Cited by 1,133Generational Differences and TrendsHigher Education and EmployabilityJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

New Generation, Great Expectations: A Field Study of the Millennial Generation

Ng, Eddy S. W., Schweitzer, Linda, Lyons, Sean T.·2010·Journal of Business and Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10869-010-9159-4

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ng, E. S. W., Schweitzer, L., & Lyons, S. T.
Affiliations
  • California State Polytechnic University (US)
  • Carleton University (CA)
  • University of Guelph (CA)
Corresponding author
Lyons, Sean T.
Venue
Journal of Business and Psychology
Published
2010-02-16
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
281-292
ISSN
  • 0889-3268 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-353X
OpenAlex
W2088942741
Cited by
1,133
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 127 · 2020: 112 · 2019: 124 · 2018: 82 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 42
FWCI
61.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Business and Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Generational Differences and Trends
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
millennials, career expectations, career priorities, generational differences, demographic heterogeneity, gender differences, visible minority status, academic performance, GPA, year of study, job satisfaction, salary expectations, career development, recruitment and retention, university students, work values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review