, which supports previous findings (de Bildt te al. 2004; Le Couter et al. 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites de Bildt te al. 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Le Couter et al. 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among 52 children defined as POP who received a comprehensive evaluation but did not meet SEED ASD criteria, 10 had ASD characteristics on the ADOS, 3 on the ADI-R, and 39 neither.

    “There were 52 children defined as POP who received a comprehensive evaluation for ASD but did not meet SEED ASD criteria: 10 had ASD characteristics observed on the ADOS, 3 had ASD characteristics reported on the ADI-R, and 39 did not have ASD characteristics observed on the ADOS or reported on the ADI-R.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Only 372 children had a known previous ASD diagnosis at recruitment; the other 228 children with a previous ASD diagnosis had it reported later by a parent.

    “Only 372 children were reported to have a known previous ASD diagnosis at the time of recruitment; the other 228 children with a previous ASD diagnosis had the diagnosis reported by a parent on the invitation call or during the caregiver interview.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among the 707 children defined as ASD, 600 (84.9%) had a previous ASD diagnosis, 97 (13.7%) had a previous DD but not ASD diagnosis, and 10 (1.4%) were identified from state vital records.

    “Of the 707 children defined as ASD, 600 (84.9 %) had a previous ASD diagnosis, 97 (13.7 %) had a previous DD but not ASD diagnosis, and 10 (1.4 %) were identified from state vital records.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingown data

    A total of 1,017 children who completed a comprehensive evaluation for ASD also had a study clinician complete the OARS-adapted.

    “A total of 1,017 children who completed a comprehensive evaluation for ASD also had a study clinician complete the OARS-adapted to gauge his or her clinical judgment of whether the child met criteria for ASD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    SEED ASD criteria classified 62 more children with a mental age of at least 24 months than concordant positive ADOS and ADI-R, with a slight compromise in specificity but no compromise in PPV and an increase in NPV.

    “Specifically, SEED ASD criteria classified 62 more children with a mental age of at least 24 months than concordant positive ADOS and ADI-R, although there was a slight compromise in specificity (there was no compromise in PPV and an increase in NPV).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Children who had ADI-R and ADOS discordance resolved had some RRB noted on both instruments; only one child with discordance resolved had no RRB noted on either instrument.

    “However, our analyses found that children who had ADI-R and ADOS discordance resolved had some RRB noted on both instruments; only one child who had ADI-R and ADOS discordance resolved did not have any RRB noted on either instrument.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For the 922 children, the ADOS alone yielded the highest sensitivity (.92) but the lowest specificity (.61) compared to other classification schemes.

    “For these children, the ADOS alone yielded the highest sensitivity (.92) but the lowest specificity (.61) compared to other classification schemes (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Of the children defined as ASD in SEED, 84.9% had a previous ASD diagnosis (52.6% at recruitment), 13.7% were identified from community providers as having DD but not ASD, and 1.4% were identified from state vital records.

    “Specifically, of the children defined as ASD in SEED, 84.9 % were identified with a previous ASD diagnosis (52.6 % were identified with a previous ASD diagnosis at the time of recruitment), 13.7 % were identified from community providers as a child with DD (but not ASD) and 1.4 % were identified from state vital records.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The ADOS had high sensitivity but low specificity; sensitivity decreased but specificity improved when the ADOS and ADI-R were used together; sensitivity continued to improve when SEED ASD criteria were applied.

    “For instance, we found high sensitivity but low specificity of the ADOS; sensitivity decreased but specificity improved when the ADOS and ADI-R were used together (concordant positive ADOS and ADI-R). Moreover, sensitivity continued to improve when SEED ASD criteria were applied.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Mean MSEL early learning composite scores were 66.9 for children classified as ASD, 86.3 for DD, and 102.3 for POP.

    “The mean MSEL early learning composite for children in our sample were 66.9 points for children classified as ASD, 86.3 points for children classified as DD, and 102.3 points for children classified as POP”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among 305 children defined as DD who received a comprehensive evaluation but did not meet SEED ASD criteria, 122 (40.0%) had a previous ASD diagnosis and 183 (60.0%) had a previous DD but not ASD diagnosis.

