Demarcating the Realm of Cognition
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/58.1.7 · Cited by 5,457 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…process may count as cognitive if it meets the functional equivalence criterion required by the ‘‘parity principle,’’ i.e., if it ‘‘functions as a process which, were it done in the head, we would have no hesitation in recognizing as part of the cognitive process’’ (Clark and Chalmers 1998, 8).”
BackgroundInter-Brain Synchronization during Social Interaction
Dumas, G., Nadel, J., Soussignan, R., Martinerie, J., & Garnero, L. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012166 · Cited by 966 · see citing works
Quoidbach, J., Berry, E. V., Hansenne, M., & Mikolajczak, M. (2010) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.048 · Cited by 660 · see citing works
Feldman, R. (2012) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5834.2011.00660.x · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Interactive Regulation of Affect in Postpartum Depressed Mothers and Their Infants: An Overview
Reck, C., Hunt, A., Fuchs, T., Weiss, R., Noon, A., Moehler, E., Downing, G., Tronick, E. Z., & Mundt, C. (2004) · Psychopathology · doi:10.1159/000081983 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Ham, J., & Tronick, E. (2009) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503300802609672 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Dynamics of emotion regulation in infants of clinically depressed and nondepressed mothers
Manian, N., & Bornstein, M. H. (2009) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02166.x · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cassinadri, G. (2024) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-024-00701-7 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“In addition, there is no shared agreement in defining a necessary and or sufficient mark of what cognition is (Facchin, 2023; Varga, 2017), thus making it difficult to establish whether an external component may respect such a mark (Adams and Aizawa 2008).”
BackgroundMoral Reasons Not to Posit Extended Cognitive Systems: a Reply to Farina and Lavazza
Cassinadri, G. (2022) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-022-00560-0 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Varga, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Memphis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Varga, Somogy
- ORCID
- Varga, Somogy
- Venue
- Journal for General Philosophy of Science
- Published
- 2017-09-06
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 435-450
- ISSN
- 0044-2216 (ISSN-L)
- 0925-4560
- OpenAlex
- W2752981751
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 0.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal for General Philosophy of Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
- Keywords
- extended mind, emotion regulation, infants, philosophy of mind, cognitive science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review