Cited by 76Historical and Architectural StudiesAmazonian Archaeology and EthnohistoryPosthumanist Ethics and Activism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 151 of the 163 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Materialities of Place Making in the Ancient Andes: a Critical Appraisal of the Ontological Turn in Archaeological Interpretation

Swenson, Edward·2015·Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory

Abstract

This article proposes a heuristic inspired by dialectics to explain the historical relationships between the various entities that constitute the world, as an alternative to teleological perspectives used in archaeology. This heuristic moves away from archaeological, ethnohistorical, historical, and anthropological information as well as life experience. In this perspective, there exist a number of entities that are immersed and intertwined in dialectical, historically contingent, material relationships that may coexist in tension and/or conflict. After explaining this set of elements and their relationships, we apply use this heuristic to explain the Moche phenomenon that developed on the north coast of Peru between the III and VII centuries AD.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10816-014-9202-2

Cites

151 of 151 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

12 of the 163 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Bawden, G. (1996). The Moche. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  2. Campana, C. (2000). Technologias constructivas de tierra en la Costa Norte prehispanica. Trujillo: Instituto Nacional de Cultura.
  3. Candea, M. (2010). Ontology is just another word for culture; for the motion 2. Critique of anthropology, 30(2), 172–179. S. Venkatesan (Ed.).
  4. Castillo, L. J. (2010). Moche politics in the Jequetepeque Valley: a case for political opportunism. In L. J. Castillo & J. Quilter (Eds.), New perspectives in Moche political organization (pp. 83–109). Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks.
  5. Castillo, L. J., & Donnan, C. B. (1994). Los Mochica del norte y los Mochica del sur. In K. Makowski & C. B. Donnan (Eds.), Vicús (pp. 143–181). Lima: Colección Arte y Tesoros del Perú, Banco de Credito.
  6. Deleuze, G. (1992). The fold. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. B Cache, trans.
  7. Dillehay, T. D., Kolata, A. L., & Swenson, E. R. (2009). Paisajes culturales en el Valle del Jequetepeque: Los yacimientos arqueológicos. Lima: Ediciones Sian.
  8. Hicks, D., & Beaudry, M. C. (2010). Introduction: material culture studies: a reactionary view. In D. Hicks & M. C. Beaudry (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of material culture studies (pp. 1–24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. Hill, E. (2008). Animism and sacrifice: reconstructing Moche religion through architecture, iconography, and archaeological features. In L. Fogelin, L. (Ed.), Religion, archaeology, and the material world (pp. 38–60). Carbondale: Center for Archaeological Investigations Occasional Paper No. 36.
  10. Huston, S. R. (2010). Dwelling, identity and the Maya: relational archaeology at Chunchucmil. Lanham: Altamira.
  11. Joyce, R. (2008). Practice in and as deposition. In B. J. Mills & W. H. Walker (Eds.), Memory, materiality, and depositional practice (pp. 25–40). Santa Fe: SAR Press.
  12. Knappett, C. (2004). The affordances of things: a post-Gibsonian perspective on the relationality of mind and matter. In E. DeMarrais, C. Gosden, & C. Renfrew (Eds.), Rethinking materiality: the engagement of mind with the material world (pp. 43–51). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Knappett, C. (2011). Network of objects, meshwork of things. In T. Ingold (Ed.), Redrawing anthropology: materials, movements, and lines (pp. 45–64). Farnham: Ashgate.
  14. Lynn, G. (2004). Animate form. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
  15. Meskell, L. (2004). Divine things. In E. DeMarrais, C. Gosden, & C. Renfrew (Eds.), Rethinking materiality: the engagement of mind with the material world (pp. 249–260). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Mills, B. J., & Walker, W. H. (Eds.). (2008). Memory, materiality, and depositional practice. Santa Fe: SAR Press.
  17. Nilsson Stutz, L. (2008). Capturing mortuary ritual: an attempt to harmonize archaeological method and theory. In L. Fogelin, L. (Ed.), Religion, archaeology, and the material world (pp. 159–178). Carbondale: Center for Archaeological Investigations Occasional Paper No. 36.
  18. O’Shea, S. (2000). The perfect heresy. New York: Walker and Company.
  19. Patterson, T. C. (1985). Pachacamac: an Andean oracle under Inca rule. In D. P. Kvietok & D. H. Sandweiss (Eds.), Recent studies in Andean prehistory and ethnohistory (pp. 159–176). Ithaca: Cornell University.
  20. Rowlands, M. (2004). The materiality of sacred power. In E. DeMarrais, C. Gosden, & C. Renfrew (Eds.), Rethinking materiality: the engagement of mind with the material world (pp. 197–204). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  21. Swenson, E., Chiguala, J., & Warner, J. (2007). Proyecto de investigación de arqueología, Jatanca-Huaca Colorada, Valle de Jequetepeque 2006. Lima: Technical report submitted to the Instituto Nacional de Cultura.
  22. Swenson, E., Chiguala, J., & Warner, J. (2008). Proyecto de investigación de arqueología, Jatanca-Huaca Colorada, Valle de Jequetepeque 2007. Lima: Technical report submitted to the Instituto Nacional de Cultura.
  23. Swenson, E., Chiguala, J., & Warner, J. (2009). Proyecto de investigación de arqueología, Jatanca-Huaca Colorada, Valle de Jequetepeque 2008. Lima: Technical report submitted to the Instituto Nacional de Cultura.
  24. Swenson, E., Chiguala, J., & Warner, J. (2011). Proyecto de investigación de arqueología, Jatanca-Huaca Colorada, Valle de Jequetepeque 2010. Lima: Technical report submitted to the Ministerio de Cultura.
  25. Swenson, E., Chiguala, J., & Warner, J. (2012). Proyecto de investigación de arqueología, Jatanca-Huaca Colorada, Valle de Jequetepeque 2011. Lima: Technical report submitted to the Ministerio de Cultura.
  26. Uceda, S. (2010). Theocracy and secularism: relationships between the temple and urban nucleus and political change at the Huacas de Moche. In J. Quilter & L. J. Castillo (Eds.), New perspectives on Moche political organization (pp. 132–158). Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks.
  27. Uceda, S., & Mujica, E. (Eds.). (2003). Moche hacia el final del milenio (volumes 1 and 2). Lima: Fondo Editorial, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú and Universidad Nacional de Trujillo.
  28. Van Dyke, R. (2011). Ideology and social memory. In R. Bernbeck & R. H. McGuire (Eds.), Ideologies in archaeology (pp. 233–253). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  29. Venkatesen, S. (2010). Ontology is just another word for culture; introduction. Critique of anthropology, 30(2), 152–156. S. Venkatesan (Ed.). · DOI
  30. Verano, J. (2001). 2001 War and death in the Moche world: osteological evidence and visual discourse. In J. Pillsbury (Ed.), Moche art and archaeology in ancient Peru (pp. 111–126). New Haven: Yale University Press.
  31. Weismantel, M. (2013). Inhuman eyes: looking at Chavín de Huantar. In C. Watts (Ed.), Relational archaeologies: humans, animals, things (pp. 1–20). London: Routledge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Swenson, E.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Swenson, Edward
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
Published
2014-01-30
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
677-712
ISSN
  • 1072-5369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7764
OpenAlex
W2132830415
Cited by
76
References
163
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
51.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Historical and Architectural Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Keywords
place-making, materiality, ontological turn, non-representational theory, non-anthropocentrism, Moche, Jequetepeque Valley, Andean archaeology, architectural transformation, ritual, political organization, personhood, materialism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review