Cited by 10Embodied and Extended CognitionPhilosophy and Theoretical SciencePhilosophy and History of Science

Demarcating the Realm of Cognition

Varga, Somogy·2018·Journal for General Philosophy of Science

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10838-017-9375-y

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Varga, S.
Affiliations
University of Memphis (US)
Corresponding author
Varga, Somogy
Venue
Journal for General Philosophy of Science
Published
2017-09-06
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
435-450
ISSN
  • 0044-2216 (ISSN-L)
  • 0925-4560
OpenAlex
W2752981751
Cited by
10
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal for General Philosophy of Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
extended mind, emotion regulation, infants, philosophy of mind, cognitive science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review