Cited by 50Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchResilience and Mental Health

Mindfulness and coping are inversely related to psychiatric symptoms in patients and informal caregivers in the neuroscience ICU: implications for clinical care

Open access
Shaffer, Kelly M., Riklin, Eric, Jacobs, Jamie M., Rosand, Jonathan, Vranceanu, Ana-Maria·2016·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Objective: To assess the correlation of psychosocial resiliency factors (mindfulness and coping) with symptoms of posttraumatic stress, anxiety, and depression in patients recently admitted to the neuroscience ICU and their primary informal caregivers. Design: A descriptive, cross-sectional correlational study. Setting: Neuroscience ICU in a major medical center. Participants: A total of 78 dyads of patients (total n = 81) and their primary caregivers (total n = 92) from June to December 2015. Study enrollment occurred within the first 2 weeks of patient admission to the neuroscience ICU. Intervention: None. Measurements and Main Results: Dyads completed self-report measures of mindfulness (Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised), coping (Measure of Coping Status-A), posttraumatic stress (Posttraumatic Checklist–Specific Stressor), anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-A), and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-D). Rates of clinically significant posttraumatic stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms were high and comparable between patient and caregiver samples. Own psychological resilience factors and psychiatric symptoms were strongly correlated for both patients and caregivers. Depressive symptoms were interdependent between patients and their caregivers, and one’s own mindfulness was independently related to one’s partner’s depressive symptoms. Conclusions: Rates of clinically significant psychiatric symptoms were high, equally prevalent in patients and caregivers, and interdependent between patients and their caregivers. For both patients and caregivers, psychological resiliency factors were associated with both self and partner psychiatric symptoms. Findings suggest that attending to the psychiatric health of both patients and caregivers in the neuroscience ICU is a priority and that patients and their caregivers must be considered together in a system to fully address either individual’s psychiatric symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ccm.0000000000001855

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mindfulness can have both state-like and trait-like qualities and is influenced by genetic and environmental factors.

    “Mindfulness, described as the capacity to nonjudgmentally attend to mental and physical processes during everyday activities 20 can possess both “state-like” and “trait-like” qualities and is considered to be influenced by both genetic and environmental influences.21,22”

    From Mindfulness, Anxiety Symptoms, and Quality of Life in Heart Failure. (2020) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Introduction describes mindfulness as attentive, nonjudgmental awareness, and the Measurement section describes a measure of everyday mindfulness; neither addresses the qualities attributed to citations 21 and 22. Searches for state-like and trait-like qualities and for genetic and environmental influences found no passage addressing those claims. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [45]Kenny DA Kashy DA Cook WL Dyadic Data Analysis 2006 The Guilford Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shaffer, K. M., Riklin, E., Jacobs, J. M., Rosand, J., & Vranceanu, A.-M.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2016-11
Volume
44
Issue
11
Pages
2028-2036
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2517278699
Cited by
50
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
6.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (F31CA189431, P30CA008748, T32CA009461)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R25NS088248)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
mindfulness, coping, psychiatric symptoms, post-traumatic stress, anxiety, depression, informal caregivers, psychological resilience, patient-caregiver dyads, intensive care unit patients
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Anxiety, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Male, Middle Aged, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Critical Illness, Caregivers, Resilience, Psychological, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review