    “There were 305 children defined as DD who received a comprehensive evaluation for ASD but did not meet SEED ASD criteria: 122 (40.0 %) of these children had a previous ASD diagnosis”
    • Also stated in: § Results · plain
      “and 183 (60.0 %) of these children had a previous DD but not ASD diagnosis”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is important for clinical practice and epidemiologic research to develop standardized criteria that can classify and characterize children with ASD.

    “As such, developing standardized criteria that can both classify and characterize children with ASD is important for clinical practice and epidemiologic research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Defining ASD phenotypes is challenging because of heterogeneity in symptom presentation and severity and because diagnosis relies on behavioral criteria.

    “Yet defining ASD phenotypes has been challenging given the heterogeneity in symptom presentation and severity and the reliance on behavioral criteria to define the disorder.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SEED is a multi-site case-control study of children aged 30-68 months designed to explore relationships between ASD phenotypes and etiologies or genetic/environmental risk factors.

    “The Study to Explore Early Development (SEED) is a multi-site case–control study designed to explore the relationship between autism spectrum disorder (ASD) phenotypes and etiologies.”
    • Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
      “The Study to Explore Early Development (SEED) is a multi-site case–control study of children 30–68 months of age designed to explore the relationship between ASD phenotypes and various genetic and environmental risk factors (Schendel et al. 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schendel et al. 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A primary challenge of using ADI-R and ADOS to classify ASD is that their results are not always consistent, and no standard method exists to resolve discordance when one suggests ASD and the other does not.

    “One of the primary challenges of using ADI-R and ADOS scores to classify children with ASD is that results of the ADI-R and ADOS are not always consistent with each other and there is not a standard method to resolve discordance when one instrument suggests the presence of an ASD and the other instrument does not suggest presence of an ASD (de Bildt et al. 2004; Le Couter et al. 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites de Bildt et al. 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Le Couter et al. 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    Using ADI-R and ADOS to classify children with ASD may be advantageous when well-defined groups are important for clinical or research outcomes.

    “Consequently, using the ADI-R and ADOS to classify children with ASD may be advantageous when well-defined groups of children are an important clinical or research outcome (Schendel et al. 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schendel et al. 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The SEED final classification algorithm may help guide other clinical and research decisions when ASD risk is indicated on the ADOS but not the ADI-R, or when detailed sub-classifications are needed.

    “The SEED final classification algorithm may therefore help guide other clinical and research decisions when ASD risk is indicated on the ADOS but not the ADI-R or detailed sub-classifications are needed to explore ASD behavioral presentations and/or risks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Quarterly intrasite reliability was 87% on first-pass ADI-R, 99% on first-pass ADOS, and 100% on second-pass ADI-R/ADOS exercises.

    “Quarterly intrasite reliability among SEED clinicians was 87 % on first-pass ADI-R exercises, 99 % on first-pass ADOS exercises, and 100 % on second-pass ADI-R and ADOS exercises for those who did not achieve reliability on the first pass.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Many proposals have been made to address ADI-R/ADOS discordance or to loosen ADI-R criteria so that they cover a wider ASD spectrum than Autistic Disorder.

    “There have been numerous proposals to resolve ADI-R and ADOS discordance or relax ADI-R criteria to include the broader spectrum of ASD in addition to the formerly defined Autistic Disorder (IMGSAC 2001; Risi et al. 2006; Sung et al. 2005).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites IMGSAC 2001 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Risi et al. 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Sung et al. 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Clinicians administering the ADI-R and ADOS participated in pre-data collection reliability exercises, quarterly maintenance exercises, and yearly fidelity checks.

    “Clinicians who administered the ADI-R and ADOS participated in pre-data collection exercises to establish reliability, at least quarterly exercises to maintain reliability, and at least yearly exercises to verify administration fidelity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The results support previous claims that the ADI-R and ADOS should be used together rather than alone because they offer additive contributions to ASD classification.

    “Our results support previous claims that the ADI-R and ADOS should be used together rather than alone since they offer additive contributions to ASD classification (Risi et al. 2006).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Risi et al. 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    SEED ASD classification based on both the ADI-R and ADOS had a good balance of sensitivity and specificity, supporting the utility of these standardized instruments to classify well-defined groups in clinical practice and research.

