The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Late Prehispanic Economy of the Valley of Oaxaca, Mexico: Weaving Threads from Data, Theory, and Subsequent History
Abstract
Purpose – A reevaluation of the theoretical underpinnings that have been used to interpret the prehispanic highland Mesoamerican economy, with a primary focus on the Classic and Postclassic periods in the Valley of Oaxaca.Approach – Models of prehispanic Mesoamerican economies have long been derived from theoretical constructs broadly associated with Marx's Asiatic mode of production, specifically the writings of Wittfogel and Polanyi, which emphasized centralized control of irrigation and managed systems of production and distribution. Yet, for the Valley of Oaxaca, ethnographic data point to smaller-scale, more flexible systems of production, the importance of market exchange, and mechanisms for domestic cooperation. Drawing on residential excavation data from three Classic-period sites, systematic regional surveys, and other sources, the authors find that the data from the prehispanic era conform much more closely to the ethnographic findings than the long-standing theoretical constructs. New directions for modeling the prehispanic highland Mesoamerican economy are outlined.Findings – The chapter's empirical focus is on the Classic-period domestic economy in the Valley of Oaxaca, where many households engaged in multicrafting and produced nonsubsistence goods for exchange. The archaeological data do not support the long-held view that most domestic units were self-sufficient.Originality/value – The chapter draws on and synthesizes the theoretical implications from decades…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Great Zimbabwe's political economy was neither command-based nor fixed market-based.
“With such a mix of strategies, Great Zimbabwe's political economy was neither command-based nor fixed market-based (e.g., Feinman and Nicholas 2012).”
From New Perspectives on the Political Economy of Great Zimbabwe (2020) · cites this paper as Feinman and Nicholas 2012
Citations
Cites
Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation
Sewell Jr., W. H. (2005) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226749198.001.0001 · Cited by 1,410
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- 10.1525/cag.1998.20.2-3.78 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10814-005-9001-0 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0022050705050072 · DOI
- 10.1179/009346996791973710 · DOI
- 10.1086/soutjanth.26.3.3629379 · DOI
- 10.1023/B:JARM.0000047316.02424.7c · DOI
- 10.1525/aa.1984.86.3.02a00100 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0003598X00083083 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10814-010-9045-7 · DOI
- 10.1525/aa.1970.72.4.02a00020 · DOI
- Feinman G.M., 2007, Mexicon, 29, 3
- 10.2307/529837 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.105118 · DOI
- 10.2307/972162 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0956536104040155 · DOI
- 10.1086/204759 · DOI
- Horcasitas F., 1955, Mesoamerican Notes, 4, 13
- 10.1023/A:1013786700137 · DOI
- 10.2307/279669 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000351 · DOI
- 10.1525/aa.2003.105.2.313 · DOI
- 10.1016/0278-4165(83)90007-7 · DOI
- Morrison K., 1994, Asian Perspectives, 33, 183
- 10.2307/279985 · DOI
- 10.2307/279987 · DOI
- Palerm A., 1957, Pan American Union Social Science Monograph, 3, 1
- 90. K. Polanyi, C. Arensberg, H. Pearson, ed. 1957.
- 10.1086/229967 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-8676.1994.tb00264.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
New Perspectives on the Political Economy of Great Zimbabwe
Chirikure, S. (2020) · Journal of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1007/s10814-019-09133-w · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Feinman, G. M., & Nicholas, L. M.
- Venue
- Research in Economic Anthropology
- Publisher
- Emerald Group Publishing Limited
- Published
- 2012-01
- Pages
- 225-258
- ISSN
- 0190-1281
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review