Cited by 20

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Late Prehispanic Economy of the Valley of Oaxaca, Mexico: Weaving Threads from Data, Theory, and Subsequent History

Feinman, Gary M., Nicholas, Linda M.·2012·Research in Economic Anthropology

Abstract

Purpose – A reevaluation of the theoretical underpinnings that have been used to interpret the prehispanic highland Mesoamerican economy, with a primary focus on the Classic and Postclassic periods in the Valley of Oaxaca.Approach – Models of prehispanic Mesoamerican economies have long been derived from theoretical constructs broadly associated with Marx's Asiatic mode of production, specifically the writings of Wittfogel and Polanyi, which emphasized centralized control of irrigation and managed systems of production and distribution. Yet, for the Valley of Oaxaca, ethnographic data point to smaller-scale, more flexible systems of production, the importance of market exchange, and mechanisms for domestic cooperation. Drawing on residential excavation data from three Classic-period sites, systematic regional surveys, and other sources, the authors find that the data from the prehispanic era conform much more closely to the ethnographic findings than the long-standing theoretical constructs. New directions for modeling the prehispanic highland Mesoamerican economy are outlined.Findings – The chapter's empirical focus is on the Classic-period domestic economy in the Valley of Oaxaca, where many households engaged in multicrafting and produced nonsubsistence goods for exchange. The archaeological data do not support the long-held view that most domestic units were self-sufficient.Originality/value – The chapter draws on and synthesizes the theoretical implications from decades…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/s0190-1281(2012)0000032013

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Great Zimbabwe's political economy was neither command-based nor fixed market-based.

    “With such a mix of strategies, Great Zimbabwe's political economy was neither command-based nor fixed market-based (e.g., Feinman and Nicholas 2012).”

    From New Perspectives on the Political Economy of Great Zimbabwe (2020) · cites this paper as Feinman and Nicholas 2012

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1525/cag.1998.20.2-3.78 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/s10814-005-9001-0 · DOI
  3. 10.1017/S0022050705050072 · DOI
  4. 10.1179/009346996791973710 · DOI
  5. 10.1086/soutjanth.26.3.3629379 · DOI
  6. 10.1023/B:JARM.0000047316.02424.7c · DOI
  7. 10.1525/aa.1984.86.3.02a00100 · DOI
  8. 10.1017/S0003598X00083083 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1007/s10814-010-9045-7 · DOI
  10. 10.1525/aa.1970.72.4.02a00020 · DOI
  11. Feinman G.M., 2007, Mexicon, 29, 3
  12. 10.2307/529837 · DOI
  13. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.105118 · DOI
  14. 10.2307/972162 · DOI
  15. 10.1017/S0956536104040155 · DOI
  16. 10.1086/204759 · DOI
  17. Horcasitas F., 1955, Mesoamerican Notes, 4, 13
  18. 10.1023/A:1013786700137 · DOI
  19. 10.2307/279669 · DOI
  20. 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000351 · DOI
  21. 10.1525/aa.2003.105.2.313 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/0278-4165(83)90007-7 · DOI
  23. Morrison K., 1994, Asian Perspectives, 33, 183
  24. 10.2307/279985 · DOI
  25. 10.2307/279987 · DOI
  26. Palerm A., 1957, Pan American Union Social Science Monograph, 3, 1
  27. 90. K. Polanyi, C. Arensberg, H. Pearson, ed. 1957.
  28. 10.1086/229967 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1469-8676.1994.tb00264.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Feinman, G. M., & Nicholas, L. M.
Venue
Research in Economic Anthropology
Published
2012-01
Pages
225-258
ISSN
0190-1281
Cited by
20
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review