    “We found that SEED ASD classification based on results of both the ADI-R and ADOS had a good balance of sensitivity and specificity, which supports the utility of these standardized instruments to classify well-defined groups of children in clinical practice and research studies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The SEED discordance resolution method was designed in consultation with instrument authors and required meeting revised ADOS ASD criteria plus one of three relaxed ADI-R criteria.

    “The SEED method for resolving discordance between results of the ADI-R and ADOS was originally designed in consultation with the instrument authors and required the child to meet ASD criteria on the revised ADOS algorithms and one of three relaxed ADI-R criteria.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The ADI-R was developed to detect Autistic Disorder rather than the broader range of ASD.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationown data

    These findings are significant for shaping future population-based studies that seek an adequate balance of sensitivity and specificity and rely on sample size for statistical power.

    “These findings are significant for shaping the future of population-based studies that seek an adequate balance of sensitivity and specificity and rely on sample size to yield the statistical power needed to conduct etiologic and other analyses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The findings continue to support use of both the ADI-R and ADOS for evaluation of current developmental status and improvement of ASD classification.

    “Thus, our findings continue to support use of both the ADI-R and ADOS for evaluation of current developmental status and improvement of ASD classification.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Clinical judgment took into account all information available to the clinician, which is comparable to best estimate clinical diagnosis.

    “although clinical judgment took into account all information available to the clinician which is comparable to best estimate clinical diagnosis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Relaxed ADI-R criteria are sensitive and efficient for detecting ASD in various populations.

    “These relaxed criteria have been shown to be both sensitive and efficient in detecting children with ASD in a variety of populations (de Bildt et al. 2013; Risi et al. 2006; Sung et al. 2005).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites de Bildt et al. 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Risi et al. 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Sung et al. 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Quarterly inter-site reliability among SEED clinicians was 99% on first-pass and 100% on second-pass ADI-R/ADOS exercises.

    “Overall, quarterly inter-site reliability among SEED clinicians was 99 % on first-pass ADI-R and ADOS exercises and 100 % on second-pass ADI-R and ADOS exercises, for those who did not achieve reliability on the first pass.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The clinician who completed the OARS-adapted was often, but not always, the clinician who administered the ADOS and/or had access to ADI-R results.

    “The clinician who completed the OARS-adapted was often, but not always, the clinician who administered the ADOS and/or had access to ADI-R results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Psychometric analyses were conducted on 922 children who completed a comprehensive evaluation, had the OARS-adapted completed, and had a mental age of at least 24 months.

    “Psychometric properties of the ADOS alone, ADI-R alone, concordant ADI-R and ADOS and SEED ASD criteria were conducted on the sample of children who completed a comprehensive evaluation for ASD, had a study clinician complete the OARS-adapted, and had a mental age of at least 24 months (n = 922).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The ADI-R is not a valid instrument for children with a mental age below 24 months.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Some proposals overlap and define relaxed ADI-R criteria for ASD as meeting cutoff on social or communication domain and being within two points of cutoff on the other domain.

    “Some of these proposals overlap with one another (Risi et al. 2006; Sung et al. 2005) and define relaxed ADI-R criteria for ASD as meeting the cutoff score on the social deficits domain or communication deficits domain and being within two points of the cutoff score on the social or communication domain not met.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Risi et al. 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Sung et al. 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationown data

    These findings indicate caution is needed when classifying children for research based solely on existing diagnoses at recruitment or lack of diagnoses at these young ages.

    “These findings also indicate caution is needed when classifying children for research based solely on existing diagnoses at the time of recruitment or lack of diagnoses at these young ages.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    SEED clinicians have advanced degrees and experience in assessing and diagnosing children with ASD.

    “SEED clinicians have advanced degrees in developmental pediatrics, developmental psychology, clinical psychology and related fields and experience with the assessment and diagnosis of children with ASD.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    These results highlight the heterogeneous nature of ASD and could indicate problems with differential diagnosis, continuous distribution of ASD symptoms in child samples, or selection bias among families who agreed to participate in SEED.

