Cited by 80Interprofessional Education and CollaborationPsychiatric care and mental health servicesPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Behavioral Health Consultation and Primary Care: Lessons Learned

Robinson, Patricia J., Strosahl, Kirk D.·2009·Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings

Abstract

This article provides an overview of 20 years of professional experiences with developing and implementing a model for integrating behavioral health services into primary care. The Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) model is designed to provide immediate access to behavioral care for a large number of primary care patients by positioning a behavioral health consultant in the exam room area to function as a core member of the primary care team. In an initial era of discovery, the authors were directly involved in developing and testing a variety of new approaches to providing behavioral health services in general medicine. In a second era focused on feasibility, the authors worked with Kaiser Permanente, the United States Air Force and Navy, the Veteran's Administration, and the Bureau of Primary Care to system test this innovative model of integrated care. Now in an era devoted to dissemination, the authors review the various roles formal research, system level quality improvement initiatives and stakeholder analysis play in promoting integrated care. The authors also describe current efforts to (1) create a tool that helps systems develop integration targets and (2) use the PCBH model as a platform for teaching medical residents and behavioral health providers to work together in a redesigned primary care team model.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10880-009-9145-z

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robinson, P. J., & Strosahl, K. D.
Corresponding author
Robinson, Patricia J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
Published
2009-01-31
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
58-71
ISSN
  • 1068-9583 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3572
OpenAlex
W2002087777
Cited by
80
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
behavioral health integration, primary care, behavioral health consultants, integrated care, care coordination, quality improvement, stakeholder analysis, residency training, behavioral health workforce, Kaiser Permanente, veterans' health care
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Behavioral Medicine, Education, Medical, Humans, Mental Health Services, Primary Health Care, Quality of Life, Referral and Consultation, United States, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review