Cited by 132Generational Differences and TrendsEthics in Business and EducationCultural Differences and Values

Discovering the Millennials’ Personal Values Orientation: A Comparison to Two Managerial Populations

Weber, James·2017·Journal of Business Ethics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10551-015-2803-1

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weber, J.
Affiliations
Duquesne University (US)
Corresponding author
Weber, James
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Published
2015-08-06
Volume
143
Issue
3
Pages
517-529
ISSN
  • 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0697
OpenAlex
W2107009607
Cited by
128
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
22.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Business Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Palumbo Charitable Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Generational Differences and Trends
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
millennials, managerial values, generational differences, moral values, social values, axiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review