CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recycling and the material science tetrahedron: Everyday strategies of making in high temperature technologies of Iron Age southern Africa

Chirikure, Shadreck·2022·Archaeometry
DOI 10.1111/arcm.12784
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper applies the Material Science Tetrahedron concept to explore practices of pottery recycling in selected craft activities performed in first and second millennium CE southern Africa. It combines analyses of pottery decorative style on vessels and their fragments used for metal processing with fabric inclusion mineralogy and chemical composition to show that recycling was a sociotechnical endeavour integral to making and remaking everyday things in society. Recycling weaved, along the chaîne opératoire , tapestries of materialities formed by and flowing from relationships between crafting, materials, containers, and humans as part of daily routines of making, provisioning, and consumption.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/arcm.12784

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The material science tetrahedron states that characterization of materials using macroscopic, microscopic, textural, and compositional techniques yields information about their structure, properties, history of process, and performance.

    “As a theoretical approach, the material science tetrahedron states that the characterization of materials using macroscopic, microscopic, textural, and compositional techniques yields information about their structure, properties, history of process, and performance (Chirikure, 2022).”

    From Material Science and the Present and Future of African Archaeology (2023) · cites this paper as Chirikure, 2022

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 71

  1. 10.1007/s10437-018-09323-9 · DOI
  2. Aschwanden H., 1987, Symbols of death an analysis of the consciousness of the Karanga
  3. 10.1016/j.jas.2015.07.007 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.02.029 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1111/arcm.12248 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bisson M. C., 2000, Ancient African metallurgy, 83
  7. 10.1093/oso/9780198860846.003.0007 · DOI
  8. 10.4324/9780203156179-17 · DOI
  9. 10.2307/3858051 · DOI
  10. Childs T. S., 1991, Style, technology, and iron smelting furnaces in Bantu‐speaking Africa, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 10, 331
  11. Chirikure S.(2005).Iron production in Iron Age Zimbabwe: stagnation or innovation(Doctoral dissertation University College London [University of London]).
  12. 10.1007/978-3-319-11641-9 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.013.68 · DOI
  14. 10.4324/9780367810412 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.jaa.2015.05.004 · DOI
  16. Collett D., 1993, The archaeology of Africa: Food, metals and towns, 499
  17. 10.1557/mrs.2015.271 · DOI
  18. Dobres M.‐A., 2000, Technology and social agency. Outlining a practice framework
  19. Dodd A., 1994, Dictionary of ceramics
  20. 10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00016 · DOI
  21. 10.1177/1359183507081897 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/oso/9780198860846.001.0001 · DOI
  23. Fowler K., 2008, Animals and people: Archaeozoological papers in honour of Ina plug, 169
  24. 10.1080/0067270X.2016.1220056 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s10816-005-6928-x · DOI
  26. 10.1080/00438243.1999.9980439 · DOI
  27. 10.1177/135918359900400205 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.2307/3888147 · DOI
  29. 10.3213/1612-1651-10061 · DOI
  30. Hattingh S., 2009, Shona ethnography and the archaeology of the K2 burials, Southern African Humanities, 21, 299
  31. Herbert E. W., 1993, Iron, gender, and power: Rituals of transformation in African societies
  32. 10.1080/00438240903345530 · DOI
  33. Killick D., 2009, Polities and power: Archaeological perspectives on the landscapes of early states, 179
  34. Kingery W. D., 1976, Introduction to ceramics
  35. 10.1017/CBO9780511819582.004 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Leroi‐Gourhan A., 1943, Evolution et Techniques. LHomme et la Mati re
  37. Lindahl A., 1995, Present and past: Ceramics and homesteads: An ethnoarchaeological investigation in the Buhera district, Zimbabwe
  38. Maggs T., 1995, Sandstone crucibles from Mhlopeni, KwaZulu‐Natal: Evidence of precolonial brassworking, Southern African Humanities, 7, 1
  39. Mauss M., 1925, The gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies
  40. 10.2307/3889008 · DOI
  41. Miller D., 1996, The Tsodilo Jewellery: Metalwork from northern Botswana
  42. 10.2307/3889031 · DOI
  43. Miller D., 2010, Indigenous metal melting and casting in southern Africa, South African Archaeological Bulletin, 65, 45
  44. Miller D., 2003, Archaeological bronze processing in Botswana, Proceedings of the Microscopy Society of Southern Africa, 33, 18
  45. Miller D., 2008, Rooiberg revisited–the analysis of tin and copper smelting debris, Historical Metallurgy, 42, 23
  46. 10.3213/1612-1651-10017 · DOI
  47. Mitchell P., 2002, The archaeology of southern Africa
  48. 10.1007/BF01956132 · DOI
  49. Moffett A.J. (2017).Phalaborwa: Where the hammer is heard. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Cape Town.
  50. Ndoro W., 1996, Aspects of African archaeology, 773
  51. 10.1016/j.quaint.2020.03.041 · DOI
  52. 10.1093/oso/9780198860846.003.0002 · DOI
  53. 10.1017/CBO9780511800313 · DOI
  54. 10.15184/aqy.2015.20 · DOI
  55. Pwiti G., 1996, Continuity and change: An archaeological study of farming communities in northern Zimbabwe AD 500–1700
  56. Ruwitah A. R., 1998, Kupakasa: Pre‐colonial cotton production and trade in the Zambezi and save valleys, Zimbabwea, 7, 3
  57. 10.15184/aqy.2020.240 · DOI
  58. 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2000.tb00863.x · DOI · Paper page
  59. Sinclair P., 1982, Chibuene—An early trading site in southern Mozambique, Paideuma, 28, 149
  60. 10.2307/281967 · DOI
  61. 10.2307/3888857 · DOI
  62. 10.1017/S0003598X00096071 · DOI
  63. Thondhlana T. P. (2013).Metalworkers and smelting precincts: technological reconstructions of second millennium copper production around Phalaborwa northern Lowveld of South Africa(Doctoral dissertation UCL [University College London]). 48 1 151 152https://doi.org/10.1080/0067270X.2012.759683 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1111/1475-4754.00019 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Leeuw S. E., 1993, Technological choices: Transformations in material culture since the Neolithic, 238
  66. 10.1080/00438243.1969.9979500 · DOI
  67. 10.1557/PROC-123-89 · DOI
  68. Wagner P. A., 1929, Further notes of ancient bronze smelters in the Waterberg district, Transvaal, South African Journal of Science, 26, 563
  69. Wilmsen E. N., 1982, Settlement in Botswana, Heinemann, Johannesburg, 98
  70. Wilmsen E. N., 1988, Land filled with flies: A political economy of the Kalahari
  71. 10.3213/1612-1651-10125 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chirikure, S.
Venue
Archaeometry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-05-23
Volume
64
Issue
S1
Pages
26-43
ISSN
  • 0003-813X
  • 1475-4754
DOI
10.1111/arcm.12784
Cited by
3
References
2
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review