Cited by 94Menstrual Health and DisordersMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Cognitive-Behavioral and Pharmacological Interventions for Premenstrual Syndrome or Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder: A Meta-Analysis

Kleinstäuber, Maria, Witthöft, Michael, Hiller, Wolfgang·2012·Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings

Abstract

The current meta-analysis investigates the efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions and psychopharmacotherapy for premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and premenstrual dysphoric disorder. Based on a multiple-phase literature search, controlled trials were selected according to a priori defined inclusion criteria. Data were extracted on the basis of a standardized coding scheme. The standardized weighted mean difference (random effects model) was used as effect size index. Dependent on outcome, 22 included studies obtained small to medium effect sizes for cognitive-behavioral interventions (range: d(+) = 0.24-0.70) and for serotonergic antidepressants (range: d(+) = 0.29-0.58), at post-assessment. Follow-ups were performed only in studies of cognitive-behavioral interventions (range: d(+) = 0.46-0.74). There was no evidence of a publication bias. For both cognitive-behavioral interventions and serotonergic antidepressants, efficacy in treatment of PMS was found to not be satisfactory. Future research should possibly focus more on a combination of both approaches.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10880-012-9299-y

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kleinstäuber, M., Witthöft, M., & Hiller, W.
Affiliations
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Corresponding author
Kleinstäuber, Maria
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
Published
2012-03-18
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
308-319
ISSN
  • 1068-9583 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3572
OpenAlex
W2052892091
Cited by
94
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
premenstrual syndrome, premenstrual dysphoric disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, serotonergic antidepressants, psychotherapy, psychopharmacological treatment, treatment efficacy, menstrual disorders
MeSH terms
Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Humans, Premenstrual Syndrome, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review