Cited by 24Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Racial, ethnic, and sex disparities in atrial fibrillation management: rate and rhythm control

Open access
Gomez, Sofia E., Fazal, Muhammad, Nunes, Julio C., Shah, Shayena, Perino, Alexander C., Narayan, Sanjiv M., Tamirisa, Kamala P., Han, Janet K. +2 more·2022·Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology

Abstract

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects around 6 million Americans. AF management involves pharmacologic therapy and/or interventional procedures to control rate and rhythm, as well as anticoagulation for stroke prevention. Different populations may respond differently to distinct management strategies. This review will describe disparities in rate and rhythm control and their impact on outcomes among women and historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups. Methods This is a narrative review exploring the topic of sex and racial and/or ethnic disparities in rate and rhythm management of AF. We describe basic terminology, summarize AF epidemiology, discuss diversity in clinical research, and review landmark clinical trials. Results Despite having higher rates of traditional AF risk factors, Black and Hispanic adults have lower risk of AF than non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients, although those with AF experience more severe symptoms and report lower quality-of-life scores than NHW patients with AF. NHW patients receive antiarrhythmic drugs, cardioversions, and invasive therapies more frequently than Black and Hispanic patients. Women have lower rates of AF than men, but experience more severe symptoms, heart failure, stroke, and death after AF diagnosis. Women and people from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds are inadequately represented in AF trials; prevalence findings may be a result of underdetection. Conclusion Race, ethnicity, and gender are social determinants of health that may impact the prevalence, evolution, and management of AF. This impact reflects differences in biology as well as disparities in treatment and representation in clinical trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10840-022-01383-x

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gomez, S. E., Fazal, M., Nunes, J. C., Shah, S., Perino, A. C., Narayan, S. M., Tamirisa, K. P., Han, J. K., Rodriguez, F., & Baykaner, T.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Baykaner, Tina
Venue
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Published
2022-10-13
Volume
66
Issue
5
Pages
1279-1290
ISSN
  • 1383-875X (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8595
OpenAlex
W4304762580
Cited by
24
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K24HL103800, R01HL083359, K01HL144607, K23HL145017, R01HL149134, R01HL122384)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, racial and ethnic disparities, sex disparities, rate control, rhythm control, antiarrhythmic drugs, cardioversion, underrepresentation in clinical trials, social determinants of health, stroke risk, quality of life, Black patients, Hispanic patients, women
MeSH terms
White, Adult, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Atrial Fibrillation, Black or African American, Ethnicity, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Sex Factors, United States, Stroke, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review