Cited by 61Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsCollagen: Extraction and CharacterizationHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications

A novel method for the fabrication of homogeneous hydroxyapatite/collagen nanocomposite and nanocomposite scaffold with hierarchical porosity

Shen, Xinyu, Chen, Li, Cai, Xuan, Tong, Tong, Tong, Hua, Hu, Jiming·2011·Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine

Abstract

Homogeneous nanocomposites composed of hydroxyapatite (HAp) and collagen were synthesized using a novel in situ precipitation method through dual template-driven. The morphological and componential properties of nanocomposites were investigated. The HAp particulates, in sizes of about 50-100 nm, were distributed homogeneously in the organic collagen hydrogel. Highly magnified TEM observation showed that HAp inorganic particles were composed of fine sub-particles (2-5 nm) without regular crystallographic orientation. Based on these homogeneous nanocomposites, a novel HAp/collagen nanocomposite scaffold with hierarchical porosity was prepared by multilevel freeze-drying technique. Compared to other conventional scaffolds for tissue engineering, this novel in situ method endows synthesized composite scaffolds with unique morphology-ultrafine HAp particles dispersed homogenously in collagen at nano level and the foam scaffold with hierarchical pore structures. The mechanical performance increased obviously compared with neat collagen. These results provided an efficient approach toward new biomimetic tissue scaffold for the biomedical applications with enhanced intensity/bioactivity and controlled resorption rates. This novel method, we expect, will lead to a wide application in many other hydrogel systems and may be useful for fabrication of various homogeneous inorganic/organic nanocomposites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10856-010-4199-x

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shen, X., Chen, L., Cai, X., Tong, T., Tong, H., & Hu, J.
Affiliations
  • Wuhan University (CN)
  • Wuhan Institute of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Tong, Hua
Venue
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
Published
2010-12-14
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
299-305
ISSN
  • 0957-4530 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-4838
OpenAlex
W1971125233
Cited by
61
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Materials Science Materials in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Collagen: Extraction and Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
Keywords
in situ precipitation, collagen gel, hierarchical porosity, tissue engineering scaffolds, mechanical properties, biomimetic scaffolds, nanocomposite morphology
MeSH terms
Bone Regeneration, Collagen, Freeze Drying, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Particle Size, Stress, Mechanical, Porosity, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared, Durapatite, Bone Substitutes, Tissue Engineering, Biomimetics, Nanotechnology, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, Nanocomposites

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review