Cited by 5Cardiac Arrest and ResuscitationMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCardiac Health and Mental Health

The relationship between mindfulness and enduring somatic threat severity in long-term cardiac arrest survivors.

Open access
Presciutti, Alexander M., Bannon, Sarah M., Yamin, Jolin B., Newman, Mary M., Parker, Robert A., Elmer, Jonathan, Wu, Ona, Donnino, Michael W. +2 more·2023·Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background: Cardiac arrest (CA) survivors experience continuous exposures to potential traumas though chronic cognitive, physical and emotional sequelae and enduring somatic threats (ESTs) (i.e., recurring somatic traumatic reminders of the event). Sources of ESTs can include the daily sensation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), ICD-delivered shocks, pain from rescue compressions, fatigue, weakness, and changes in physical function. Mindfulness, defined as non-judgmental present-moment awareness, is a teachable skill that might help CA survivors cope with ESTs. Here we describe the severity of ESTs in a sample of long-term CA survivors and explore the cross-sectional relationship between mindfulness and severity of ESTs. Methods: We analyzed survey data of long-term CA survivors who were members of the Sudden Cardiac Arrest Foundation (collected 10–11/2020). We assessed ESTs using 4 cardiac threat items from the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-revised (items range from 0 "very little" to 4 "very much") which we summed to create a score reflecting total EST burden (range 0–16). We assessed mindfulness using the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised. First, we summarized the distribution of EST scores. Second, we used linear regression to describe the relationship between mindfulness and EST severity adjusting for age, gender, time since arrest, COVID-19-related stress, and loss of income due to COVID. Results: We included 145 CA survivors (mean age: 51 years, 52% male, 93.8% white, mean time since arrest: 6 years, 24.1% scored in the upper quarter of EST severity). Greater mindfulness (β: -30, p = 0.002), older age (β: -0.30, p = 0.01) and longer time since CA (β: -0.23, p = 0.005) were associated with lower EST severity. Male sex was also associated with greater EST severity (β: 0.21, p = 0.009). Conclusion: ESTs are common among CA survivors. Mindfulness may be a protective skill that CA survivors use to cope with ESTs. Future psychosocial interventions for the CA population should consider using mindfulness as a core skill to reduce ESTs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10865-023-00405-x

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

3 of 10 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation

    In an earlier analysis of this sample, higher mindfulness correlated with less emotional distress.

    “Indeed, in a previous analysis of the present sample, greater mindfulness was associated with lower emotional distress (Presciutti et al., 2022b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Presciutti et al., 2022b source
  • Findingown data

    Longer time since cardiac arrest is associated with lower EST severity in long-term cardiac arrest survivors after adjustment.

    “older age (β: -0.30, p = 0.01) and longer time since CA (β: -0.23, p = 0.005) were associated with lower EST severity.”
    • Also stated in: § Results · plain
      “Older age (β: -0.30, p = 0.01) and greater time since the CA (-0.23, p = 0.005) were also associated with lower EST severity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The adjusted linear regression model accounted for 39% of the variance in EST scores.

    “Our model explained 39% of the variance in EST score.”
    • Also stated in: § Limitations · plain
      “our model explained only 39% of the variance in ESTs”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Older age is associated with lower EST severity in long-term cardiac arrest survivors after adjustment.

    “older age (β: -0.30, p = 0.01) and longer time since CA (β: -0.23, p = 0.005) were associated with lower EST severity.”
    • Also stated in: § Results · plain
      “Older age (β: -0.30, p = 0.01) and greater time since the CA (-0.23, p = 0.005) were also associated with lower EST severity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Male sex is associated with greater EST severity in long-term cardiac arrest survivors after adjustment.

    “Male sex was also associated with greater EST severity (β: 0.21, p = 0.009).”
    • Also stated in: § Results · plain
      “Male sex was associated with greater EST severity (β: 0.21, p = 0.009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 7
  • May combine two claims. 10
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The CAMS-R has received validation among HIV-positive individuals in Myanmar.

    “has been validated in people living with HIV in Myanmar (Huang et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Huang et al., 2021 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The study assessed ESTs using four ASI-R cardiac threat items, following a prior acute coronary syndrome study, in the absence of an established EST measure.

    “Our approach to measuring ESTs is consistent with a previous study that examined ESTs in acute coronary syndrome patients (Meli et al., 2019).”
    • Also stated in: § Limitations · plain
      “in the absence of an established EST measure, we instead utilized the four cardiac threat items from Anxiety Sensitivity Index, following the method of a previous study of EST in acute coronary syndrome patients (Meli et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Meli et al., 2019 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The analyzed sample consisted of 145 long-term cardiac arrest survivors with a mean age of 51 years, 52% male, 93.8% white, and a mean of 6 years since arrest.

    “We included 145 CA survivors (mean age: 51 years, 52% male, 93.8% self-identified as white, mean time since arrest: 6 years).”
    • Also stated in: § Results · plain
      “We included 145 CA survivors (mean age: 51 years, 52% male, 93.8% white, mean time since arrest: 6 years, 24.1% scored in the upper quarter of EST severity).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Greater mindfulness is associated with lower enduring somatic threat severity in long-term cardiac arrest survivors after accounting for age, sex, interval since arrest, pandemic-related stress, and pandemic-related income loss.

