Cited by 122Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Placebo Effect

Immediate effects of a brief mindfulness-based body scan on patients with chronic pain

Ussher, Michael, Spatz, Amy, Copland, Claire, Nicolaou, Andrew, Cargill, Abbey, Amini-Tabrizi, Nina, McCracken, Lance M.·2014·Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) has benefits for those with chronic pain. MBSR typically entails an intensive 8-week intervention. The effects of very brief mindfulness interventions are unknown. Among those with chronic pain, the immediate effects of a 10 min mindfulness-based body scan were compared with a control intervention. Fifty-five adult outpatients were randomly assigned to either: (1) mindfulness-based body scan (n = 27) or (2) a reading about natural history (control group, n = 28), provided via a 10 min audio-recording. Interventions were delivered twice across 24 h; once in the clinic and once in participants' 'normal' environment. Immediately before and after listening to the recording, participants rated pain severity, pain related distress, perceived ability for daily activities, perceived likelihood of pain interfering with social relations, and mindfulness. In the clinic, there was a significant reduction in ratings for pain related distress and for pain interfering with social relations for the body scan group compared with the control group (p = 0.005; p = 0.036, respectively). In the normal environment none of the ratings were significantly different between the groups. These data suggest that, in a clinic setting, a brief body scan has immediate benefits for those experiencing chronic pain. These benefits need to be confirmed in the field.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10865-012-9466-5

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ussher, M., Spatz, A., Copland, C., Nicolaou, A., Cargill, A., Amini-Tabrizi, N., & McCracken, L. M.
Affiliations
  • St George's, University of London (GB)
  • St George's Hospital (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Ussher, Michael
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2012-11-06
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
127-134
ISSN
  • 0160-7715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3521
OpenAlex
W2038912576
Cited by
122
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
chronic pain, mindfulness-based stress reduction, brief mindfulness intervention, pain-related distress, pain intensity, social functioning, outpatients
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological, Treatment Outcome, Chronic Pain, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review