    “These results highlight the heterogeneous nature of ASD and could indicate problems with differential diagnosis, continuous distribution of ASD symptoms in child samples, or selection bias among families who agreed to participate in SEED.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationnone given

    Diagnostic instruments alone cannot replace informed clinical judgment when diagnosing children with ASD.

    “Diagnostic instruments alone cannot replace informed clinical judgment when diagnosing children with ASD.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The ADOS alone yielded the lowest specificity and highest false positive rate compared to other schemes, which could be an artifact of the young mean age and cognitive abilities of the sample.

    “As mentioned previously, the ADOS alone yielded the lowest specificity and highest false positive rate compared to any other classification scheme, which could be an artifact of the young mean age and cognitive abilities of our sample.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
37 of 37
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The SCQ recommends a score of 15 or greater as an indicator of ASD risk.

    “The SCQ recommends a score of 15 points or greater as an indicator of risk for an ASD.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The ADI-R was developed to detect Autistic Disorder rather than the broader range of ASD.

    “The ADI-R criteria were relaxed since the ADI-R was developed to detect individuals with Autistic Disorder rather than the broader range of ASD sought in SEED.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The ADI-R can only be used with children whose mental age is 24 months or older.

    “Clinical judgment was considered for children with a mental age of less than 24 months since the ADI-R is appropriate only for children with a mental age of at least 24 months.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many children with ID also have co-occurring ASD, despite invalid ADI-R scores.

    “However, SEED investigators recognized that many children who have ID also have co-occurring ASD, despite invalid ADI-R scores, and wanted to classify a representative sample of children with ASD.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The ADI-R is not a valid instrument for children with a mental age below 24 months.

    “since low mental age deems the ADI-R invalid”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous analyses found that the SEED final classification criteria had a good balance of sensitivity and specificity compared with clinical judgment of ASD versus another developmental disorder.

    “Previous analyses found that SEED final classification criteria had a good balance of sensitivity and specificity when compared to clinical judgment of whether the child had ASD or another DD, and support the use of these instruments when defining ASD case status in SEED [29].”
  • Kappa agreement between SEED2 final classification status and clinical judgment was 0.71.

    “Moreover, kappa agreement between SEED2 final classification status and clinical judgment was 0.71, reflecting substantial agreement.”

    From DSM-5 criteria for autism spectrum disorder maximizes diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in preschool children (2019) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Methods (Statistical Analyses) compare SEED ASD classification with clinical judgment using sensitivity and specificity, and the Results report those measures. Searches for “SEED2,” “kappa,” and “0.71” found no passage reporting the claimed kappa agreement; this paper’s discussion of SEED classification does not verify that SEED2 figure. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ASD group children satisfied ADOS criteria and either full ADI-R criteria or one of three ADI-R alternatives.

    “Children in the final ASD group (n=1429) met ASD diagnostic criteria on the ADOS and either the full ASD diagnostic criteria on the ADI-R or one of three alternate criteria on the ADI-R, as detailed in Wiggins et al. (34)”
  • Final group classification relied on a multi-stage procedure using gold-standard clinical assessments.

    “We sampled a subset of children enrolled in SEED who had completed a multi-stage process, using gold standard clinical assessments, to determine their final study group classification (ASD, DD, or POP) (34).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Rutter, M., Bailey, A., & Lord, C. (2003a). SCQ: Social Communication Questionnaire. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
  2. Rutter, M., Le Couteur, A., & Lord, C. (2003b). ADI-R: The Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiggins, L. D., Reynolds, A., Rice, C. E., Moody, E. J., Bernal, P., Blaskey, L., Rosenberg, S. A., Lee, L.-C., & Levy, S. E.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente San Jose Medical Center (US)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Wiggins, Lisa D.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2014-10-28
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
1271-1280
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2045685497
Cited by
145
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U10DD000184, U10DD000182, U10DD000181, U01DD000498, U01DD001210, U10DD000183, U10DD000180, U10DD000498)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, ASD classification, Study to Explore Early Development, ADI-R, Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, psychometric properties, restricted and repetitive behaviors, children
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Child, Child Development, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Compulsive Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review