Cited by 19Prenatal Screening and DiagnosticsGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal AbnormalitiesAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy

Reproductive outcomes after preimplantation genetic testing in mosaic Turner syndrome: a retrospective cohort study of 100 cycles

Open access
Liao, Jingnan, Luo, Keli, Cheng, Dehua, Xie, Pingyuan, Tan, Yueqiu, Hu, Liang, Lu, Guangxiu, Gong, Fei +1 more·2021·Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to explore the reproductive outcomes of women with Turner syndrome (TS) in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles.Methods A retrospective study of 100 controlled ovarian stimulating cycles, 68 TS (sixty-four mosaic Turner syndrome (MTS) and four pure Turner syndrome (PTS)) women underwent PGT was conducted from 2013 to 2018.Results Embryo X chromosome abnormal rates of TS women were significantly higher than women with normal karyotype (7.04 vs 1.61%, P<0.01). Cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) after PGT-NGS treatment were lower in TS than control (31.15 vs 45.59%, P<0.05). Clinical pregnancy rates per transfer (CPR), miscarriage rates (MR) and live birth rates per transfer (LBR) remained comparable between TS and control group. Reproductive outcomes (X chromosome abnormal rates, CPR, MR, LBR and CLBR) among low (<10%), medium (10-50%) and high (>50%) level 45,X mosaicism groups were not statistically different.Conclusions To avoid high risk of embryo X chromosome abnormalities, prenatal or preimplantation genetic testing should be recommended to mosaic or pure TS patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10815-021-02127-y

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liao, J., Luo, K., Cheng, D., Xie, P., Tan, Y., Hu, L., Lu, G., Gong, F., & Lin, G.
Affiliations
  • Central South University (CN)
  • Reproductive & Genetic Hospital CITIC-Xiangya (CN)
Corresponding author
Lin, Ge
Venue
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
Published
2021-03-06
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
1247-1253
ISSN
  • 0740-7769 (ISSN-L)
  • 1058-0468
  • 1573-7330
OpenAlex
W3134094639
Cited by
19
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China Project (2016YFC1000200)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO.81974230)
  • Hunan Provincial Grant for Innovative Province Construction (2019SK4012)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Keywords
Turner syndrome, mosaic Turner syndrome, preimplantation genetic testing, cumulative live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, controlled ovarian stimulation, reproductive outcomes
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Adult, Aneuploidy, Birth Rate, Blastocyst, Embryo Transfer, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Genetic Testing, Humans, Mosaicism, Pregnancy, Turner Syndrome, Pregnancy Rate, Preimplantation Diagnosis, Live Birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review