Cited by 188Seaweed-derived Bioactive CompoundsMarine and coastal plant biologyAlgal biology and biofuel production

Biochemical composition of red, green and brown seaweeds on the Swedish west coast

Open access
Olsson, Joakim, Toth, Gunilla B., Albers, Eva·2020·Journal of Applied Phycology

Abstract

Seaweed biomass has the potential to become an important raw material for bio-based production. The aim of this study was to screen the overall composition of several seaweed species on the Swedish west coast, including some scarcely studied species, to provide fundamentals for evaluation of biorefining potential and to benchmark with already potentially industrially relevant species and commercially important land-based biomasses. Twenty-two common seaweed species (green, red, brown) were collected and the carbohydrate, ash, protein, water and metal contents were measured. Carbohydrate content varied between 237 and 557 g kg −1 dry weight (dw), making it the largest constituent, on a dry weight basis, of most species in the study. Ash, which is considered unwanted in biorefining, ranged between 118 and 419 g kg −1 dw and was the largest constituent in several seaweeds, which were therefore considered unsuitable for biorefining. Protein content was most abundant in the red seaweeds but was generally low in all species (59–201 g kg −1 dw). High contents of several unwanted metals for processing or human consumption were found (e.g. aluminium, arsenic, copper, chromium and nickel), which need to be considered when utilizing seaweeds for certain applications. Potential targets for further biorefinery development mostly include species already known for their potential ( Saccharina latissima , Laminaria digitata and Chondrus crispus ) while some, such as Halidrys siliquosa and Dilsea carnosa , have not been previously noted. However, more detailed studies are required to explore biorefinery processes for these seaweeds, as well as how to potentially cultivate them.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10811-020-02145-w

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Seaweeds and microalgal species growing in polluted waters can accumulate significant concentrations of toxic metals such as arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury, and aluminum.

    “Seaweeds and microalgal species growing in polluted waters, especially those near industrial zones, mining areas, poorly managed sewage systems, or regions exposed to natural geological activity, can accumulate significant concentrations of toxic metals such as arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury, and aluminum [219,220].”

    From Navigating the potential of algal peptides: health effects, market applications, and scientific challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [219]

    The Introduction says seaweeds can take up heavy metals, and the CHN, minerals and metals section reports concerning arsenic levels and elevated lead in several Swedish seaweeds. The paper does not establish the claim for microalgae or seaweeds in polluted waters near the listed pollution sources; it also reports mercury below 0.01 mg kg−1 in every species analysed. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hurd CL, Harrison PJ, Bischof K, Lobban CS (2014a) Adsorption, up- take, accumulation and biomonitors. In: Seaweed ecology and phys- iology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 380-383
  2. Hurd CL, Harrison PJ, Bischof K, Lobban CS (2014b) Nutrients. In: Seaweed ecology and physiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 238-293

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olsson, J., Toth, G. B., & Albers, E.
Affiliations
  • Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
Corresponding author
Albers, Eva
Venue
Journal of Applied Phycology
Published
2020-05-16
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
3305-3317
ISSN
  • 0921-8971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-5176
OpenAlex
W3024658147
Cited by
188
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 2
FWCI
13.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Phycology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Chalmers Tekniska Högskola (Area of Advance Energy)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal plant biology
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
Keywords
red algae, green algae, brown algae, carbohydrate content, ash content, protein content, heavy metals, bioproduction, Saccharina latissima, Laminaria digitata, Chondrus crispus, Halidrys siliquosa, Swedish west coast

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review