Cited by 102Archaeological Research and ProtectionUrban Design and Spatial AnalysisArchaeology and Cultural Heritage

Least-cost Paths – Some Methodological Issues

Open access
Herzog, Irmela·2014·Internet Archaeology

Abstract

This article deals with methodological issues connected with least-cost path (LCP) calculations in archaeology. The number of LCP studies in archaeology has increased rapidly during the last couple of years, but not all of the approaches applied are based on an appropriate model and implementation. Many archaeologists rely on standard GIS software with default settings for calculating LCPs and are not aware of possible alternatives and the pitfalls that are described in this article. After briefly introducing the aims and applications of LCP methods in archaeology, LCP algorithms are discussed. The outcome of the LCP calculations depends not only on the algorithm but also on the cost model, which often includes several cost components. The discussion of the cost components has a focus on slope, because nearly all archaeological LCP studies take this cost component into account and because several methodological issues are connected with slope-based cost models. Other possible cost components are: the load of the walker, vegetation cover, wetlands or other soil properties, travelling and transport on water, water as barrier and as attractor, aspect, altitude, and social or cultural cost components. Eventually, advantages and disadvantages of different ways of combining cost components are presented. Based on the methodological issues I conclude that both validation checks and variations of the model are necessary to analyse the reliability of archaeological LCP results.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.11141/ia.36.5

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Barbe, F. 2007 Karolingische Fernwege in Hessen und Westfalen. Etappenstationen und Straßenfesten an der 'Nordstraße', Magister-Hausarbeit im Fach Vor- und Frühgeschichte, Phillips-Universität Marburg.
  2. 10.2307/4126242 · DOI
  3. 10.1017/CBO9780511807459 · DOI
  4. 10.1080/00140139208967822 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/13658810903401016 · DOI
  6. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1985)111:2(114) · DOI
  7. Kantner, J. and Hobgood, R. 2003 'Digital technologies and prehistoric landscapes in the American Southwest' in Mauricio Forte and P.R. Williams (eds) The Reconstruction of Archaeological Landscapes through Digital Technologies, Proceedings of the 1st Italy-United States workshop, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, Nov 1-3 2001, BAR International Series 1151. 117–24.
  8. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.07.020 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herzog, I.
Corresponding author
Herzog, Irmela
Venue
Internet Archaeology
Published
2014
Issue
36
ISSN
1363-5387 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2328580790
Cited by
102
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
8.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Internet Archaeology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Archaeological Research and Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
least-cost path analysis, cost model, cost components, model validation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review