    “Greater mindfulness (β: -30, p = 0.002), older age (β: -0.30, p = 0.01) and longer time since CA (β: -0.23, p = 0.005) were associated with lower EST severity.”
    • Also stated in: § Results · plain
      “Greater mindfulness was associated with lower EST severity (β: -0.30, p = 0.002).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The CAMS-R validly measures mindfulness in long-term cardiac arrest survivors.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In this sample, EST severity scores spanned the 0-16 range, with 27.6% in the first quartile, 27.6% in the second, 20.6% in the third, and 24.1% in the upper quartile.

    “The distribution of EST scores was as follows: first (lower) quarter (0–3): 27.6%, second quarter (4–7): 27.6%, third quarter (8–11): 20.6%, fourth (upper) quarter (12–16): 24.1%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    An earlier cardiac arrest survivor study reported that cardiac-related anxiety was more common among younger patients.

    “a previous study of CA survivors also showed that younger survivors were more likely to experience cardiac-related anxiety (Rosman et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rosman et al., 2015 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The study used a convenience sample of SCAF members who were mostly white and had good neurologic recovery, limiting how representative the findings are.

    “our convenience sample predominantly self-identified as white, experienced good neurologic recovery, and were all SCAF members, which limits the representativeness of our findings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    SCAF members probably encounter survivorship subjects like mindfulness and ESTs more often than typical cardiac arrest survivors, and their answers may reflect availability bias.

    “SCAF members are likely more exposed to survivorship topics, such as mindfulness and ESTs, than the average CA survivor, and may have had an availability bias in their response pattern to our study’s measures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Many cardiac arrest survivors are surprised by these aftereffects and lack preparation for handling them.

    “Second, they often do not expect to experience these sequelae and are unprepared to manage them when they occur (Sawyer et al., 2016, 2020; Presciutti et al., 2022a).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sawyer et al., 2016, 2020; Presciutti et al., 2022a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The study omitted medication and clinical arrest variables usually obtained from charts, which might have helped explain post-arrest ESTs.

    “we did not collect pharmacological or CA clinical characteristics typically extracted from medical records, which both may have been relevant for better understanding ESTs post-CA.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Sources of post-arrest ESTs include device sensations or shocks, pain from resuscitation, tiredness, weakness, altered physical function, awareness of heart-rate changes, cognitive shifts, and other somatic reminders of the event.

    “Sources of post-CA ESTs can include the daily sensation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in those who received ICDs, ICD-delivered shocks, pain from rescue compressions, fatigue, weakness, changes in physical function, sensitivity to changes in heart rate, cognitive changes, and any other threatening somatic reminder of the CA event (Pedersen et al. 2005; Presciutti et al. 2022a;”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pedersen et al. 2005; Presciutti et al. 2022a; Qintar et al. 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Enduring somatic threats remind survivors of their body's fragility and death, concerns that are particularly relevant after cardiac arrest.

    “ESTs serve as reminders of the vulnerability of one’s body and mortality (Meli et al., 2019), which are two issues that are particularly present in the CA population (Bremer et al., 2019; Sawyer et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Meli et al., 2019; Bremer et al., 2019; Sawyer et al., 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    After cardiac arrest, survivors often face abrupt declines in thinking and physical ability due to brain injury, and these problems frequently persist.

    “First, they must contend with sudden losses in cognitive and physical abilities from brain injury, which often become chronic problems (Harrod et al., 2021; Moulaert et al., 2009; Sawyer et al., 2020; Presciutti et al., 2022a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Harrod et al., 2021; Moulaert et al., 2009; Sawyer et al., 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The male-sex association with higher EST severity might reflect that SCAF's voluntary membership draws survivors who are more distressed than those recruited consecutively in clinical settings.

    “This finding may be related to the recruitment source such that SCAF membership is opt-in and may attract survivors who are more likely to endorse and/or experience emotional distress than those consecutively enrolled in a medical setting.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
14 of 14
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Before this study, no research had measured the severity of ESTs in the post-cardiac-arrest population.

    “no studies have quantified the severity of ESTs post-CA.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Before this study, the connection between mindfulness and ESTs after cardiac arrest had not been investigated.

    “The relationship between mindfulness and ESTs post-CA, however, has not yet been explored.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The CAMS-R validly measures mindfulness in long-term cardiac arrest survivors.

    “We assessed mindfulness using the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R) (Feldman et al., 2007).”
3 of 3

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Mindfulness coefficient differs between abstract and results

    Minor

    The abstract reports a mindfulness coefficient of -30, while the Results section reports -0.30 for the same association. The discrepancy changes the reported magnitude by a factor of 100.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Presciutti, A. M., Bannon, S. M., Yamin, J. B., Newman, M. M., Parker, R. A., Elmer, J., Wu, O., Donnino, M. W., Perman, S. M., & Vranceanu, A.-M.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2023-03-09
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
890-896
ISSN
  • 0160-7715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3521
OpenAlex
W4323652482
Cited by
5
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (TL1 TR002533)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
cardiac arrest survivors, mindfulness, anxiety sensitivity, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, ICD shocks, post-traumatic stress, sex differences, COVID-19 stress, psychosocial interventions
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Anxiety, Female, Heart Arrest, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Survivors, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review