Cited by 226EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health Interventions

Neurofeedback Treatment of Depression and Anxiety

Hammond, D. Corydon·2005·Journal of Adult Development

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10804-005-7029-5

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hammond, D. C.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Hammond, D. Corydon
Venue
Journal of Adult Development
Published
2005-08
Volume
12
Issue
2-3
Pages
131-137
ISSN
  • 1068-0667 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3440
OpenAlex
W2022367511
Cited by
226
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Adult Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
neurofeedback, depression, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, non-pharmacological treatment, drug efficacy, electroconvulsive therapy, transcranial magnetic stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review