Cited by 31Academic integrity and plagiarismEthics in Business and EducationInnovations in Medical Education

Academic Integrity Perceptions Among Health-Professions’ Students: A Cross-Sectional Study in The Middle East

Open access
Kadayam Guruswami, Gomathi, Mumtaz, Sabiha, Gopakumar, Aji, Khan, Engila, Abdullah, Fatima, Parahoo, Sanjai K.·2023·Journal of Academic Ethics

Abstract

A high level of professional integrity is expected from healthcare professionals, and literature suggests a relationship between unethical behavior of healthcare professionals and poor academic integrity behavior at medical school. While academic integrity is well researched in western countries, it is not so in the Middle East, which is characterized by different cultural values that may influence students’ academic integrity conduct. We conducted a cross-sectional study among health-professions students at a university in the Middle East to assess perceptual differences on various cheating behaviors, as well as to explore the reasons underlying the cheating behavior. A validated survey instrument disseminated among first and second-year undergraduate students resulted in 211 complete responses and this data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Pearson’s Chi-square/ Fischer’s exact test was applied to test the association of various factors with academic misconduct. The major determinants of academic misconduct were investigated using Binary Logistic regression model. The conducted analysis and the results showed that preceding cheating behavior was the only factor significantly associated with cheating in the university (p < 0.001). No association was found between cheating behavior and age, college/major, awareness regarding academic integrity, or perception of faculty response. The reasons provided by students for cheating behavior were mainly academic workload and pressure to get a good grade. Various suggestions are made to enhance academic integrity among health-professions students including organizing workshops and events by the university to increase awareness and create an academic integrity culture, providing peer guidance as well as emotional and social support.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10805-022-09452-6

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Culture significantly shapes individual behavior, with individual value systems varying based on socialized culture and moderated by individual experiences.

    “Culture significantly shapes individual behavior, with individual value systems varying based on socialized culture (Triandis, 1989) and moderated by individual experiences (Kadayam Guruswami et al., 2023).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

3 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. occupational therapy domestic and international students.Nurse Education Today, 70(June),13–19. 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.08.005 30125866 · DOI
  2. Teixeira AAC Sanding the Wheels of Growth: Cheating by Economics and Business Students and ‘Real World’ Corruption Journal of Academic Ethics 2013 11 4 269 274 10.1007/s10805-0139192-9 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kadayam Guruswami, G., Mumtaz, S., Gopakumar, A., Khan, E., Abdullah, F., & Parahoo, S. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Wollongong in Dubai (AE)
  • Gulf Medical University (AE)
  • Hamdan Bin Mohammed Smart University (AE)
Venue
Journal of Academic Ethics
Published
2022-07-05
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
231-249
ISSN
  • 1570-1727 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8544
OpenAlex
W4283822734
Cited by
31
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Academic Ethics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Gulf Medical University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
academic integrity, cheating, academic misconduct, health professions students, medical students, academic workload, cultural values, Middle East, peer support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review