The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What Do Objects Want?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Art And Agency: An Anthropological Theory
Gell, A. (1998) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198280132.001.0001 · Cited by 3,460
Cited by
Animate Objects: Shell Trumpets and Ritual Networks in the Greater Southwest
Mills, B. J., & Ferguson, T. J. (2008) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-008-9057-5 · Cited by 82
Swenson, E. (2015) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-014-9202-2 · Cited by 76
The future of archaeological theory
Thomas, J. (2015) · Antiquity · doi:10.15184/aqy.2015.183 · Cited by 63
Exotica in Context: Reconfiguring Prestige, Power and Wealth in the Southern African Iron Age
Moffett, A. J., & Chirikure, S. (2016) · Journal of World Prehistory · doi:10.1007/s10963-016-9099-7 · Cited by 46
Chirikure, S. (2022) · Archaeometry · doi:10.1111/arcm.12784 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Gosden, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 193-211
- ISSN
- 1072-5369 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7764
- OpenAlex
- W2023311075
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What Do Objects Want? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10816-005-6928-x
- The paper
- Gosden, C. (2005). What Do Objects Want? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-005-6928-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
