Cited by 20Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchCancer survivorship and care

Feasibility study to assess the effect of a brief mindfulness intervention for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Perkins-Porras, Linda, Riaz, Muhammad, Okekunle, Adeoba, Zhelezna, Svitlana, Chakravorty, Indranil, Ussher, Michael·2018·Chronic Respiratory Disease

Abstract

Psychological distress is common among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to assess whether a 10-minute mindfulness intervention reduces distress and breathlessness, improves mood and increases mindfulness among hospital inpatients following acute exacerbation of COPD.Fifty patients were recruited following an acute admission. The immediate effects of a 10-minute mindfulness-based body scan were compared with a control intervention. Participants were randomized to receive either a mindfulness-based body scan ( n = 24) or a control condition ( n = 26) via a 10-minute audio recording. Participants completed a self-assessment survey, including the Borg scale for breathlessness, Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. They then completed six brief single item measures of dyspnoea, anxiety, depression, happiness, stress and mindfulness before and after the intervention daily for three consecutive days. Acceptability was rated according to 'usefulness' and whether they would recommend the intervention to other patients. Results showed that there was a tendency for change in most outcomes, but no significant differences between the groups. Most participants rated the intervention as useful and would recommend it. Existing knowledge of mindfulness interventions among these patients is very limited and this study may be helpful in the development of other brief interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1479972318766140

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A 10-minute mindfulness-based intervention in patients with COPD showed no significant difference between groups in depression, anxiety, happiness, dyspnoea, mindfulness and stress.

    “A 10-minute MBI in patients with COPD has shown a changing tendency in the outcomes of the intervention group, including depression, anxiety, happiness, dyspnoea, mindfulness and stress. While no significant difference exists among groups, most participants supposed that the mindfulness interventions were useful and were glad to recommend it.16”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [24]Hayes S Strosahl K Wilson K Acceptance and commitment therapy: an experimental approach to behaviour change. New York: Guilford Press, 1999.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perkins-Porras, L., Riaz, M., Okekunle, A., Zhelezna, S., Chakravorty, I., & Ussher, M.
Affiliations
  • St George's, University of London (GB)
  • University of London (GB)
  • Sports Surgery Clinic (IE)
  • St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Perkins-Porras, Linda
Venue
Chronic Respiratory Disease
Published
2018-04-24
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
400-410
ISSN
  • 1479-9723 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-9731
OpenAlex
W2801039930
Cited by
20
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chronic Respiratory Disease (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • St George's Online Research Archive (St George's University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Research Online (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
St. George's, University of London
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute exacerbation, psychological distress, anxiety, depression, dyspnea, body scanning, brief intervention, hospitalized patients, treatment acceptability, mood
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Depression, Dyspnea, Feasibility Studies, Female, Happiness, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Stress, Psychological, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review