Cited by 21Academic integrity and plagiarismEthics in Business and EducationLegal Issues in Education

Academic Misconduct among Business Students: A Comparison of the US and UAE

Williams, Steve, Tanner, Margaret, Beard, Jim, Chacko, Jacob·2014·Journal of Academic Ethics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10805-013-9200-0

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A comparative study of students from the UAE and the USA, using Hofstede's cultural framework, identified that students from the UAE were less likely to perceive poor academic behaviors as misconduct.

    “For example, a comparative study of students from the UAE and the USA, using Hofstede cultural framework, identified that students from the UAE were less likely to perceive poor academic behaviors as misconduct (Williams et al., 2014).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, S., Tanner, M., Beard, J., & Chacko, J.
Affiliations
  • East Texas A&M University (US)
  • University of Arkansas – Fort Smith (US)
  • Abu Dhabi University (AE)
Corresponding author
Williams, Steve
Venue
Journal of Academic Ethics
Published
2014-01-17
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
65-73
ISSN
  • 1570-1727 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8544
OpenAlex
W2081797961
Cited by
21
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Academic Ethics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Issues in Education
Keywords
academic misconduct, cheating, business students, undergraduate students, cross-cultural comparison, United States, United Arab Emirates, individualism-collectivism, theory of planned behavior, academic integrity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review